Abstract
Plant carnivory is one of many possible adaptation strategies to unfavorable conditions, mostly low nutrient availability in wet, acid soils. The following issues concerning the mineral nutrition of carnivorous plants are reviewed: the relative importance of carnivory and root nutrition for growth; which nutrients (elements) from prey are of principal importance for growth; the relationship between mineral and organic nutrition based on carnivory; the interactions between carnivory and root mineral nutrition; and the importance of carnivory under natural conditions. Special attention is paid to aquatic carnivorous plants. Studies on mineral nutrition carried out in laboratory and/or greenhouse conditions are discussed separately from those carried out in field conditions. The emphasis of this review is on recapitulation of original data and conclusions of results from a variety of studies that approach carnivorous plants from an ecophysiological point of view.
Zusammenfassung
Die Karnivorie der Pflanzen ist eine von mehreren Adaptationsstrategien zu ungünstigen Bedingungen, meist zu niedrigem Nährstoffangebot in feuchten, sauren Böden. Es wird eine Übersicht präsentiert über folgende Fragen der Mineralernährung von karnivoren Pflanzen: die entsprechende Bedeutung der Karnivorie und der Wurzelernährung für das Wachstum; welche Nährstoffe (Elemente) von der Beute prinzipielle Bedeutung für das Wachstum haben; welche Beziehung ist zwischen der anorganischen und organischen Ernährung, die auf der Karnivorie beruht; welche Zwischenbeziehung besteht zwischen der Karnivorie und der Mineralernährung durch Wurzeln; und welche Bedeutung hat die Karnivorie unter natürlichen Bedingungen. Eine besondere Aufmerksamkeit ist den aquatischen karnivoren Pflanzen gewidmet. Untersuchungen über Mineralernährung in Labor- und/oder Gewächshausbedingungen werden gesondert von Ergebnissen diskutiert, die unter Feldbedingungen gewonnen wurden. In dieser Übersicht werden nachdrücklich Originaldaten und Schlussfolgerungen aus Ergebnissen verschiedener Studien rekapituliert, die sich mit karnivoren Pflanzen vom ökophysiologischen Standpunkt befassen.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Adamec, L. 1995a. Photosynthetic inorganic carbon use by aquatic carnivorous plants. Carniv. Pl. Newslett.24: 50–53.
—. 1995b. Ecological requirements ofAldrovanda vesiculosa L. Testing of its new potential sites in the Czech Republic. Acta Bot. Gallica142: 673–680.
-. 1997. Photosynthetic characteristic of the aquatic carnivorous plantAldrovanda vesiculosa. Aquatic Bot. (in press).
—,K. Dušáková &M. Jonáčková. 1992. Growth effects of mineral nutrients applied to the substrate or onto the leaves in four carnivorous plant species. Carniv. Pl. Newslett.21:18–24.
Akeret, B. 1993. Ein neuer Fundort vonAldrovanda vesiculosa L. in der Nordschweiz und einige Bemerkungen zuStratiotes aloides L. Bot. Helv.103: 193–199.
Aldenius, J., B. Carlsson &S. Karlsson. 1983. Effects of insect trapping on growth and nutrient content ofPinguicula vulgaris L. in relation to the nutrient content of the substrate. New Phytol.93: 53–59.
Arts, G. H. P. &R. S. E. W. Leuven. 1988. Floristic changes in shallow soft waters in relation to underlying environmental factors. Freshwater Biol.20: 97–111.
Ashida, J. 1937. Studies on the leaf movement ofAldrovanda vesiculosa L. III. Reaction time in relation to temperature. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)51: 505–513.
Ashley, T. &J. F. Gennaro. 1971. Fly in the sundew. Nat. Hist.80: 80–85.
Chandler, G. E. &J. W. Anderson. 1976a. Studies on the nutrition and growth ofDrosera species with reference to the carnivorous habit. New Phytol.76:129–141.
—. 1976b. Uptake and metabolism of insect metabolites by leaves and tentaclesof Drosera species. New Phytol.77: 625–634.
Chapin, C. T. &J. Pastor. 1995. Nutrient limitations in the northern pitcher plantSarracenia purpurea. Canad. J. Bot.73: 728–734.
Christensen, N. L. 1976. The role of carnivory inSarracenia flava L. with regard to specific nutrient deficiencies. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.92:144–147.
