Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some anatomical aspects of plant virus disease problems

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

This review on the histo-pathological changes in virus-diseased plants clearly shows that anatomic studies may contribute toward elucidation of the nature of relationship between the virus and host. But for the realization of the full value of the research on the anatomy of diseased plants, a thorough knowledge of the normal anatomy is indispensable. This thought is most appropriately expressed in the words of Goethe as cited by Quanjer (108): “Ich wünsche man durchdränge sich recht von der Wahrheit, dass man keineswegs zur vollständigen Anschauung gelangen kann, wenn man nicht Normales und Abnormes immer zugleich gegen einander schwankend und wirkend betrachtet.”* Lack of knowledge of normal anatomy and the want of recognition of the profound changes that occur during the development of the plant body, be it healthy or diseased, are the frequent weaknesses of anatomical research conducted in connection with disease problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Artschwager, E. F. Histological studies on potato leaf-roll. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 559–570. 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —. Occurrence and significance of phloem necrosis in the Irish potato. Jour. Agr. Res.24: 237–245. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —. Studies on the potato tuber. Jour. Agr. Res.27: 809–835. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —, andStarrett, R. C. Histological and cytological changes in beet seedlings affected with curly top. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 637–657. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avery, G. S. Structure and development of the tobacco leaf. Amer. Jour. Bot.20: 565–592. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baccarini, P. Intorno ad una particolarità dei vasi cribrosi nelle Papilionacee. Malpighia6: 53–57. 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey, I. W. Slime bodies ofRobinia Pseudo-acacia L. Phytopath.13: 332–333. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bartholomew, E. T. Internal decline (endoxerosis) of lemons VI. Gum formation in the lemon fruit and its twig. Amer. Jour. Bot.15: 548–563. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baur, Erwin. Weitere Mitteilungen über die infektiöse Chlorose der Malvaceen und über einige analoge Erscheinungen beiLigustrum undLaburnum. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.24: 416–428. 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bawden, F. C. A study of the histological changes resulting from certain virus infections of the potato. Roy. Soc. Proc, B.111: 74–85. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  11. —. Studies on a virus causing foliar necrosis of the potato. Roy. Soc. Proc, B.116: 375–395. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  12. —. The viruses causing top necrosis (acronecrosis) of the potato. Ann. Appl. Biol.23: 487–497. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennett, C. W. Virus diseases of raspberries. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 80. 1927.

  14. -. Further observations and experiments with mosaic diseases of raspberries, blackberries, and dewberries. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 125. 1932.

  15. —. Plant-tissue relations of the sugar-beet curly-top virus. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 665–701. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  16. —. Studies on properties of the curly top virus. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 211–241. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. —. Correlation between movement of the curly top virus and translocation of food in tobacco and sugar beet. Jour. Agr. Res.54: 479–502. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  18. —, andEsau, Katherine. Further studies on the relation of the curly top virus to plant tissues. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 595–620. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bliesenick, H. Ueber die Obliteration der Siebröhren. Inaug. Diss. Erlangen. 63 p. W. Pormetter, Berlin. 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Böning, K. Die Mosaikkrankheit der Rübe. Forsch. a.d. Gebiet d. Pflanzenkr. u.d. Immunität im Pflanzenreich3: 81–128. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  21. —. Die Mosaikkrankheit der Ackerbohne (Vicia faba L.) Beitrag zu dem Mosaik der Papilionaceen. Forsch a.d. Gebiet d. Pflanzenkr. u.d. Immunität im Pflanzenreich4: 43–111. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brandenburg, E. Mosaikkrankheiten an Compositen. Forsch. a.d. Gebiet d. Pflanzenkr. u.d. Immunität im Pflanzenreich5: 39–72. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brehmer, W. v. Die anatomischen und mikrochemischen Veränderungen des Kartoffelleptoms. Rep. Int. Conf. Phytopath. & Econ. Entom., Wageningen1923: 79–85. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  24. —, andBärner, J. Ueber die Viruskrankheiten bei der Kartoffel. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst. Land. Forstwirtsch.18: 1–54. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  25. —, andRochlin, E. Histologische und mikrochemische Untersuchungen über pathologische Gewebsveränderungen viruskranker Kartoffelstauden. Phytopath. Zeits.3: 471–498. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Butler, E. J. Some aspects of the morbid anatomy of plants. Ann. Appl. Biol.17: 175–212. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Caldwell, J. The physiology of virus diseases in plants. I. The movement of mosaic in the tomato plant. Ann. Appl. Biol.17: 429–443. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. —. The physiology of virus diseases in plants. II. Further studies on the movement of mosaic in the tomato plant. Ann. Appl. Biol.18: 279–298. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Caldwell, J.. The physiology of virus diseases in plants. V. The movement of the virus agent in tobacco and tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol.21: 191–205. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Caldwell, J., andJames, A. L. An investigation into the “stripe” disease ofNarcissus. I. The nature and significance of the histological modifications following infection. Ann. Appl. Biol.25: 244–253. 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carsner, E., andStahl, C. F. Studies on curly top of the sugar beet. Jour. Agr. Res.28: 297–320. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Clinch, Phillis. Cytological studies of potato affected with certain virus diseases. Roy. Dublin Soc. Sci. Proc.20: 143–172. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cook, M. T. Histology and cytology of sugar cane mosaic. Jour. Dept. Agr. Porto Rico9: 5–27. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  34. —. The effect of some mosaic diseases on cell structure and on the chloroplasts. Jour. Dept. Agr. Porto Rico14: 69–101. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. —. The effect of mosaic on cell structure and chloroplasts. Jour. Dept. Agr. Porto Rico15: 177–181. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  36. —. Phloem necrosis in the stripe disease of corn. Jour. Agr. Univ. Puerto Rico20: 685–688. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Coulter, J. M., andChamberlain, C. J. Morphology of Angiosperms. 348 p. 1912.

