Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of inoculum dose and preparation, strain variation, and plant growth conditions on the eggplant assay for bacterial ring rot

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative differences among strains ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum (Spieck. and Kotth.) Skapt. and Burkh. (=Clavibacter michiganense subsp.sepedonicum) were distinguished in eggplant (Solanum melongena L. ‘Black Beauty’) bioassays with a simple leaf axil inoculation technique. Latent period of infection (time from inoculation to first appearance of symptoms) varied inversely with inoculum dose. Latent period of infection varied significantly among strains ofC. sepedonicum. Symptoms developed more rapidly in plants grown under controlled conditions in a growth chamber than those grown in a greenhouse. Plants treated with inoculum prepared from broth cultures exhibited symptoms more rapidly than those treated with inoculum grown on agar.

Resumen

Se encontraron diferencias cuantitativas entre las variantes de Corynebacterium sepedonicum (Spieck y Kotth) Skapt. y Burkh. (=clavibacter michiganense) subsp.sepedonicum, al efectuar pruebas biológicas utilizando la prueba simple de inoculación de la bacteria en la axila de las hojas de plantas de berenjena (Solanum melongena L. ‘Black Beauty’). El período latente de infección (tiempo transcurrido desde la inoculación hasta la aparición de los primeros síntomas) varió en relación inversa con la dosis del inóculo. El período latente de infección varió significativamente entres las variantes deC. sepedonicum. Los síntomas se desarrollaron más rápidamente en las plantas creciendo bajo condiciones controladas en una cámara de crecimiento que en aquellas que crecían en un invernadero.

Las plantas tratadas con inóculo obtenido en caldo de cultivo mostraron síntomas más rápidamente que aquellas tratadas con inóculo producido sobre agar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Crowley, C.F. and S.H. De Boer. 1982. Nonpathogenic bacteria associated with potato stems cross-react withCorynebacterium sepedonicum antisera in immunofluorescence. Am Potato J 59:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, M.J., A.G. Gillespie, Jr., A.K. Vidaver and R.W. Harris. 1984.Clavibacter: a new genus containing some phytopathogenic coryneform bacteria, includingClavibacter xyli subsp.xyli sp. nov., subsp. nov., andClavibacter xyli subsp.cyonodontis subsp. nov., pathogens that cause ratoon stunting disease of sugarcane and Bermudagrass stunting disease. Int J Syst Bacteriol 34:107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Boer, S.H. and R.J. Copeman. 1974. Endophytic bacterial flora inSolanum tuberosum and its significance in bacterial ring rot diagnosis. Can J Plant Sci 54:115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Boer, S.H. and R.J. Copeman. 1980. Bacterial ring rot testing with the indirect fluorescent antibody staining procedure. Am Potato J 57:457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ercolani, G.L. and J.E. Crosse. 1966. The growth ofPseudomonas phaseolicola and related plant pathogensin vivo. J Gen Microbiol 45:429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoagland, D.R. and D.I. Arnon. 1938. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Stn Circ 347, 39 pp.

  7. Lelliott, R.A. and P.W. Sellar. 1976. The detection of latent ring rot (Corynebacterium sepedonicum [Spieck. et Kotth.] Skapt. et Burkh.) in potato stocks. EPPO Bull 6:101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manzer, F. and S.A. Slack. 1979. Report of the pathology section committee on bacterial ring rot diagnosis. Am Potato J 56:551–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meynell, G.G. and E.W. Meynell. 1958. The growth of microorganismsin vivo with particular reference to the relation between dose and latent period. J Hyg 56:323–346.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Raciot, H.N., D.B.O. Saville and I.L. Conners. 1938. Bacterial wilt and rot of potatoes— some suggestions for its detection, verification and control. Am Potato J 15:312–318.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slack, S.A., A. Kelman and J.W. Perry. 1978. Comparison of three serodiagnostic assays for detection ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum. Phytopathology 69:186–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Slack, S.A., H.A. Sanford and F.E. Manzer. 1979. The latex agglutination test as a rapid serological assay forCorynebacterium sepedonicum. Am Potato J 56:441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vidaver, A.K. 1967. Synthetic and complex media for the rapid detection of fluorescence of phytopathogenic pseudomonads: Effect of the carbon source. Appl Microbiol 15:1523–1524.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Winstead, N.N. and A. Kelman. 1952. Inoculation techniques for evaluating resistance toPseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 42:628–634.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zeller, W. and Y. Xie. 1985. Studies of diagnosis of bacterial ring rot of potatoes I. Pathogenicity test in eggplants. Phytopathol Z 112:198–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Former Graduate Research Assistant

This work was supported in part by the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and by a grant from the Wisconsin Potato Industry Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bishop, A.L., Slack, S.A. Effect of inoculum dose and preparation, strain variation, and plant growth conditions on the eggplant assay for bacterial ring rot. American Potato Journal 64, 227–234 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853560

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853560

Key Words

Navigation