Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of transitory water stress on potato tuber stem-end reducing sugar and fry color

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Potatoes grown for processing in irrigated regions of the Pacific North-west sometimes develop undesirably high concentrations of reducing sugars in tuber stem ends due to hot weather and water stress during tuber development. Such tubers usually produce french fries with dark stem ends or sugar ends. In order to better quantify the relationship between water stress and stem-end sugar levels for Russet Burbank, single episodes of transitory water stress were established by delaying irrigations until soil water potentials ranging from -32 to -107 kPa were reached during early tuber bulking. To determine when the increase in reducing sugars occurred, tubers were sampled before transitory stress, at maximum stress, after stress was relieved with sprinkler irrigation, and post harvest. Reducing sugar concentrations did not increase in tuber stem ends until two weeks or longer after the plant water stress was relieved. Increased reducing sugar concentrations were positively associated with decreased soil water potential (drier soil). Tubers were sliced and fried at harvest and six weeks post-harvest. Decreasing soil water potential (drier soil) was associated with progressively darker fry colors at harvest and post harvest. Significant darkening in the average stem-end fry color light reflectance of tubers at harvest as observed at -80 kPa in 1988 and -69 kPa in 1989. The effect of imposed water stress on tuber stem-end reducing sugar concentrations was most pronounced post harvest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Eldredge, E.P. and C.C. Shock. 1990. Comparison of hydraulic press and pressure chamber estimates of potato leaf water potential. Am Potato J 67: 307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eldredge, E.P., C.C. Shock, and T.D. Stieber. 1992. Plot sprinklers for irrigation research. Agronomy J 84: 1081–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eldredge, E.P., C.C. Shock, and T.D. Stieber. 1993. Calibration of granular matrix sensors for irrigation management. Agronomy J 85: 1228–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hane, D.C, and F.V. Pumphrey. 1984. Yield-evapotranspiration relationships and seasonal crop coefficients for frequently irrigated potatoes. Am Potato J 61: 661–668.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hiller, L.K., D.C. Koller, and R.E. Thornton. 1985. Physiological disorders of potato tubers.In: P.H. Li (ed.) Potato Physiology. Academic Press, New York. pp. 389–443.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iritani, W.M., L. Weiler, and T.S. Russell. 1973a. Relative differences in sugar content of basal and apical portions of Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J 50: 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iritani, W.M. and L. Weller. 1973b. The development of translucent end tubers. Am Potato J 50: 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iritani, W.M. and L. Weller. 1973c. Dry matter content of apical and basal portions of Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J 50: 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iritani, W.M. 1981. Growth and preharvest stress and processing quality of potatoes. Am Potato J 58: 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lugt, C. 1960. Second-growth phenomena. Eur Potato J 3: 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, M.W. and D.E. Miller. 1983. Variations in responses of potato germplasm to deficit irrigation as affected by soil texture. Am Potato J 60: 671–683.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, D.E. and M.W. Martin. 1987. Effect of declining or interrupted irrigation on yield and quality of three potato Cultivars grown on sandy soil. Am Potato J 64: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nielson, L.W. and W.C. Sparks. 1953. Bottleneck tubers and jelly-end rot in the Russet Burbank potato. Res Bull No 23 Univ of Idaho Agric Expt Stat.

  14. Penman, F. 1929. Glassy end of potatoes. J Dept of Agric Victoria 27: 449.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross, A.F. 1959. Dinitrophenol method for reducing sugars.In: “Potato processing”. Talburt, W.F. and Ora Smith (ed). AVI Publishing Co., Westport, Conn. p. 588.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shock, C.C., T.D. Stieber, J.P. Zalewski, E.P. Eldredge, and M.D. Lewis. 1994. Potato tuber stem-end fry color determination. Am Potato J 71: 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shock, C.C., Z.A. Holmes, T.D. Stieber, E.P. Eldredge, and P. Zhang. 1993. The effect of timed water stress on quality, total solids and reducing sugar content of potatoes. Am Potato J 70: 227–241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weaver, M.L., E. Hautala, M. Nonaka, and W. M. Iritani. 1972. Sugar-end in Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J 49: 376–382.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Paper Number 10,310.

Former Graduate Research Assistant, Oregon State University. This work was submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. in Crop Science, 2417 Sunset Drive, Ontario, OR 97914.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eldredge, E.P., Holmes, Z.A., Mosley, A.R. et al. Effects of transitory water stress on potato tuber stem-end reducing sugar and fry color. American Potato Journal 73, 517–530 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851697

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851697

Additional Key Words

Navigation