Skip to main content
Log in

Variability in Andeannuña common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae)

La variabilidad en nuñas en los Andes (frijol común, Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae)

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 July 1995

Abstract

Nuñas are a group of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) varieties, whose grains are consumed after toasting in their original Andean habitats. Nowadays, these varieties are restricted to certain parts of the highlands of Peru and Bolivia. Linguistic, ethnobotanical, and archaeological data suggest that they were grown in that zone duringpre-Hispanic times. SDS-PAGE electrophoresis shows a wide range ofphaseolin types amongnuñas, many of which are present in sympatric wild forms. This paper discusses the possibility thatnuñas resulted from an early and widely applied selection pressure during bean domestication in the Andes.

Résumé

Las nuñas o ‘frijoles reventones’ son un grupo de variedades de frijol común de las cuales los granos se consumen tostados en su hábitat original en los Andes. Este hábitat se restringe en la actualidad a algunas paries altas del Perú y de Bolivia. Los datos linguísticos, etnobotánicos y arqueológicos dejan suponer una presencia pre-Hispánica en la zona. Los análisis electroforéticos en SDSPAGE muestran una amplia gama de tipos de faseolina, varios de estos presentes enformas silvestres simpátricas. Se discute la posibilidad que las nuñas corresponden a una presión selectiva aplicada en forma temprana y amplia en el proceso de domesticatión del frijol en los Andes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, E. 1944. Maíz reventador. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 31:301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. 1988. Two-dimensional electrophoresis: operation of the ISO-DALT system. Large Scale Biology Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila, A., G. Avila, A. Brandolini, and A. Rojas de Hinojosa. 1987. Estudio de clasificacion de germoplasma de chuwi (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en el Centro Fitotécnico de Pairumani. Pages 177–190in Investigaciones sobre el mejoramiento genético y cultural de trigo duro, girasol, maíz, frijol, lupino y haba en Bolivia. Programa Pairumani, Fundación Pro-Bolivia, Instituto Italo-Latino Americano, Roma, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannerot, H., and D. G. Debouck. 1992. L’importance de la double domestication pour l’amélioration du haricot commun (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Pages 495–506in Complexes d’espéces, flux de génes et ressources génétiques des plantes. Colloque international en hommage à Jean Pernès. Publications du Bureau des Ressources Génétiques. Diffusion Lavoisier. Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, A. H., and B. D. Webster. 1990. Control of bruchids (Acanthoscelides obtectus; Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in beans stored on small farms in Colombia. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 33:158–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, B.F., and H. H. Iltis. 1992. Evolution of female sexuality in the maize ear (Zea mays L. subsp.mays—Gramineae). Economic Botany 46:212–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, F. A., and J. W. S. Brown. 1983. Breeding common bean for improved quantity and quality of seed protein. Pages 59–102in J. Janick, ed., Plant breeding reviews. AVI, Westport, Connecticut, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, H., H. Beir, and H. J. Gross. 1987. Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8:93–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, G., and L. Kaplan. 1984. Insect predation and the origin of large seed size inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Annual Report of the Beam Improvement Cooperative 27:104–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. W. S., F. A. Bliss, andT. C. Hall. 1981. Linkage relationships between genes controlling seed proteins in French bean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 60:251–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,Y. Ma, F. A., Bliss, and T. C. Hall. 1981. Genetic variation in the subunits of globulin-1 storage protein of French bean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 59:83–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, A. 1943. Las leguminosas argentinas silvestres y cultivadas. Acme Agency, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarena, F., A. Cerrate, and A. Huaringa. 1990. El frijol reventón “Numia, nuña o apa.” Revista del INIAA, Diciembre 1990, Lima, Peru, s.n.: 12–13.

  • Cardenas, M. 1969. Manual de plantas económicas de Bolivia. Imprenta Icthus, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardich, A. 1985. The fluctuating upper limits of cultivation in the Central Andes and their impact on Peruvian prehistory. Advances in World Archaeology 4:293–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez Leandro, A. 1989. Registro de la colección de germoplasma de frijol(Phaseolus spp.). Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizan, Huanuco, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Vega, G. 1609. Comentarios reales de los Incas. Libreria International del Perú, S.A., Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D. G. 1986a.Phaseolus germplasm collection in Cajamarca and Amazonas, Peru. Unpublished original report deposited at the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.

  • -. 1986b.Phaseolus germplasm collection in Northwestern Argentina. Unpublished original report deposited at the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.

  • -. 1987. Recoleccion de germoplasma dePhaseolus en el centro y centro-sur del Perú. Unpublished original report deposited at the International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.

  • -. 1988. Recolección de germoplasma dePhaseolus en Bolivia. Unpublished original report deposited at the Centro Internacional de Agriculture Tropical, Cali, Colombia.

