Abstract
Common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) has been identified as a potential whole-plant source of poly phenol, oil, and polymeric hydrocarbon. Based on in situ sampling, a range of 4.7-14.4% (dry weight) polyphenol + oil (variation significant at 1% level) and 0.2-1.2% polymeric hydrocarbon (variation significant at 5% level) were found among 48 Maryland and northern Virginia populations. In a 2-yr replicated evaluation of progenies from 41 populations, significant differences (5% level) in vigor,Aphis nerii feeding preference, numbers of plants surviving the seeding year, and numbers of tillers produced the second year were observed. Genetic variation for agronomic traits was generally small, but appeared sufficient to justify a breeding program. Excluding aphid feeding-preference, all agronomic variables were positively correlated with each other (significant at 1% level); aphid feeding-preference was weakly, negatively correlated with the remaining agronomic variables (significant at 1% level). Chemical and agronomic data were not significantly correlated. Factor analysis indicated that plants which performed well early in their life cycle would be expected to perform well on a long term basis. Based on cluster analysis, the environment in which some populations developed may have affected in situ production of poly phenols + oil and polymeric hydrocarbon as well as the subsequent agronomic performance of their progenies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Buchanan, R. A., I. M. Cull, F. H. Otey, and C. R. Russell. 1978. Hydrocarbon-and rubber-producing crops. Econ. Bot. 32: 131–145.
—, and F. H. Otey. 1979. Multi-use oil-and hydrocarbon-producing crops in adaptive systems for food, material, and energy production. Biosources Digest 1: 176–202.
Cramer, G. L. 1977. Life history of common milkweed. Proc. N. Central Weed Control Conf. 32: 99–100.
Gaertner, E. E. 1979. The history and use of milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.). Econ. Bot. 33: 119–123.
Gerhardt, F. 1929. Propagation and food translocation in the common milkweed. J. Agric. Res. 39: 837–851.
Groh, H., and W. G. Dore. 1945. A milkweed survey in Ontario and adjacent Quebec. Sci. Agric. 25: 463–481.
Harman, H. H. 1976. Modern Factor Analysis. 3rd ed. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
Helwig, J. T., and K. A. Council. 1979. Statistical Analysis System Users Guide. SAS Institute Inc. Raleigh, NC.
Jeffery, L. S., and L. R. Robison. 1971. Growth characteristics of common milkweed. Weed Sci. 19: 193–196.
Johnson, S. C. 1967. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32: 241–254.
Kephart, S. R. 1981. Breeding systems inAsclepias incarnata L.,A. syriaca L., and A.verticillata L. Amer. J. Bot. 68: 226–232.
Oegema, T., and R. A. Fletcher. 1972. Factors that influence dormancy in milkweed seeds. Canad. J. Bot. 50: 713–718.
Snedecor, G. W., and W. C. Cochran. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA.
Stevens, O. A. 1945. Cultivation of milkweed. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 333.
Timmons, F. L. 1946. Studies of the distribution and floss yield of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) in northern Michigan. Ecology 27: 212–225.
Tukey, J. W. 1949. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5: 99–144.
Wang, S., and J. B. Huffman. 1981. Botanochemicals: Supplements to petrochemicals. Econ. Bot. 35: 369–382.
Woodson, R. E., Jr. 1941. The North American Asclepiadaceae. I. Perspective of the genera. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 28: 193–244.
— 1954. The North American species of Asclepias. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 41: 1–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, T.A. Chemical and agronomic evaluation of common milkweed,Asclepias syriaca . Econ Bot 37, 174–180 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858782
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858782