Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis and development of conceptual rainfall-runoff model structures for regionalisation purposes

  • Water Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper attempts to investigate, in detail, the behaviour of the selected conceptual rainfall runoff model structures (a Pen manbased model and a probability distribution-based model) by using a novel method of dynamic parameter identifiability analysis (DYNIA). Two UK catchments were used as case studies. This paper shows that potential weaknesses of model structures are uncovered by this analysis; a) the optimum parameter shifts over the time domain, and b) insensitive model parameters shift over the wet period and dry period. However, attempting to interpret these results, and use them as a basis for improving the model structure proved difficult. The dynamic relationships between the model parameter and the variable soil moisture state in the model have been considered based on these analyses. Possible model modifications have been suggested: a) Making the proportion of rainfall that bypasses the soil stores responsive to soil wetness, rather than a constant, and b) Directing this bypassed rain fall to the fas trouting reservoirs rather than splitting it between fast and slow reservoirs. However, substantial and well-founded changes in the model structures had marginal effect on the time-series output. The lack of improved performance raises a number of questions and points the way forward for more research. The results may suggest that improvement of the model performance depends more on the quality of data (or catchment information) rather than the hydrological representation of the different catchments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beven, K.J. and Binley, A.M. (1992). “The future of distributed models; model calibration and predictive uncertainty.”Hydrological Processes, Vol. 6, pp. 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven, K. (1993). “Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling.”Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 16, pp. 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, W. (2005). “Catchment water balance modelling in Australia 1960–2004.”Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 77, pp. 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B. (1996). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach.”Water Resources Research. Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 2161–2173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, G.M. and Spear, R.C. (1981). “An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems.”Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 12, pp. 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of hydrology (IH) (1999) Flood Estimation Handbook, Wallingford, UK.

  • Jakeman, A.J. and Hornberger, G.M. (1993). “How Much Complexity is warranted in a Rainfall-runoff model?”Water Resources Research, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 2637–2649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, T. (1995).Large-scale hydrological modeling—The development and validation of improved land-surface parameterizations for meteorological input. PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkonen, T.S. and Jakeman, A.J. (2001). “A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling and its implications.”Water Resources Research, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 2345–2352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R. (1999). “Calibration of a conceptual rainfall—runoff model for flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation.”Water Resources Research, Vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 3103–3114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., McIntyre, N.R., Wheater, H.S., and Young, A.R. (2005). “Selection of conceptual models for regionalisation of rainfall-runoff relationships.”Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 312, No. 1–4, pp. 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, J.J. (2003). “Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variabel source area concept of rainfall-runoff response.”Hydrological Processes, Vol. 17, pp. 1869–1875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (1985). “The probability-distributed principle and runoff prediction at point and basin scales.”Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman, H. L. (1949). “The dependence of transpiration on weather and soil conditions.”Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 1, pp. 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andreassian, V. (2001). “Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments.”Jounal of Hydrology, Vol. 242, pp. 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perin, C., Michel, C., and Andreassian, V. (2003). Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation.Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 279, pp. 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senbetaa, D., Shamseldinb, A., and O’Connorc, K. (1999) “Modification of the probability-distributed interacting storage capacity model.”Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 224, pp. 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. (1994). Hydrology in practice, third Edition. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, R. and Hornberger, G. (1980). “Eutrophication in Peel Inlet—II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis.”Water Research, Vol. 14, pp. 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, T., Kosugi, K., and Mizuyama, T. (2001). “Effects of pipeflow on hydrological process and its relation to landslide: a review of pipeflow studies in forested headwater catchments.”Hydrological Processes, Vol. 15, pp. 2151–2174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagener, T. (2002).Identification of parsimonious rainfall runoff models for gauged and ungauged catchments. PhD Dissertation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener, T., Wheater, H., and Gupta, H. (2004). Rainfall-runoff modelling in gaged and ungaged catchments. Imperial College Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheater, H.S., Jakeman, A.J., and Beven, K., (1993). Progress and destinations in rainfall-runoff modelling. In: A.J. Jakeman, M.B. Beck and M.J. McAleer (Editors), Modelling Change in Environmental Systems. John Wiley and sons, Chicester, pp. 101–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheater, H.S. (2002). Progress in and prospects for fluvial flood modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 360, No. 1796, pp. 1409–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Il Moon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H., Moon, YI. Analysis and development of conceptual rainfall-runoff model structures for regionalisation purposes. KSCE J Civ Eng 11, 57–64 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823373

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823373

Keywords

Navigation