Crawford, R. M. M. 1989. Studies in plant survival. Vol. 11in Studies in ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
Darwin, C. 1875. Insectivorous plants. Murray, London.
Dixon, K. W., J. S. Pate &W. J. Bailey. 1980. Nitrogen nutrition of the tuberous sundewDrosera erythrorhiza Lindl. with special reference to catch of arthropod fauna by its glandular leaves. Austral. J. Bot.28: 283–297.
Dykyjová, D. 1979. Selective uptake of mineral ions and their concentration factors in aquatic higher plants. Folia Geobot. Phytotax.14: 267–325.
Eleuterius, L. N. &S. B. Jones Jr. 1969. A floristic and ecological study of pitcher plant bogs in south Mississippi. Rhodora71:29–34.
Fabian-Galan, G. &N. Salageanu. 1968. Considerations on the nutrition of certain carnivorous plants (Drosera capensis andAldrovanda vesiculosa). Rev. Roumaine Biol. Sér. Bot.13: 275–280.
Fraser, D., J. K. Morton &P. Y. Jui. 1986. Aquatic vascular plants in Sibley Provincial Park in relation to water chemistry and other factors. Canad. Field Naturalist100:15–21.
Friday, L. E. 1989. Rapid turnover of traps inUtricularia vulgaris L. Oecologia80: 272–277.
— &C. Quarmby. 1994. Uptake and translocation of prey-derived15N and32P inUtricularia vulgaris L. New Phytol.126: 273–281.
Gibson, T. C. 1983. Competition, disturbance and the carnivorous plant community in the southeastern United States. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah.
Givnish, T. J., E. L. Burkhardt, R. E. Happel &J. D. Weintraub. 1984. Carnivory in the bromeliadBrocchinia reducta, with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist, nutrient-poor habitats. Amer. Naturalist124: 479–497.
Harder, R. 1963. Blütenbildung durch tierische Zusatznahrung und andere Faktoren beiUtricularia exoleta R. Braun. Planta59: 459–471.
—. 1970.Utricularia als Objekt für Heterotrophieuntersuchungen (Wechselwirkung von Saccharose und Acetat). Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Untersuch.63:181–184.
— &I. Zemlin. 1967. Förderung der Entwicklung und des Blühens vonPinguicula lusitanica durch Fütterung in axenischer Kultur. Planta73:181–193.
——. 1968. Blütenbildung vonPinguicula lusitanica in vitro durch Fütterung mit Pollen. Planta78: 72–78.
Hough, R. A. &M. D. Fornwall. 1988. Interactions of inorganic carbon and light availability as controlling factors in aquatic macrophyte distribution and productivity. Limnol. & Oceanogr.33: 1202–1208.
Jaffe, K., F. Michelangeli, J. M. Gonzalez, B. Miras &M. C. Ruiz. 1992. Carnivory in pitcher plants of the genusHeliamphora (Sarraceniaceae). New Phytol.122: 733–744.
Juniper, B. R., R. J. Robins &D. M. Joel. 1989. Carnivorous plants. Academic Press, London.
Kadono, Y. 1982. Occurrence of aquatic macrophytes in relation to pH, alkalinity, Ca++, Cl− and conductivity. Jap. J. Ecol.32: 39–44.
Kamiński, R. 1987a. Studies on the ecology ofAldrovanda vesiculosa L. I. Ecological differentiation ofA. vesiculosa population under the influence of chemical factors in the habitat. Ekol. Polska35: 559–590.
—. 1987b. Studies on the ecology ofAldrovanda vesiculosa L. II. Organic substances, physical and biotic factors and the growth and development ofA. vesiculosa. Ekol. Pol.35: 591–609.
Karlsson, P. S. 1988. Seasonal patterns of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium utilization by threePinguicula species. Fund. Ecol.2: 203–209.
— &J. S. Pate. 1992a. Contrasting effects of supplementary feeding of insects or mineral nutrients on the growth and nitrogen and phosphorus economy of pygmy species ofDrosera. Oecologia92: 8–13.
——. 1992b. Resource allocation to asexual gemma production and sexual reproduction in south-western Australian pygmy and micro stilt-form species of sundew (Drosera spp., Droseraceae). Austral. J. Bot.40: 353–364.
