Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Older adults’ preferences for exercising alone versus in groups: Considering contextual congruence

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: A growing body of research suggests that older exercisers prefer to exercise alone rather than in group-based settings. One limitation of these studies, however, has been that researchers have failed to take into account the age-related characteristics of groups when asking adults about their preferences for exercise settings.Purpose: The overall purpose of this study was to examine the exercise preferences of 947 adults for involvement in standard exercise classes populated by participants from various categories across the age spectrum.Results: The results revealed that when faced with the prospect of exercising with considerably older or younger exercisers, participants found such an exercise context to be largely unappealing. However, in accordance with the basic tenets of self-categorization theory, the results revealed that older and younger adults alike express a positive preference for exercising in standard exercise classes comprised of similarly aged participants.Conclusions: The findings of this study challenge a growing call for exercise interventions for older adults to be primarily directed at the individual-level, and suggest that group-related intervention strategies may indeed be attractive to older exercisers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization:Health and Development Through Physical Activity and Sport. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization:The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al.: Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the center for disease control and prevention and the American college of sports medicine.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995,273:402–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sallis JF: Epidemiology of physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents.Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 1993,33:403–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sallis JF, Patrick K: Physical activity guidelines for adolescents: Consensus statement.Pediatric Exercise Science. 1994,6:302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sparling PB, Owen N, Lambert EV, Haskell WL: Promoting physical activity: The new imperative for public health.Health Education Research. 2000,15:367–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. King AC, Castro C, Wilcox S, et al.: Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial-ethnic groups of U.S. middle-aged and older-aged women.Health Psychology. 2000,19:354–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. King AC, Taylor CB, Haskell WL, DeBusk RF: Identifying strategies for increasing employee physical activity levels: Findings of the Stanford/Lockheed exercise survey.Health Education Quarterly. 1990,17:269–285.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilcox S, King AC, Brassignton GS, Ahn DK: Physical activity preferences of middle-aged and older adults: A community analysis.Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 1999,7:386–399.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burke SM, Carron AV, Eys MA: Physical activity context: Preferences of university students.Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2006,7:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson CE, Wankel LM: The effects of perceived activity choice upon frequency of exercise behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1980,10:436–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daley AJ, Maynard IW: Preferred exercise mode and affective responses in physically active adults.Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2003,4:347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Castro CM, King AC, Brassington, GS: Telephone versus mail interventions for maintenance of physical activity in older adults.Health Psychology. 2001,6:438–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. King AC, Friedman R, Marcus B, et al.: Harnessing motivational forces in the promotion of physical activity: The Community Health Advice by Telephone (CHAT) project.Health Education Research. 2002,17:627–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM, et al.: Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1998,20:174–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Napolitano MA, Fotheringham M, Tate D, et al.: Evaluation of an internet-based physical intervention: A preliminary investigation.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003,25:92–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jette AM, Lachman M, Giorgetti MM, et al.: Exercise—Its never too late: The strong-for-life program.American Journal of Public Health. 1999,89:66–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Deci EL, Ryan RM: A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In Dienstbier RA (ed),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation (Vol. 38). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1991, 237–288.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baumeister RF, Leary MR: The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychological Bulletin. 1995,117:497–529.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carron AV, Burke SM: Context and physical activity: The influence of others.Sport and Exercise Psychology Review. 2005,2:23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vallerand RJ: A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In Roberts GC (ed),Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2001, 263–319.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burke SM, Carron, AV, Eys MA, Ntoumanis N, Estabrooks PA: Group versus individual approach? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity.Sport and Exercise Psychology Review. 2006,2:19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carron AV, Hausenblas HA, Mack DE: Social influence and exercise: A meta-analysis.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1996,18:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dishman RK, Buckworth J: Increasing physical activity: A quantitative synthesis.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1996,28:706–719.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Institute: Patterns of physical activity.Progress in Prevention, Bulletin 2. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Institute, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fiske ST, Taylor SE:Social cognition (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klimoski RJ, Donahue LM: Person perceptions in organizations: An overview of the field. In London M (ed),How People Evaluate Others in Organizations: Person Perception and Interpersonal Judgment in I/O Psychology. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001, 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nickerson RS: How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others.Psychological Bulletin. 1999,125:737–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. United Kingdom Office of National Statistics:United Kingdom 2001 Census. Retrieved September 5, 2006 from http://www.statistics.gov.uk

  30. King AC: Promoting physical activity across the lifespan: Forging a transdisciplinary approach. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology. Vancouver, Canada: 2005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, V6T 1Z1, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    Mark R. Beauchamp Ph.D.

  2. School of Kinesiology, University of Western Ontario, USA

    Albert V. Carron Ph.D.

  3. Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Leeds, England

    Serena McCutcheon B.Sc. & Oliver Harper B.Sc.

Authors
  1. Mark R. Beauchamp Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albert V. Carron Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Serena McCutcheon B.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oliver Harper B.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Beauchamp Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Beauchamp, M.R., Carron, A.V., McCutcheon, S. et al. Older adults’ preferences for exercising alone versus in groups: Considering contextual congruence. ann. behav. med. 33, 200–206 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879901

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879901

Keywords

Search

Navigation