Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of hydraulic press and pressure chamber estimates of potato leaf water potential1

  • Short communication
  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The leaf water potential of field-grown Russet Burbank potato plants (Solarium tuberosum L.) was estimated with a pressure chamber and a leaf press to assess the usefulness of the leaf press for evaluation of potato leaf water status.

Paired leaflets were used for leaf water potential estimation with both instruments. Leaflets were taken from potato plants exposed to excessive soil moisture and high relative humidity, from plants with adequate soil moisture, and from plants under severe water stress.

Over the range from -0.28 to -1.61 MPa, for 124 leaflet pairs, the leaf press estimates of leaf water potential were exponentially related (r2 = 0.85) to pressure chamber estimates. The leaf press compared well with the pressure chamber in the range from -0.6 to -1.2 MPa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Boyer, J.S. and S.R. Ghorashy. 1971. Rapid field measurement of leaf water potential in soybean. Agron J 63:344–345.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bristow, K.L., W.H. Van Zyl and J.M. De Jager. 1981. Measurement of leaf water potential using the J14 press. J Exp Bot 32:851–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gandar, RW. and C.B. Tanner. 1975. Comparison of methods for measuring leaf and tuber water potential in potatoes. Am Potato J 52:387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gandar, RW. and C.B. Tanner. 1976. Potato leaf and tuber water potential measurements with a pressure chamber. Am Potato J 53:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gandar, RW. and C.B. Tanner. 1976. Leaf growth, tuber growth, and water potential in potatoes. Crop Sci 16:534–538.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grant, R.F., M.J. Savage and J.D. Lea. 1981. Comparison of hydraulic press, thermocouple psychrometer, and pressure chamber for the measurement of total and osmotic leaf water potential in soybeans. S Afric J Sci 77:398–400.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hicks, S.K., R.J. Lascano, C.W. Wendt and A.B. Onken. 1986. Use of a hydraulic press for estimation of leaf water potential in grain sorghum. Agron J 78:749–751.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt, E.R., J.A. Weber and D.M. Gates. 1984. Differences between tree species in hydraulic press calibration of leaf water potential are correlated with specific leaf area. Plant Cell Environ 7:597–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, C.A. and A. Carabaly. 1980. Estimation of leaf water potential in tropical grasses with the Campbell-Brewster hydraulic press. Trop Agric 57:305–307.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Markhart, A.H. and B. Smit-Spinks. 1984. Comparison of J14 hydraulic press with the Scholander pressure bomb for measuring leaf water potential. HortScience 19:52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Radulovich, R.A., C.J. Phene, K.R. Davis and J.R. Brownell. 1982. Comparison of water stress of cotton from measurements with the hydraulic press and the pressure chamber. Agron J 74:383–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajendrudu, G., M. Singh and J.H. Williams. 1983. Hydraulic press measurements of leaf water potential in groundnuts. Exp Agric 19:287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Renard, C. and V. Ndayishimie. 1982. Étude des relations hydriques chezCoffea arabica L. I. Comparaison de la presse à membrane et de la chambre à pression pour la mesure du potentiel hydrique foliaire. Café Cacao Thé 26:27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shayo-Ngowi, A. and G.S. Campbell. 1980. Measurement of matric potential in plant tissue with a hydraulic press. Agron J 72:567–568.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sojka, R.E., E.J. Sadler, C.R. Camp and F.B. Arnold. 1987. Comparison of Campbell leaf-press with standard plant water stress measurements for four species.In: Proceedings of International Conference on Measurement of Soil and Plant Water Status, July 6-10, 1987, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Volume 2-Plants p. 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Turner, N.C. and M.L. Long. 1980. Errors arising from rapid water loss in the measurement of leaf water potential by the pressure chamber technique. Aust J Plant Phys 7:527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wenkert, W., E.R. Lemon and T.R. Sinclair. 1978. Changes in water potential during pressure bomb measurement. Agron J 70:353–355.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yegappan, T.M. and B.J. Mainstone. 1981. Comparisons between press and pressure chamber techniques for measuring leaf water potential. Exp Agric 17:75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Approved for publication by Oregon State University Agricultural Communications as technical paper No. 9040. Research supported in part by the Oregon Potato Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eldredge, E.P., Shock, C.C. Comparison of hydraulic press and pressure chamber estimates of potato leaf water potential1. American Potato Journal 67, 307–312 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987272

Additional Key Words

Navigation