Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of two low-cost interventions for physical activity adoption. Sedentary (N=194) adults recruited through newspaper advertisements were randomized to receive either a motivationally-matched, individually-tailored intervention (IT) or a standard self-help intervention (ST). Assessments and interventions were delivered by repeated mailings at baseline, one, three, and six months. Participants were assessed regarding current physical activity behavior, motivational readiness to adopt regular physical activity, and psychological constructs associated with physical activity participation (e.g. self-efficacy, decisional balance). Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed significant increases in physical activity participation between baseline and six months for both groups with a significantly greater increase among IT participants. The IT group outperformed the ST group on all primary outcome measures: (a) minutes of physical activity per week, (b) reaching Centers for Disease Control and American College of Sports Medicine (CDC/ACSM) recommended minimum physical activity criteria, and (c) achieving the Action stage of motivational readiness for physical activity adoption. Both groups showed significant improvement between baseline and six months on the psychological constructs associated with physical activity adoption (e.g. self-efficacy), with no significant differences observed between the treatment groups. Utilizing computer expert systems and self-help manuals to provide individually-tailored, motivationally-matched interventions appears to be an effective, low-cost approach for enhancing physical activity participation in the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al: Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995,273(1): 402–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marcus BH, Rossi JS, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Abrams DB: The stages and processes of exercise adoption and maintenance in a worksite sample.Health Psychology. 1992,11: 386–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dishman RK: Overview. In Dishman RK (ed),Exercise Adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action. A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Janis IL, Mann L:Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Collier Macmillan, 1977, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, et al: The process of smoking cessation: An analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1991,59: 295–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Towards an integrative model of change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983,51: 390–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sallis JM, Hovell MR, Hofstetter CR, et al: A multivariate study of determinants of vigorous exercise in a community sample.Preventive Medicine. 1989,18: 20–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS: Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1992,63: 60–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS: Assessing motivational readiness and decision-making for exercise.Health Psychology. 1992,11: 257–261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blair SN, Powell KE, Bazzarre TL, et al: Physical inactivity, Workshop V.Circulation. 1993,88: 1402–1405.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcus BH, Banspach SW, Lefebvre RL, et al: Using the stages of change model to increase the adoption of physical activity among community participants.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1992,6: 424–429.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcus BH, Emmons KM, Simkin-Silverman LR, et al: Evaluation of stage-matched versus standard self-help physical activity interventions at the workplace.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1998,12(4): 246–253.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marcus BH, Simkin LR: The stages of exercise behavior.Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 1993,33: 83–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strecher VJ, Kreuter M, Den Boer D, et al: The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings.Journal of Family Practice. 1994,39: 262–268.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, Rossi JS: Standardized, individualized, interactive and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation.Health Psychology. 1993,12: 339–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sallis JF, Haskell W, Wood P, et al: Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1985,121: 91–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcus BH, Abrams DB, Parisi AF, Albrecht AE: Smoking cessation, weight gain, and exercise in women. National Cancer Institute Grant #R29CA59660, 1993.

  20. Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, et al: Reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors: Six-month results from Project Active.Preventive Medicine. 1997,26:883–892.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dishman RK: Compliance/adherence in health-related exercise.Health Psychology. 1982,1:237–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dishman R: Increasing and maintaining exercise and physical activity.Behavioral Therapy. 1988,22:345–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dishman RK, Sallis JF: Determinants and interventions for physical activity and exercise. In Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T (eds),Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994, 214–238.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martin JE, Dubbert PM, Katell AD, et al: Behavioral control of exercise in sedentary adults: Studies 1–6.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1984,52:795–811.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin JE, Dubbert PM: Exercise applications and promotion in behavioral medicine: Current status and future directions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1982,30:1004–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. American Heart Association:Walking for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. American Heart Association:Swimming for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. American Heart Association,Cycling for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  29. American Heart Association,Exercise Diary. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  30. LaPorte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ: Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: Problems and prospects.Public Health Reports. 1985,100:131–146.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dishman RK, Steinhardt M: Reliability and concurrent validity for a 7-day recall of physical activity in college students.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1988,20:14–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P, et al: Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1985,122:794–804.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobs Jr. DR, Ainsworth BE, Harman TJ, Leon AS: A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1993,25:81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by a grant from the Rhode Island Affiliate of the American Heart Association (#9407826S) and grants from the National Cancer Institute (R29CA59660 and KO7CAO1757) to Dr. Marcus.

We thank Joseph Rossi, Ph.D., and Colleen Redding, Ph.D., for their scientific contributions to this project. We thank Janice Tripolone, Stacy Chmura, Kalene Hafey, and Lisa Kopel for their invaluable assistance to this project.

About this article

Cite this article

Marcus, B.H., Bock, B.C., Pinto, B.M. et al. Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. ann. behav. med. 20, 174–180 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02884958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02884958

Keywords

Navigation