  38. Crafts, A. S. Phloem anatomy, exudation, and transport of organic nutrients in cucurbits. Plant Physiol.7: 183–225. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. —. Sieve-tube structure and translocation in the potato. Plant Physiol.8: 81–104. 1933.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. —. Phloem anatomy in two species ofNicotiana, with notes on the interspecific graft union. Bot. Gaz.95: 592–608. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dickson, B. T. Studies concerning mosaic diseases. McDonald Coll. Tech. Bull.2: 1–125. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Doolittle, S. P. The mosaic disease of cucurbits. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 879. 1920.

  43. —, andMcKinney, H. H. Intracellular bodies in the phloem tissue of certain plants and their bearing on the mosaic problem. Phytopath.13: 326–329. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Drake, C. J., Martin, N. J., andTate, H. D. A suggested relationship between the protoplastic bridges and virus diseases in plants. Science80: 146. 1934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Duggar, B. M. The problem of seed transmission of the typical mosaic of tobacco. Abstract. Phytopath.20: 133. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  46. —, andArmstrong, J. K. Indications respecting the nature of the infective particles in the mosaic disease of tobacco. Ann. Mo. Bot. Garden10: 191–212. 1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Esau, Katherine. Pathologic changes in the anatomy of leaves of the sugar beet,Beta vulgaris L., affected by the curly-top disease. Phytopath.23: 679–712. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  48. —. Cell degeneration in relation to sieve-tube differentiation in curly-top beets. A preliminary note. Phytopath,24: 303–305. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  49. —. Ontogeny of phloem in the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Amer. Jour. Bot.21: 632–644. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. —. Ontogeny of the phloem in sugar beets affected by the curly-top disease. Amer. Jour. Bot.22: 149–163. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. —. Initial localization and subsequent spread of curly-top symptoms in the sugar beet. Hilgardia9: 397–436. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  52. —. Ontogeny and structure of the phloem of tobacco. Hilgardia11: 343–424. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Esmarch, F. Die Phloëmnekrose der Kartoffel. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.37: 463–470. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fife, J. M., andFrampton, V. L. The pH gradient extending from the phloem into the parenchyma of the sugar beet and its relation to the feeding behavior ofEutettix tenellus. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 581–593. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Fischer, Alfred. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Siebröhren Ber. Verhandl. Königl. Sächsisch. Ges. Wiss. Leipzig, Math.-Phys. Cl.38: 291–336. 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fischer, E., andGäumann, E. Biologie der pflanzenbewohnenden parasitischen Pilze. 428 p. 1929.

