Skip to main content
Log in

Mineral nutrition of carnivorous plants: A review

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant carnivory is one of many possible adaptation strategies to unfavorable conditions, mostly low nutrient availability in wet, acid soils. The following issues concerning the mineral nutrition of carnivorous plants are reviewed: the relative importance of carnivory and root nutrition for growth; which nutrients (elements) from prey are of principal importance for growth; the relationship between mineral and organic nutrition based on carnivory; the interactions between carnivory and root mineral nutrition; and the importance of carnivory under natural conditions. Special attention is paid to aquatic carnivorous plants. Studies on mineral nutrition carried out in laboratory and/or greenhouse conditions are discussed separately from those carried out in field conditions. The emphasis of this review is on recapitulation of original data and conclusions of results from a variety of studies that approach carnivorous plants from an ecophysiological point of view.

Zusammenfassung

Die Karnivorie der Pflanzen ist eine von mehreren Adaptationsstrategien zu ungünstigen Bedingungen, meist zu niedrigem Nährstoffangebot in feuchten, sauren Böden. Es wird eine Übersicht präsentiert über folgende Fragen der Mineralernährung von karnivoren Pflanzen: die entsprechende Bedeutung der Karnivorie und der Wurzelernährung für das Wachstum; welche Nährstoffe (Elemente) von der Beute prinzipielle Bedeutung für das Wachstum haben; welche Beziehung ist zwischen der anorganischen und organischen Ernährung, die auf der Karnivorie beruht; welche Zwischenbeziehung besteht zwischen der Karnivorie und der Mineralernährung durch Wurzeln; und welche Bedeutung hat die Karnivorie unter natürlichen Bedingungen. Eine besondere Aufmerksamkeit ist den aquatischen karnivoren Pflanzen gewidmet. Untersuchungen über Mineralernährung in Labor- und/oder Gewächshausbedingungen werden gesondert von Ergebnissen diskutiert, die unter Feldbedingungen gewonnen wurden. In dieser Übersicht werden nachdrücklich Originaldaten und Schlussfolgerungen aus Ergebnissen verschiedener Studien rekapituliert, die sich mit karnivoren Pflanzen vom ökophysiologischen Standpunkt befassen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adamec, L. 1995a. Photosynthetic inorganic carbon use by aquatic carnivorous plants. Carniv. Pl. Newslett.24: 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995b. Ecological requirements ofAldrovanda vesiculosa L. Testing of its new potential sites in the Czech Republic. Acta Bot. Gallica142: 673–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1997. Photosynthetic characteristic of the aquatic carnivorous plantAldrovanda vesiculosa. Aquatic Bot. (in press).

