Skip to main content
Log in

Parameter estimation of the stochastic AMR model and its application to the study of several strong earthquakes

  • Published:
Acta Seismologica Sinica

Abstract

Based on the stochastic AMR model, this paper constructs man-made earthquake catalogues to investigate the property of parameter estimation of the model. Then the stochastic AMR model is applied to the study of several strong earthquakes in China and New Zealand. Akaike’s AIC criterion is used to discriminate whether an accelerating mode of earthquake activity precedes those events or not. Finally, regional accelerating seismic activity and possible prediction approach for future strong earthquakes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowman D D, Ouillon G, Sammis C G,et al. 1998. An observational test of the critical earthquake concept [J].J Geophys Res,103(B10): 24 359–24 372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm D J, Braile L W. 1998. Intermediate-term earthquake prediction using precursory events in the New Madrid seismic zone [J].Bull Seis SocAmer,88(2): 564–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bufe C G, Nishenko S P, Varnes D J. 1994. Seismicity trends and potential for large earthquakes in the Alaska-Aleutian region [J].Pure Appl Geophys,142: 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bufe C G, Varnes D J. 1993. Predictive modeling of the seismic cycle in the Greater San Francisco Bay region zone [J].J Geophys Res,98: 9 871–9 983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compilation Group ofMathematic Manual. 1979.Mathematic Manual [M]. Beijing. Higher Education Press, 590–591 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Jin-guan, Xiang Jing-yi, Dai Jian-hua. 1990.Time Series Analysis — Constructing Model and Prediction [M]. Hefei: Anhui Education Press, 237–238 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harte D. 1999.Documentation for the Statistical Seismology Library [M]. Wellington: Victoria University, 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaume S C, Sykes L R. 1999. Evolving towards a critical point: A review of accelerating seismic moment/energy release prior to large and great earthquakes [J].Pure Appl Geophys,155: 279–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynnr S, Steven C J. 1990. Seismic activity on neighboring faults as a long-term precursor to large earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area [J].Nature,348: 595–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K. 1969. Some features of recent seismic activity in and near Japan (2). Activity before and after great earthquakes [J].Bull Earthquake ResInst, Tokyo Univ,47: 395–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata Y. 1989. Statistical model for standard seismicity and detection of anomalies by residual analysis [J].Tectophysics,169: 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata Y. 1998. Quiescence relative to the ETAS model, to appear in Zisin [J].JSeismol Soc Japan,2(10): 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R. 2000. A test of the precursory accelerating moment release model on some recent New Zealand earthquakes [J].Geophys J Int,140: 568–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleur H, Sammis C G, Sornette D. 1996. Discrete scale invariance, complex fractal dimensions and log-periodic fluctuations in seismicity [J].J Geophys Res,101: 17 661–17 677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel R B, Koontz J E, Weiss B E. 1985. A modular system of algorithms for unconstrained minimization [J].ACM Trans Math Software,11: 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata R. 1976. Selection of the order of an autoregressive model by Akaike’s Information Criterion [J].Biometrica,63(1): 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sornette D, Sammis C G. 1995. Complex critical exponent from renormalization group theory of earthquakes: Implications for earthquake prediction [J].Geophys J Int,5: 607–619 (in France).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes D J. 1989. Predicting earthquakes by analyzing accelerating precursory seismic activity [J].Pure Appl Geophys,130: 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vere-Jones D, Robinson R, Yang W Z. 2001. Remarks on the accelerated moment release model: Prediction of model formulation, simulation and estimation [J].Goephys J Int,144: 517–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Li-Feng, MA Li, Li Yong,et al. 2002. Research on seismic quiescence using magnitude cumulative sum method and its probability prediction [J].Chinese J Geophys,45(4): 711–722 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Cheng-xian, Chen Zhi-ping, Li Nai-cheng. 2002.Modern Optimization Method [M]. Beijing. Science Press, 90–102 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Vere-Jones D, Ma L. 2001. A proposed method for locating the critical region of a future earthquake using the critical earthquake concept [J].J Geophys Res,106: 4 121–4 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Guo-min, Fu Zheng-xiang, DU Xie-tai. 2001.Introduction to Earthquake Prediction [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 27–28 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Foundation item: National Natural Science Foundation of China (40074013, 40134010), Chinese Joint Seismological Science Foundation (042002) and the project during the Tenth Five-year Plan.

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, W., Li, M., Vere-Jones, D. et al. Parameter estimation of the stochastic AMR model and its application to the study of several strong earthquakes. Acta Seismol. Sin. 17, 177–189 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02896932

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02896932

Key words

Navigation