  57. Foëx, Ét. La nécrose du liber de la tige de pomme de terre atteinte de la maladie dite “de l’enroulement.” Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.170: 1336–1339. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gardner, M. W. Necrosis, hyperplasia and adhesions in mosaic tomato fruits. Jour. Agr. Res.30: 871–388. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  59. —. Hyperplastic crushing of the tracheal tubes in mosaic tomato stems. Phytopath.15: 759–763. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gilbest, A. H. Net-necrosis of Irish potato tubers. Vt. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 289. 1928.

  61. Goldstein, Bessie. A cytological study of the leaves and growing points of healthy and mosaic diseased tobacco plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club53: 499–599. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Grainger, J. The movement of tobacco mosaic virus in its host. Ann. Appl. Biol.20: 236–257. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. -. Virus diseases of plants. 104 p. 1934.

  64. —, andHeafford, R. M. Some effects of the ordinary tobacco mosaic upon the developmental anatomy of the host plant. Leeds Phil. and Lit. Soc. Proc.2: 406–415. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gratia, A., andManil, P. Pourquoi le virus de la mosaïque du tabac et le virus X de la pomme de terre ne passent-ils pas à la descendence par les graines? Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. Paris123: 509–510. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Grieve, B. J. Spotted wilt virus and the hormone heteroauxin. Nature138: 129. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Haas, A. R. C., andKlotz, L. J. Some anatomical and physiological changes inCitrus produced by boron deficiency. Hilgardia5: 175–197. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Hartzell, A. Movement of intracellular bodies associated with peach yellows. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.8: 375–388. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hewitt, W. B. Leaf-scar infection in relation to the olive-knot disease. Hilgardia (In press). 1938.

  70. Hill, H. D. A comparative study of certain tissues of giant-hill and healthy potato plants. Phytopath.24: 577–598. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hirayama, S., andYuasa, A. Cytological studies of tobacco mosaic. II. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan6: 119–128. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  72. —, —. Occurrence of inclusion bodies in the guard cells of the stonaata of mosaic-tobacco plants. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan6: 305–306. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hoggan, Ismé A. Cytological studies on virus diseases of solanaceous plants. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 651–671. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Holmes, F. O. Accuracy in quantitative work with tobacco mosaic virus. Bot. Gaz.86: 66–81. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. —. Local and systemic increase of tobacco mosaic virus. Amer. Jour. Bot.17: 789–805. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. —. Local lesions of mosaic inNicotiana tabacum L. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.3: 163–172. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  77. —. Movement of mosaic virus from primary lesions inNicotiana tabacum L. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.4: 297–322. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Jensen, J. H. Leaf enations resulting from tobacco mosaic infection in certain species ofNicotiana L. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.5: 129–142. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Johnson, E. M. Virus diseases of tobacco in Kentucky. Ky. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 306. 1930.

  80. Johnson, J., andHoggan, I. A. The challenge of plant virus differentiation and classification. Science73: 29–32. 1931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. —, —. A descriptive key for plant viruses. Phytopath.25: 328–343. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kasai, M. Investigations on the Nelson’s bodies as observed in leafroll, mosaic, and healthy plants. Ber. Ohara Inst. Landw. Forsch. Japan11: 443–461. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kerling, L. C. P. The anatomy of the “Kroepoek-diseased” leaf ofNicotiana tabacum and ofZinia elegans. Phytopath.23: 175–190. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Klebahn, H. Die Alloiophyllie derAnemone nemorosa und ihre vermutliche Ursache. Planta1: 419–440. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. —. Experimentelle und cytologische Untersuchungen im Anschluss an Alloiophyllie und Viruskrankheiten. Planta6: 40–95. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kofoid, C. A., Severin, H. H. P., andSwezy, O. Nelson’s spiral bodies in tomato mosaic not protozoa. Phytopath.13: 330–331. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kotila, J. E., andCoons, G. H. Trypanosome-like bodies in solanaceous plants. Phytopath.13: 324–325. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Kunkel, L. O. A possible causative agent for the mosaic disease of corn. Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Exp. Sta. Bull. Bot. III: 44–58. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  89. —. Histological and cytological studies on the Fiji disease of sugar cane. Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Exp. Sta. Bull. Bot. III: 99–107. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  90. —. Possibilities in plant virus classification. Bot. Rev.1: 1–17. 1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Küster, E. Pathologische Pflanzenanatomie. 3rd Ed. 558 p. 1925.