  • —,K. Dušáková &M. Jonáčková. 1992. Growth effects of mineral nutrients applied to the substrate or onto the leaves in four carnivorous plant species. Carniv. Pl. Newslett.21:18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akeret, B. 1993. Ein neuer Fundort vonAldrovanda vesiculosa L. in der Nordschweiz und einige Bemerkungen zuStratiotes aloides L. Bot. Helv.103: 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldenius, J., B. Carlsson &S. Karlsson. 1983. Effects of insect trapping on growth and nutrient content ofPinguicula vulgaris L. in relation to the nutrient content of the substrate. New Phytol.93: 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts, G. H. P. &R. S. E. W. Leuven. 1988. Floristic changes in shallow soft waters in relation to underlying environmental factors. Freshwater Biol.20: 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashida, J. 1937. Studies on the leaf movement ofAldrovanda vesiculosa L. III. Reaction time in relation to temperature. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)51: 505–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, T. &J. F. Gennaro. 1971. Fly in the sundew. Nat. Hist.80: 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, G. E. &J. W. Anderson. 1976a. Studies on the nutrition and growth ofDrosera species with reference to the carnivorous habit. New Phytol.76:129–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1976b. Uptake and metabolism of insect metabolites by leaves and tentaclesof Drosera species. New Phytol.77: 625–634.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, C. T. &J. Pastor. 1995. Nutrient limitations in the northern pitcher plantSarracenia purpurea. Canad. J. Bot.73: 728–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, N. L. 1976. The role of carnivory inSarracenia flava L. with regard to specific nutrient deficiencies. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.92:144–147.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R. M. M. 1989. Studies in plant survival. Vol. 11in Studies in ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1875. Insectivorous plants. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, K. W., J. S. Pate &W. J. Bailey. 1980. Nitrogen nutrition of the tuberous sundewDrosera erythrorhiza Lindl. with special reference to catch of arthropod fauna by its glandular leaves. Austral. J. Bot.28: 283–297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dykyjová, D. 1979. Selective uptake of mineral ions and their concentration factors in aquatic higher plants. Folia Geobot. Phytotax.14: 267–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleuterius, L. N. &S. B. Jones Jr. 1969. A floristic and ecological study of pitcher plant bogs in south Mississippi. Rhodora71:29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian-Galan, G. &N. Salageanu. 1968. Considerations on the nutrition of certain carnivorous plants (Drosera capensis andAldrovanda vesiculosa). Rev. Roumaine Biol. Sér. Bot.13: 275–280.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D., J. K. Morton &P. Y. Jui. 1986. Aquatic vascular plants in Sibley Provincial Park in relation to water chemistry and other factors. Canad. Field Naturalist100:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friday, L. E. 1989. Rapid turnover of traps inUtricularia vulgaris L. Oecologia80: 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &C. Quarmby. 1994. Uptake and translocation of prey-derived15N and32P inUtricularia vulgaris L. New Phytol.126: 273–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, T. C. 1983. Competition, disturbance and the carnivorous plant community in the southeastern United States. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah.

  • Givnish, T. J., E. L. Burkhardt, R. E. Happel &J. D. Weintraub. 1984. Carnivory in the bromeliadBrocchinia reducta, with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist, nutrient-poor habitats. Amer. Naturalist124: 479–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder, R. 1963. Blütenbildung durch tierische Zusatznahrung und andere Faktoren beiUtricularia exoleta R. Braun. Planta59: 459–471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1970.Utricularia als Objekt für Heterotrophieuntersuchungen (Wechselwirkung von Saccharose und Acetat). Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Untersuch.63:181–184.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — &I. Zemlin. 1967. Förderung der Entwicklung und des Blühens vonPinguicula lusitanica durch Fütterung in axenischer Kultur. Planta73:181–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1968. Blütenbildung vonPinguicula lusitanica in vitro durch Fütterung mit Pollen. Planta78: 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, R. A. &M. D. Fornwall. 1988. Interactions of inorganic carbon and light availability as controlling factors in aquatic macrophyte distribution and productivity. Limnol. & Oceanogr.33: 1202–1208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, K., F. Michelangeli, J. M. Gonzalez, B. Miras &M. C. Ruiz. 1992. Carnivory in pitcher plants of the genusHeliamphora (Sarraceniaceae). New Phytol.122: 733–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juniper, B. R., R. J. Robins &D. M. Joel. 1989. Carnivorous plants. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadono, Y. 1982. Occurrence of aquatic macrophytes in relation to pH, alkalinity, Ca++, Cl and conductivity. Jap. J. Ecol.32: 39–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamiński, R. 1987a. Studies on the ecology ofAldrovanda vesiculosa L. I. Ecological differentiation ofA. vesiculosa population under the influence of chemical factors in the habitat. Ekol. Polska35: 559–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987b. Studies on the ecology ofAldrovanda vesiculosa L. II. Organic substances, physical and biotic factors and the growth and development ofA. vesiculosa. Ekol. Pol.35: 591–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, P. S. 1988. Seasonal patterns of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium utilization by threePinguicula species. Fund. Ecol.2: 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &J. S. Pate. 1992a. Contrasting effects of supplementary feeding of insects or mineral nutrients on the growth and nitrogen and phosphorus economy of pygmy species ofDrosera. Oecologia92: 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1992b. Resource allocation to asexual gemma production and sexual reproduction in south-western Australian pygmy and micro stilt-form species of sundew (Drosera spp., Droseraceae). Austral. J. Bot.40: 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &B. Carlsson. 1984. Why doesPinguicula vulgaris L. trap insects? New Phytol.97: 25–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,K. O. Nordell, B. Carlsson &B. M. Svensson. 1991. The effect of soil nutrient status on prey utilization in four carnivorous plants. Oecologia86: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——,S. Eirefelt &A. Svensson. 1987. Trapping efficiency of three carnivorousPinguicula species. Oecologia73: 518–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,L. M. Thorén &H. M. Hanslin. 1994. Prey capture by threePinguicula species in a subarctic environment. Oecologia99: 188–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. E. 1988. The ecophysiological significance of carnivory inUtricularia vulgaris. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin.