  • —. 1989. Early beans(Phaseolus vulgaris L. andP. lunatus L.) domesticated for their aesthetic value? Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 32:62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,R. Castillo T., and J. Tohme. 1989. Observations on little-knownPhaseolus germplasm of Ecuador. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 80:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,M. Gamarra F., A. Ortiz V., and J. Tohme. 1989. Presence of a wild-weed-crop complex inPhaseolus vulgaris L. in Peru? Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 32:64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,A. Maquet, and C. E. Posso. 1989. Biochemical evidence for two different gene pools in lima beans,Phaseolus lunatus L. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 32:58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,and J. Tohme. 1988. Recoleccion de germoplasma dePhaseolus en el centro-sur del Perú. Unpublished original report deposited at the Centro Internacional de Agriculture Tropical, Cali, Colombia.

  • —,and J. Tohme. 1989. Implications for bean breeders of studies on the origins of common beans,Phaseolus vulgaris L. Pages 3–42in S. Beebe, ed., Current topics in breeding of common bean. Centro Internacional de Agriculture Tropical, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,O. Toro, O. M. Paredes, W. C. Johnson, and P. Gepts. 1993. Genetic diversity and ecological distribution ofPhaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in northwestern South America. Economic Botany 47: 408–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCandolle, A. 1883. Origine des plantes cultivées. Librairie Germer Bailliére et Cie, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrella, E. 1988. El pan de América. Ediciones Abya- Yala, Quito, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepts, P. 1993. The use of molecular and biochemical markers in crop evolution studies. Pages 51–94in M. K. Hecht, ed., Evolutionary biology. Vol. 27. Plenum Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,T. C. Osborn, K. Rashka, and F. A. Bliss. 1986. Phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean(Phaseolus vulgaris L.): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Economic Botany 40:451–468.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grobman, A., W. Salhuana, R. Sevilla, and P. C. Mangelsdorf. 1961. Races of maize in Peru: their origins, evolution and classification. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grun, P. 1990. The evolution of cultivated potatoes. Economic Botany 44 (3 Supplement):39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C.B. 1985. Of plants and people. Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosaka, K. 1986. Who is the mother of the potato? Restriction endonuclease analysis of chloroplast DNA of cultivated potatoes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 72:606–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iturbide, G. A., and M. Gispert. 1922. Amarantos de grano(Amaranthus spp.). Pages 91–99in E. Hernández Bermejo and J. León, eds., Cultivos marginados: otra perspectiva de 1492. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T. 1990. With bitter herbs they shall eat it. Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. 1956. The cultivated beans of the prehistoric Southwest. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 43:189–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. Archeology and domestication in AmericanPhaseolus (beans). Economic Botany 19: 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1980. Variation in the cultivated beans. Pages 145–148in T. F. Lynch, ed., Guitarrero Cave. Early man in the Andes. Academic Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. Accelerator mass spectrometry dates and the antiquity ofPhaseolus cultivation. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 37: 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and L. N. Kaplan. 1988.Phaseolus in archaeology. Pages 125–142in P. Gepts, ed., Genetic resources ofPhaseolus beans. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,T. F. Lynch, and C. E. Smith. 1973. Early cultivated beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from an intermontane Peruvian valley. Science 179:76–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,and C. E. Smith. 1985. Carbonized plant remains from the Calima region, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Procalima (Colombia) 5:43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, R. L., S. P. Singh, and P. Gepts. 1990. Novel phaseolin types in wild and cultivated common bean(Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Economic Botany 44:50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structure proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, L. R., and C. Donoso Z. 1990.Ugnimolinae (Myrtaceae), a potential fruit crop for regions of Mediterranean maritime and subtropical climates. Economic Botany 44:536–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareo, L. R., A. V. González, E. Barona, and S. Beebe. 1993. Fast and reliable one and two-dimensional electrophoretic parameters for phaseolin type identification. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 36:8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon, J. 1964a. The ‘Maca’ (Lepidium meyenii), a little known food plant of Peru. Economic Botany 18:122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964b. Plantas alimenticias andinas. Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas, Zona Andina, Boletin Técnico No. 6, Lima, Perú.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T. F., R. Gillepsie, J. A. J. Gowlett, and R. E. M. Hedges. 1985. Chronology of Guitarrero Cave, Peru. Science 229:864–867.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., and F. A. Bliss. 1978. Seed proteins of common bean. Crop Science 18:431–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maitre, A. 1990. Proyecto Frijol Zona Andina: anthropologia: informe final. Unpublished original report deposited at the Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia.