  92. —. Probleme der Pflanzengallen. Ber. Oberhessisch. Ges. Natur-u. Heilkunde Giessen16: 69–79. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Lacey, M. S. Protozoa and virus diseases of plants. Nature112: 280–281. 1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Lecomte, H. Contribution à l’étude du liber des Angiospermes. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot.10: 193–324. 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Léger, L. J. Recherches sur l’origine et les transformations des éléments libériens. Mém. Soc. Linnéenne de Normandie19: 51–182. 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Levine, M. Plant tumors and their relation to cancer. Bot. Rev.2: 439–455. 1936.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Livingston, L. G., andDuggar, B. M. Experimental procedures in a study of the location and concentration within the host cell of the virus of tobacco mosaic. Biol. Bull.67: 504–512. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Lyon, H. L. Three major cane diseases: mosaic, sereh, and Fiji disease. Hawaiian Sugar Planters’ Assoc. Exp. Sta. Bull. Bot. III: 1–43. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Magee, C. J. P. Investigations on the bunchy top disease of the banana. Aust. Sci. Indus. Res. Bull. 30. 63 p. 1927.

  100. Matsumoto, T. Some experiments with Azuki bean mosaic. Phytopath.12: 295–297. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  101. —, andSomazawa, K. Immunological studies of mosaic diseases. III. Further studies on the distribution of antigenic substance of tobacco mosaic in different parts of host plants. Jour. Soc. Trop. Agr. Japan5: 37–43. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Michailowa, P. V. Pathologico-anatomical changes in the tomato incident to development of woodiness of the fruit. Phytopath.25: 539–558. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Mrazek, A. Ueber geformte eiweissartige Inhaltskörper bei den Leguminosen. Oesterreich. Bot. Zeits.60: 198–201; 218–230; 312–321. 1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Nelson, Ray. The occurrence of protozoa in plants affected with mosaic and related diseases. Mich Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull.58: 1–30. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  105. -. Investigations in the mosaic disease of bean. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 118. 1932.

  106. —, andDown, E. E. Influence of pollen and ovule infection in seed transmission of bean mosaic. Abstract. Phytopath.23: 25. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Plantenga, Herma. Pathologische veranderingen in het phloeem. Thesis, 108 p. N. V. Hollandia-Drukkerij, Baarn. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Quanjer, H. M. Die Nekrose des Phloëms der Kartoffelpflanze, die Ursache der Blattrollkrankheit. Meded. Rijks Hoogere Land-, Tuinen Boschbouwschool6: 41–76. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  109. —. Phloemnekrose und Mosaik und die züchterische Massnahmen, wodurch man der Entartung, welche von diesen Kartoffelkrankheiten verursacht wird, in Holland vorbeught. Jahresber. Verein. Angew. Bot.14: 128–145. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  110. —. The methods of classification of plant viruses and an attempt to classify and name potato viroses. Phytopath.21: 577–613. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Rankin, W. H., andHockey, J. F. Mosaic and leaf curl (yellows) of the cultivated raspberry. Phytopath.12: 253–264. 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Rawlins, T. E. Phytopathological and botanical research methods. 156 p. 1933.

  113. Reddick, D. La transmission de virus de la mosaique du haricot par le pollen. Rapp. 2me Congres Int. Path. Comp.1: 363–366. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Riker, A. J., andBerge, T. O. Atypical and pathological multiplication of cells approached through studies on crown gall. Amer. Jour. Cancer25: 310–357. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Rochlin, Emilia. Zur Anatomie der mosaikkranken Kartoffelpflanzen. Phytopath. Zeits.2: 455–468. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ross, Hermann. Praktikum der Gallenkunde (Cecidiologie). 312 p. 1932.