  • —. 1992. Costs of carnivory in the common bladderwort,Utricularia macrorhiza. Oecologia89: 348–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &T. M. Frost. 1991. Bladder control inUtricularia macrorhiza: lake specific variation in plant investment in carnivory. Ecology72: 728–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiya, S. 1966. A report on the natural habitat ofAldrovanda vesiculosa found in Hanyu City. Amatores Herb. (Kobe, Japan)27: 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosiba, P. 1992a. Studies on the ecology ofUtricularia vulgaris L. I. Ecological differentiation ofUtricularia vulgaris L. population affected by chemical factors of the habitat. Ekol. Polska40: 147–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992b. Studies on the ecology ofUtricularia vulgaris L. II. Physical, chemical and biotic factors and the growth ofUtricularia vulgaris L. in culturesin vitro. Ekol. Polska40: 193–212.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. [Ecological characteristic of the population ofUtricularia ochroleuca Hartmann andUtricularia neglecta Lehmann as well as their conditions of occurrence in Wegliniec] Acta Univ. Wratislav, Prace Bot.52: 25–32. [In Polish.]

    Google Scholar 

  • — &J. Sarosiek. 1989. [The site ofUtricularia intermedia Hayne andUtricularia minor L. in Strzybnica near Tarnowskie Góry.] Acta Univ. Wratislav, Prace Bot.39: 71–78. [In Polish.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafft, C. C. &S. N. Handel. 1991. The role of carnivory in the growth and reproduction ofDrosera filiformis andD. rotundifolia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club118: 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd F. E. 1942. The carnivorous plants. Chronica Botanica, Vol. 9. Waltham, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lollar, A. Q., D. C. Coleman &C. E. Boyd. 1971. Carnivorous pathway of phosphorus uptake byUtricularia inflata. Arch. Hydrobiol.69: 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüttge, U. 1964. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Carnivoren-Drüsen. III. Der Stoffwechsel der resorbierten Substanzen. Flora155: 228–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Carnivoren-Drüsen. II. Mittteilung. Über die Resorption verschiedener Substanzen. Planta66: 331–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1983. Ecophysiology of carnivorous plants. Pp. 489–517in O. L. Lange et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New ser. Vol. 12C. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maberly, S. C. &D. H. N. Spence. 1983. Photosynthetic inorganic carbon use by freshwater plants. J. Ecol.71: 705–724.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, R. E. 1978. Carbon-uptake by the submerged hydrophyteUtricularia purpurea. Aquatic Bot.5: 209–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1980. The temperature-determined growing season of a submerged hydrophyte: tissue chemistry and biomass turnover ofUtricularia purpurea. Freshwater Biol.10: 391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis, J. 1927. [On the influence of insect feeding onDrosera.] Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. [In Dutch.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, J. S. &K. W. Dixon. 1978. Mineral nutrition ofDrosera erythrorhiza Lindl. with special reference to its tuberous habit. Austral. J. Bot.26: 455–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, G. L. &J. B. Kethley. 1964. Foliar absorption of amino-acids, peptides and other nutrients by the pitcher-plantSarracenia flava. Bot. Gaz.125: 245–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. &O. Pringsheim. 1967. Small contributions to the physiology ofUtricularia. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Untersuch.57: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichte, D. E., M. H. Shanks &D. A. Crossley. 1969. Calcium, potassium and sodium content of forest floor arthropods. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer.62: 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. R. &H. J. Oosting. 1958. Responses of Venus fly trap (Dionaea muscipula) to factors involved in its endemism. Ecol. Monogr.28: 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychnovská-Soudková, M. 1953. [Study on mineral nutritionof Drosera rotundifolia L. I. Influence of calcium as an important physiological and ecological factor.] Preslia (Prague)25: 51–66. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. [Study on mineral nutrition ofDrosera rotundifolia L. II. Root sorption of inorganic nitrogen.] Preslia (Prague)26: 55–66. [In Czech.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, E.-D., G. Gebauer, W. Schulze &J. S. Pate. 1991. The utilization of nitrogen from insect capture by different growth forms ofDrosera from Southwest Australia. Oecologia87: 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. &E.-D. Schulze. 1990. Insect capture and growth of the insectivorousDrosera rotundifolia L. Oecologia82: 427–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwintzer, C. R. 1978. Vegetation and nutrient status of northern Michigan fens. Canad. J. Bot.56: 3044–3051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, C. &S. Komiya. 1972. Increase of nitrogen content in the leavesof Drosera rotundifolia fed with protein. Jap. Bull. Nippon Dental Coll., Gen. Educ.1: 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1973. Changes of nitrogen content in the leaves ofDrosera rotundifolia during feeding with protein. Jap. Bull. Nippon Dental Coll., Gen. Educ2: 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simola, L. K. 1978. The effect of several amino acids and some inorganic nitrogen sources on the growth ofDrosera rotundifolia in long- and short-day conditions. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Untersuch.90: 61–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, F. M. 1981. The mineral contents of both peat and plants and their interrelationships at Borth Bog, Wales. Irish National Peat Communications. Proc. 7th Intl. Peat Congr.1: 450–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. G. C., A. Onraet, D. S. Grierson &G. Reynolds. 1977. Studies on insect-free growth, development and nitrate-assimilating enzymes ofDrosera aliciae Hamet. New Phytol.79: 127–133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, D. R. &W. T. Jackson. 1968. The utilization of paramecia by the carnivorous plantUtricularia gibba. Planta83: 166–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C. N., Jr. &E. T. Nilsen. 1992.Drosera rotundifolia growth and nutrition in a natural population with special reference to the significance of insectivory. Canad. J. Bot.70: 1409–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studnička, M. 1991. Interesting succulent features in thePinguicula species from the Mexican evolutionary centre. Folia Geobot. Phytotax.26: 459–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, B. M. 1995. Competition betweenSphagnum fuscum andDrosera rotundifolia: a case of ecosystem engineering. Oikos74: 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thum, M. 1988. The significance of carnivory for the fitness ofDrosera in its natural habitat. 1. The reactions ofDrosera intermedia andD. rotundifolia to supplementary feeding. Oecologia75: 472–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989a. The significance of opportunistic predators for the sympatric carnivorous plant speciesDrosera intermedia andDrosera rotundifolia. Oecologia81: 397–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989b. The significance of carnivory for the fitness ofDrosera in its natural habitat. 2. The amount of captured prey and its effect onDrosera intermedia andDrosera rotundifolia. Oecologia81: 401–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. P., J. N. Matthiessen &B. P. Springett. 1982. Arthropod associates and macronutrient status of the red-ink sundew (Drosera erythrorhiza Lindl.). Austral. J. Ecol.7: 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. D. 1985. The growth ofDrosera intermedia in nutrient-rich habitats: the role of insectivory and interspecific competition. Canad. J. Bot.63: 2468–2469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, L. M. 1981. Feeding behavior of a plant: differential prey capture in old and new leaves of the pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea). Amer. Midl. Naturalist106: 352–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora, R. 1990. Observational and experimental study of a carnivorous plant-ant kleptobiotic interaction. Oikos59: 368–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adamec, L. Mineral nutrition of carnivorous plants: A review. Bot. Rev 63, 273–299 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857953

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857953

Keywords

Navigation