Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of terbutaline and salbutamol inhalation in children with mild or moderate acute exacerbation of asthma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and side effects of terbutaline and salbutamol administered by metered dose inhaler and holding chamber in the mild to moderate acute exacerbations of asthma in children.Methods: The study subjects were children in the age group of 5–15 years who presented with a mild or moderate acute exacerbation of asthma. Baseline assessment included clinical parameters and spirometry. The children were then randomized to receive salbutamol or terbutaline. Three puffs each of either 100 mcg salbutamol or 250 mcg of terbutaline were administered using 750 ml holding chamber with valve. Thirty minutes after drug administration, the children were reevaluated for clinical parameters and spirometry.Results: Of the total 60 subjects studied, 31 were administered terbutaline and 29 salbutamol. The baseline spirometric parameters were comparable. After drug administration, all the studied variables showed significant improvement within each group. However, there were no statistically significant differences when the two groups were compared with each other. There was no significant difference in the side effects between two groups.Conclusion: Terbutaline and salbutamol, when administered by MDI with holding chamber, are equally efficacious in children with mild or moderate acute exacerbation of asthma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simmonson BG, Sittska J, Strom B. Double-blind trial with increasing doses of salbutamol and terbutaline aerosols in patients with reversible airways obstruction.Acta Med Scand 1972; 192: 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Capecchi V, Cavalli F, Falcoone Fet al. Comparison of terbutaline and salbutamol aerosols in patients with bronchial asthma.Int J Clin Pharmacol 1978; 16: 310.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris L. Comparison of cardiorespiratory effects of terbutaline and salbutamol aerosols in patients with reversible airways obstruction.Thorax 1973; 28: 592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scalabrin DMF, Sole D, Naspitz CK. Efficacy and side-effects of beta2-agonists by inhaled route in acute asthma in children: Comparison of salbutamol, terbutaline and fenoterol.J Asthma 1996; 33: 407–415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oldaeus G, Kubista J, Stahl E. Comparison of bricanyl turbuhaler and ventolin rotahaler in children with asthma.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1995; 74: 34–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Warner JO, Naspitz CK. Third International Pediatric Consensus statement on the management of childhood asthma. International Pediatric Asthma Consensus Group.Pediatr Pulmonol 1998; 25: 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bierman CW, Pearlman DS. Asthma-average (50%) pulmonary values in children. In, Kendig EL, Chernick V, eds.Disorders of the respiratory tract in children. 4th Edition, Philadelphia, WB Saunders & Company, 1983; 521.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simonsson BG, Stiksa J, Strom B. Double-blind trial with increasing doses of salbutamol and terbutaline aerosols in patients with reversible airways obstruction.Acta Med Scand 1972; 192: 371–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ploin D, Chapuis FR, Stamm D, Robert J, David L, Chatelain PGet al. High-dose albuterol by metered-dose inhaler plus a spacer device versus nebulization in preschool children with recurrent wheezing: A double-blind, randomized equivalence trial.Pediatrics 2000; 106: 311–317.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leversha AM, Campanella SG, Aickin RP, Asher MI. Costs and effectiveness of spacer versus nebulizer in young children with moderate and severe acute asthma.J Pediatr 2000; 136: 497–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindsay DA, Russell NL, Thompson JE, Warnock TH, Shellshear ID, Buchanan PR. A multicentre comparison of the efficacy of terbutaline Turbuhaler and salbutamol pressurized metered dose inhaler in hot, humid regions.Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 342–345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Towns SJ, Sharota E, Simpson SJ, Mellis CM. Bronchodilator effects of salbutamol powder administered via Rotahaler and of terbutaline aerosol administered via Misthaler. A comparison study in children with asthma.Med J Aust 1983; 1: 633–636.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. dos Santos JM, Costa H, Stahl E, Wiren JE. Bricanyl Turbuhaler and Ventolin Rotahaler in exercise-induced asthma in children.Allergy 1991; 46: 203–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bai TR. Mechanisms of action of β2 agonists and short acting β2 therapy. In, Fitzgerald JM, Ernst P, Boulet LP, O’Byrne PM eds.Evidence Based Asthma Management. Hamilton, BC Dekker Inc., 2001; 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Kabra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandra, P., Paliwal, L., Lodha, R. et al. Comparison of terbutaline and salbutamol inhalation in children with mild or moderate acute exacerbation of asthma. Indian J Pediatr 71, 961–963 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02828104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02828104

Key words

Navigation