— &B. Carlsson. 1984. Why doesPinguicula vulgaris L. trap insects? New Phytol.97: 25–30.
—,K. O. Nordell, B. Carlsson &B. M. Svensson. 1991. The effect of soil nutrient status on prey utilization in four carnivorous plants. Oecologia86: 1–7.
——,S. Eirefelt &A. Svensson. 1987. Trapping efficiency of three carnivorousPinguicula species. Oecologia73: 518–521.
—,L. M. Thorén &H. M. Hanslin. 1994. Prey capture by threePinguicula species in a subarctic environment. Oecologia99: 188–193.
Knight, S. E. 1988. The ecophysiological significance of carnivory inUtricularia vulgaris. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin.
—. 1992. Costs of carnivory in the common bladderwort,Utricularia macrorhiza. Oecologia89: 348–355.
— &T. M. Frost. 1991. Bladder control inUtricularia macrorhiza: lake specific variation in plant investment in carnivory. Ecology72: 728–734.
Komiya, S. 1966. A report on the natural habitat ofAldrovanda vesiculosa found in Hanyu City. Amatores Herb. (Kobe, Japan)27: 5–13.
Kosiba, P. 1992a. Studies on the ecology ofUtricularia vulgaris L. I. Ecological differentiation ofUtricularia vulgaris L. population affected by chemical factors of the habitat. Ekol. Polska40: 147–192.
—. 1992b. Studies on the ecology ofUtricularia vulgaris L. II. Physical, chemical and biotic factors and the growth ofUtricularia vulgaris L. in culturesin vitro. Ekol. Polska40: 193–212.
—. 1993. [Ecological characteristic of the population ofUtricularia ochroleuca Hartmann andUtricularia neglecta Lehmann as well as their conditions of occurrence in Wegliniec] Acta Univ. Wratislav, Prace Bot.52: 25–32. [In Polish.]
— &J. Sarosiek. 1989. [The site ofUtricularia intermedia Hayne andUtricularia minor L. in Strzybnica near Tarnowskie Góry.] Acta Univ. Wratislav, Prace Bot.39: 71–78. [In Polish.]
Krafft, C. C. &S. N. Handel. 1991. The role of carnivory in the growth and reproduction ofDrosera filiformis andD. rotundifolia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club118: 12–19.
Lloyd F. E. 1942. The carnivorous plants. Chronica Botanica, Vol. 9. Waltham, Massachusetts.
Lollar, A. Q., D. C. Coleman &C. E. Boyd. 1971. Carnivorous pathway of phosphorus uptake byUtricularia inflata. Arch. Hydrobiol.69: 400–404.
Lüttge, U. 1964. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Carnivoren-Drüsen. III. Der Stoffwechsel der resorbierten Substanzen. Flora155: 228–236.
—. 1965. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Carnivoren-Drüsen. II. Mittteilung. Über die Resorption verschiedener Substanzen. Planta66: 331–334.
—. 1983. Ecophysiology of carnivorous plants. Pp. 489–517in O. L. Lange et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New ser. Vol. 12C. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Maberly, S. C. &D. H. N. Spence. 1983. Photosynthetic inorganic carbon use by freshwater plants. J. Ecol.71: 705–724.
Moeller, R. E. 1978. Carbon-uptake by the submerged hydrophyteUtricularia purpurea. Aquatic Bot.5: 209–216.
—. 1980. The temperature-determined growing season of a submerged hydrophyte: tissue chemistry and biomass turnover ofUtricularia purpurea. Freshwater Biol.10: 391–400.
Oosterhuis, J. 1927. [On the influence of insect feeding onDrosera.] Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. [In Dutch.]
Pate, J. S. &K. W. Dixon. 1978. Mineral nutrition ofDrosera erythrorhiza Lindl. with special reference to its tuberous habit. Austral. J. Bot.26: 455–464.
Plummer, G. L. &J. B. Kethley. 1964. Foliar absorption of amino-acids, peptides and other nutrients by the pitcher-plantSarracenia flava. Bot. Gaz.125: 245–260.
Pringsheim, E. G. &O. Pringsheim. 1967. Small contributions to the physiology ofUtricularia. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Untersuch.57: 1–10.
Reichte, D. E., M. H. Shanks &D. A. Crossley. 1969. Calcium, potassium and sodium content of forest floor arthropods. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer.62: 57–62.