  • McNeish, R. S. 1967. A summary of the subsistence. Pages 290–319in D.S., Byers, ed., Environment and subsistence. Univ. Texas Press, Austin, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and R. K. Vierra. 1983. The preceramic way of life in the thorn forest scrub ecozone. Pages 130–187in R. S. McNeish, R. K. Vierra, A.Nelken-Terner, R. Lurie, and A. Garcia Cook, eds., Prehistory of the Ayacucho basin, Peru. IV. The preceramic way of life. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujica, A. 1992. Granos y leguminosas andinas. Pages 129–146in E. Hernández Bermejo and J. León, eds., Cultivos marginados: otra perspectiva de 1492. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, P. 1991. Plantas alimenticias del Ecuador precolombino. Pages 283–303in M. Rios and H. Borgtoft Pedersen, eds., Las plantas y el hombre. Ediciones Abya-Yala, Quito, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1989. Lost crops of the Incas: little known plants of the Andes with promise for worldwide cultivation. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, T. C. 1988. Genetic control of bean seed protein. CRC Critical Review in Plant Sciences 7:93–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parodi, L. R. 1932. Plantas sudamericanas cultivadas en la provincia de Jujuy. Gaea 4:19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1935. Relaciones de la agriculture prehispánica con la agriculture actual. Anales de la Academia Nacional Agronómica y Veterinaria Buenos Aires 1:115–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1966. La agriculture aborigen argentina. Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires, Eudeba, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patiflo, V. M. 1964. Plantas cultivadas y animates domesticos en América equinoccial. Vol. 2. Plantas alimenticias. Imprenta Departamental, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, D. M. 1988. La productión de alimentos en Real Alto: la aplicación de las técnicas etnobotanicas al problema de la subsistencia en el período formativo ecuatoriano. Biblioteca Ecuatoriana de Arqueología, Corporación Editora Nacional, Quito, Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. The origins of plant cultivation in South America. Pages 173–205in C. W. Cowan andP. J. Watson, eds., The origins of agriculture—An international perspective. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, W. 1924. Economic fruit-bearing plants of Ecuador. Contribution US National Herbarium 24: 101–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulgar Vidal, J. 1987. Geografia del Perú—Las ocho regiones naturales. Promoción Editorial Inca, S.A., Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, J. 1992. Raíces andinas. Pages 163–177in E. Hernández Bermejo, and J. León, eds., Cultivos marginados: otra perspectiva de 1492. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C. M., and M. Holle. 1990. AndeanLycopersicon esculentum var.cerasiforme: genetic variation and its evolutionary significance. Economic Botany 44 (3 Supplement):69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risi Carbone, J., and N. W. Galwey. 1989.Chenopodium grains of the Andes: a crop for temperate latitudes. Pages 222–234in G. E. Wickens, N. Haq, and P. Day, eds., New crops for food and industry. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez Vega, I. 1992. Frutales andinos. Pages 179–189in E. Hernández Bermejo, and J. León, eds., Cultivos marginados: otra perspectiva de 1492. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, J. D. 1950. The grain amaranths: a survey of their history and classification. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 37:561–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schinkel, C, and P. Gepts. 1988. Phaseolin diversity in the tepary bean,Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray. Plant Breeding 101:292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, V., and D. G. Debouck. 1991. Observations on the origin ofPhaseolus polyanthus Greenman. Economic Botany 45:345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellie-Dessert, K. C., andF. A. Bliss. 1991. Genetic improvement of food quality factors. Pages 649–677in A.van Schoonhoven and O. Voysest, eds., Common beans: research for crop improvement. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. P., P. L. Gepts, and D. G. Debouck. 1991. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Economic Botany 45:379–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukup, J. 1986. Vocabulario de los nombres vulgares de la flora peruana y catálogo de los géneros. Editorial Salesiana, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaeth, S. C., D. G. Debouck, J. Tohme, and J.van Beem. 1989. Microstructure of nuñas: Andean popping beans(Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Microstructure 8:263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrago, M. N. 1980. El proceso de agriculturización en el noroeste argentino, zona valliserrana. Actas V Congreso Nacional de Arqueologia Argentina, Tomo 1. Universidad Nacional de San Juan, Instituto Investigaciones Arqueológicas y Museo: 181-

  • Toro, O., J. Tohme, and D. G. Debouck. 1990. Wild bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): description and distribution. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Beem, J., J. Kornegay, and L. Lareo. 1992. Nutritive value of thenuña popping bean. Economic Botany 46:164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and S. C. Spaeth. 1990. Popping innuña beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) grown outside traditional areas. Economic Botany 44:133–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Hammen, T., and E. González. 1992. Clima y vegetación del Holoceno y Tardiglacial del páramo de Palacio (Cordillera Oriental, Colombia). Pages 125–137in T. van der Hammen, ed., Historia, ecología y vegetación. Corporación Colombiana para la Amazonia “Araracuara,” Bogotá, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, J., J. Tohme, and D. G. Debouck. 1990. Common bean domestication in the southern Andes. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 33:104–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voysest, O. 1983. Variedades de fríjol en América Latina y su origen. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen, E. J., L. M. Roberts, and E. Hernandez Xolocotzi. 1952. Races of maize in Mexico. Their origin, characteristics and distribution. Bussey Institution, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacovleff, E., and F. L. Herrera. 1934. El mundo vegetal de los antiguos peruanos. Revista Museo Nacional Lima (Peru) 3:241–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, C. 1986. Lanuña. Pages 233–234in E. Chavez and M. Tapia, eds., Anales V Congreso Internacional de Sistemas Agropecuarios Andinos, PISA, Puno, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. 1992. Biological diversity and local development: “popping beans” in the Central Andes. Mountain Research and Development 12:47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02862356.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tohme, J., Toro, O.C., Vargas, J. et al. Variability in Andeannuña common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 49, 78–95 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862280

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862280

Key words

Navigation