  117. Rowe, E. A. A study of heart-rot of young sugar-beet plants grown in culture solutions. Ann. Bot.50: 735–746. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Salaman, R. N., andBawden, F. C. An analysis of some necrotic virus diseases of the potato. Roy. Soc. Proc., B111: 53–73. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Samuel, Geoffrey. The movement of tobacco mosaic virus within the plant. Ann. Appl. Biol.21: 90–111. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Schaffnit, E., andWeber, H. Ueber das Vorkommen von intrazellularen Körpern in den Geweben mosaikkranker Rüben. Forsch. Gebiet Pflanzenkr. Immunität im Pflanzenreich.4: 23–42. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Schander, R., andBielert. Nekrose und andere Degenerationserscheinungen im Phloem der Kartoffelpflanze. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst. Landu. Forstwirtsch.15: 609–670. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  122. —, andTiesenhausen, M. v. Kann man die Phloëmnekrose als Ursache oder Symptom der Blattrollkrankheit der Kartoffel ansehen? Mitt. Kaiser-Wilh.-Inst. Bromberg6: 115–124. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Severin, H. H. P. Minimum incubation periods of causative agent of curly leaf in beet leafhopper and sugar beet. Phytopath.11: 424–429. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  124. —. Curly leaf transmission experiments. Phytopath.14: 80–93. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Sheffield, F. M. L. The development of assimilatory tissue in solanaceous hosts infected with aucuba mosaic of tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol.20: 57–69. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. —. The role of plasmodesms in the translocation of virus. Ann. Appl. Biol.23: 506–508. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. —. The histology of the necrotic lesions induced by virus diseases. Ann. Appl. Biol.23: 752–758. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Smith, F. F. Some cytological and physiological studies of mosaic diseases and leaf variegations. Ann. Mo. Bot. Garden13: 425–484. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Smith, J. Henderson. Virus diseases in plants. I. Translocation within the plant. II. The amoeboid intracellular inclusions. Biol. Rev.5: 159–170. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Smith, Kenneth M., andBrooks, F. T. Recent advances in the study of plant viruses. 423 p. 1934.

  131. Smith, R. E., andBoncquet, A. New light on curly top of the sugar beet. Phytopath.5: 103–107. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Sorauer, P. Manual of plant diseases. 3rd Ed. Vol. I. Non-parasitic diseases. 908 p. Translated by Frances Dorrance. 1922.

  133. Stahel, Gerold. Zur Kenntnis der Siebröhrenkrankheit (Phloëmnekrose) des Kaffeebaumes in Surinam. I. Phytopath. Zeits.4: 65–82. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  134. —. Zur Kenntnis der Siebröhrenkrankheit (Phloëmnekrose) des Kaffeebaumes in Surinam. II. Phytopath. Zeits.4: 539–544. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  135. —. Zur Kenntnis der Siebröhrenkrankheit (Phloëmnekrose) des Kaffeebaumes in Surinam. III. Phytopath. Zeits.6: 335–357. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Staritz, C. Ueber einen neuen Inhaltskörper der Siebröhren einiger Leguminosen. Festschrift 250 jähriger Jubelfeier Gymnasiums St. Maria Magdalena. 200 p. 1893.

  137. Strasburger, E. Ueber den Bau und die Verrichtungen der Leitungsbahnen in den Pflanzen. Histologische Beiträge, vol. 3. 1000 p. 1891.

  138. Uppal, B. N. The movement of tobacco mosaic virus in leaves ofNicotiana sylvestris. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.4: 865–873. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Verplanke, G. Contribution à l’étude histologique et cytologique d’une maladie de la pomme de terre appelée en Amérique spindle tuber. Mém. Acad. Roy. Belgique. II11: 1–42. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  140. —. Étude histologique et cytologique des parties aériennes de la pomme de terre atteinte de “spindle tuber. ” Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique64: 128–176. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Warington, Katherine. The changes induced in the anatomical structure ofVicia faba by the absence of boron from the nutrient solution. Ann. Bot.40: 27–42. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Webber, I. E. Histological characteristics of plants grown in toxic concentrations of boron. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 189–194. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Went, F. W., andThimann, K. V. Phytohormones. 294 p. 1937.

  144. Wilhelm, Karl. Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Siebröhrenapparates dicotyler Pflanzen. 90 p. 1880.

  145. Wood, E. J. F. Some anatomical and cytological studies on Fiji disease of sugar cane. Roy. Soc. Victoria Proc.49: 308–313. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Woods, M. W. Intracellular bodies associated with ring-spot. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.5: 419–434. 1933z.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, USA

    Katherine Esau

Authors
  1. Katherine Esau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esau, K. Some anatomical aspects of plant virus disease problems. Bot. Rev 4, 548–579 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02870116

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02870116

Keywords

Search

Navigation