Roberts, P. R. &H. J. Oosting. 1958. Responses of Venus fly trap (Dionaea muscipula) to factors involved in its endemism. Ecol. Monogr.28: 193–218.
Rychnovská-Soudková, M. 1953. [Study on mineral nutritionof Drosera rotundifolia L. I. Influence of calcium as an important physiological and ecological factor.] Preslia (Prague)25: 51–66. [In Czech.]
—. 1954. [Study on mineral nutrition ofDrosera rotundifolia L. II. Root sorption of inorganic nitrogen.] Preslia (Prague)26: 55–66. [In Czech.]
Schulze, E.-D., G. Gebauer, W. Schulze &J. S. Pate. 1991. The utilization of nitrogen from insect capture by different growth forms ofDrosera from Southwest Australia. Oecologia87: 240–246.
Schulze, W. &E.-D. Schulze. 1990. Insect capture and growth of the insectivorousDrosera rotundifolia L. Oecologia82: 427–429.
Schwintzer, C. R. 1978. Vegetation and nutrient status of northern Michigan fens. Canad. J. Bot.56: 3044–3051.
Shibata, C. &S. Komiya. 1972. Increase of nitrogen content in the leavesof Drosera rotundifolia fed with protein. Jap. Bull. Nippon Dental Coll., Gen. Educ.1: 55–75.
——. 1973. Changes of nitrogen content in the leaves ofDrosera rotundifolia during feeding with protein. Jap. Bull. Nippon Dental Coll., Gen. Educ2: 89–100.
Simola, L. K. 1978. The effect of several amino acids and some inorganic nitrogen sources on the growth ofDrosera rotundifolia in long- and short-day conditions. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Untersuch.90: 61–68.
Slater, F. M. 1981. The mineral contents of both peat and plants and their interrelationships at Borth Bog, Wales. Irish National Peat Communications. Proc. 7th Intl. Peat Congr.1: 450–467.
Small, J. G. C., A. Onraet, D. S. Grierson &G. Reynolds. 1977. Studies on insect-free growth, development and nitrate-assimilating enzymes ofDrosera aliciae Hamet. New Phytol.79: 127–133.
Sorenson, D. R. &W. T. Jackson. 1968. The utilization of paramecia by the carnivorous plantUtricularia gibba. Planta83: 166–170.
Stewart, C. N., Jr. &E. T. Nilsen. 1992.Drosera rotundifolia growth and nutrition in a natural population with special reference to the significance of insectivory. Canad. J. Bot.70: 1409–1416.
Studnička, M. 1991. Interesting succulent features in thePinguicula species from the Mexican evolutionary centre. Folia Geobot. Phytotax.26: 459–462.
Svensson, B. M. 1995. Competition betweenSphagnum fuscum andDrosera rotundifolia: a case of ecosystem engineering. Oikos74: 205–212.
Thum, M. 1988. The significance of carnivory for the fitness ofDrosera in its natural habitat. 1. The reactions ofDrosera intermedia andD. rotundifolia to supplementary feeding. Oecologia75: 472–480.
—. 1989a. The significance of opportunistic predators for the sympatric carnivorous plant speciesDrosera intermedia andDrosera rotundifolia. Oecologia81: 397–400.
—. 1989b. The significance of carnivory for the fitness ofDrosera in its natural habitat. 2. The amount of captured prey and its effect onDrosera intermedia andDrosera rotundifolia. Oecologia81: 401–411.
Watson, A. P., J. N. Matthiessen &B. P. Springett. 1982. Arthropod associates and macronutrient status of the red-ink sundew (Drosera erythrorhiza Lindl.). Austral. J. Ecol.7: 13–22.
Wilson, S. D. 1985. The growth ofDrosera intermedia in nutrient-rich habitats: the role of insectivory and interspecific competition. Canad. J. Bot.63: 2468–2469.
Wolfe, L. M. 1981. Feeding behavior of a plant: differential prey capture in old and new leaves of the pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea). Amer. Midl. Naturalist106: 352–359.
Zamora, R. 1990. Observational and experimental study of a carnivorous plant-ant kleptobiotic interaction. Oikos59: 368–372.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adamec, L. Mineral nutrition of carnivorous plants: A review. Bot. Rev 63, 273–299 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857953
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857953