Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nutrient over-enrichment has resulted in major changes in the coastal ecosystems of developed nations in Europe, North America, Asia, and Oceania, mostly taking place over the narrow period of 1960 to 1980. Many estuaries and embayments are affected, but the effects of this eutrophication have been also felt over large areas of semi-enclosed seas including the Baltic, North, Adriatic, and Black Seas in Europe, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Seto Inland Sea in Japan. Primary production increased, water clarity decreased, food chains were altered, oxygen depletion of bottom waters developed or expanded, seagrass beds were lost, and harmful algal blooms occurred with increased frequency. This period of dramatic alteration of coastal ecosystems, mostly for the worse from a human perspective, coincided with the more than doubling of additions of fixed nitrogen to the biosphere from human activities, driven particularly by a more than 5-fold increase in use of manufactured fertilizers during that 20-year period. Nutrient over-enrichment often interacted synergistically with other human activities, such as overfishing, habitat destruction, and other forms of chemical pollution, in contributing to the widespread degradation of coastal ecosystems that was observed during the last half of the 20th century. Science was effective in documenting the consequences and root causes of nutrient over-enrichment and has provided the basis for extensive efforts to abate it, ranging from national statutes and regulations to multijurisdictional compacts under the Helsinki Commission for the Baltic Sea, the Oslo-Paris Commission for the North Sea, and the Chesapeake Bay Program, for example. These efforts have usually been based on a relatively arbitrary goal of reducing nutrient inputs by a certain percentage, without much understanding of how and when this would affect the coastal ecosystem. While some of these efforts have succeeded in achieving reductions of inputs of phosphorus and nitrogen, principally through treatment of point-source discharges, relatively little progress has been made in reducing diffuse sources of nitrogen. Second-generation management goals tend to be based on desired outcomes for the coastal ecosystem and determination of the load reductions needed to attain them, for example the Total Daily Maximum Load approach in the U.S. and the Water Franmework Directive in the European Union. Science and technology are now challenged not just to diagnose the degree of eutrophication and its causes, but to contribute to its prognosis and treatment by determining the relative susceptibility of coastal ecosystems to nutrient over-enrichment, defining desirable and achievable outcomes for rehabilitation efforts, reducing nutrient sources, enhancing nutrient sinks, strategically targeting these efforts within watersheds, and predicting and observing responses in an adaptive management framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alexander, R. B., R. A. Smith, andG. E. Schwartz. 2000. Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gultf of Mexico.Nature 403:758–761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. andL. Rydberg. 1988. Trends in nutrient and oxygen conditions within the Kattegat: Effects of local nutrient supply.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 26:559–579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, H. 1999. Estimation of the nutrient inputs into medium and large river basins: A case study for German rivers.LOICZ Newsletter 12:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F. andR. B. Brinsfield. 2000. Coastal eutrophication and agriculture: Contributions and solutions, p. 93–115.In: E. Balázs, E. Galante, J. M. Lynch, J. S. Schepers, J. P. Toutant, E. Werner, and P. A. Th. J. Werry (eds.), Biological Resource Management: Connecting Science and Policy. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F., R. Brinsfield, andR. Magnien. 2001a. Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture.Journal of Environmental Quality 30:303–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D., E. Burreson, W. Dennison, E. Houde, M. Kemp, V. Kennedy, R. Newell, K. Paynter, R. Orth, andR. Ulanowicz. 2001b. Factors in the decline of coastal ecosystems.Science 293:1589–1590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. B. andC. R. Jackson. 1997. Urbanization of aquatic systems: Degradation thresholds, stormwater detention, and the limits of mitigation.Journal of American Water Resources Association 33:1077–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bricker, S. B., C. G. Clement, D. E. Pirhalla, S. P. Orlando, andD. F. G. Farrow. 1999. National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment: Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation’s Estuaries. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caddy, J. F. 1993. Towards a comparative evaluation of human impacts on fishery ecosystems of enclosed and semi-enclosed seas.Reviews in Fisheries Sciences 1:57–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caddy, J. F. 2000. Marine catchment basin effects versus impacts of fisheries on semi-enclosed seas.ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:628–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Environment and Natural Resources (CENR) 2000. Integrated Assessment of Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E. 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem.Marine Ecology Progress Series 210: 223–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, T. A., L. L. DeLong, E. J. Gilroy, R. M. Hirsch, andR. M. Wells. 1989. Estimating constituent loads.Water Resources Research 25:937–942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colijn, R. andK. Reise. 2001. Transboundary issues: Consequences for the Wadden Sea, p. 51–70.In B. von Bodungen and R. K. Turner (eds.). Science and Integrated Coastal Management. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D. J. 2000. Biogeochemical nutrient cycles and nutrient management strategies.Hydrobiologica 410:87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D. J., H. Kaas, F. Møhlenberg, B. Rasmussen, andJ. Wildolf, 2000. Characteristics of Danish estuaries.Estuaries 23:848–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D. J., S. Markager, J. Andersen, T. Ellermann, andL. M. Svendsen. 2002. Danish National Aquatic Monitoring and Assessment Program.Estuaries 25:848–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. R. 1995. Chesapeake Bay watershed historical land use: Impact on water quality and diatom communities.Ecological Applications 5:703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, J. C., D. J. Conley, M. Owens, andJ. C. Stevenson. 1996. A sediment chronology of the eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay.Estuaries 19:488–499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corredor, J. E., R. W. Howarth, R. R. Twilley, andJ. M. Morell. 1999. Nitrogen cycling and anthropogenic impact in the tropical internamerican seas.Biogeochemistry 46:163–178.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., A. Voinov, R. Boumans, T. Maxwell, F. Villa, L. Wainger, andH. Voinov. 2002. Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent River watershed, Maryland.Ecological Monographs 72:203–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouzet, P., J. Leonard, S. Nixon, Y. Rees, W. Parr, L. Laffon, J. Bøgestrand, P. Kristensen, C. Lallana, G. Izzo, T. Bokn, andJ. Bak. 1999. Nutrients in European Ecosystems. Environmental Assessment Report 4. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettmann, E. H. 2001. Effect of water residence time on annual export and denitrification of nitrogen in estuaries: A mode analysis.Estuaries 24:481–490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elmgren, R. 2001. Understanding human impact on the Baltic ecosystem: Changing views in recent decades.Ambio 30:222–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elmgren, R. andU. Larsson. 2001. Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea area: Integrated coastal management issues, p. 15–35.In B. von Bodungen and R. K. Turner (eds) Science and Integrated Coastal Management. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. R., A. B. Gustafson, K. Sellner, R. Lacouture, L. W. Haas, R. L. Wetzel, R. Magnien, D. Everitt, B. Michaels, andR. Karrh. 1999. Spatial and temporal variation of resource limitation in Chesapeake Bay.Marine Biology 133:763–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, H. andC. Elfring. 2002. Local, state, regional and federal roles in coastal nutrient management.Estuaries 25: 838–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. 1990. Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagy, J. D. 2002. Eutrophication, hypoxia and trophic transfer efficiency in Chesapeake Bay. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Jr.,L. H., D. Degobbis, andR. Precali. 1999. Production and fate of phytoplankton: Annual cycles and interannual variability, p. 131–172.In T. C. Malone, A. Malej, L. W. Harding, Jr., N. Smodlaka, and R. E. Turner(eds). Ecosystems at the Land-Sea Margin: Drainage Basin to Coastal Sea. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. W., G. Billen, D. Swaney, A. Townsend, N. Jaworski, K. Lajtha, J. A. Downing, R. Elmgren, N. Caraco, T. Jorden, F. Berendse, J. Freney, V. Kudeyarov, P. Murdoch, andZ. Zhao-Liang 1996. Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine nitrogen and phosphorus fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences.Biogeochemistry 35:75–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. B. C., M. X. Kirby, W. H. Berger, K. A. Bjordnal, L. W. Botsford, B. J. Bourque, R. H. Bradbury, R. Cooke, J. Erlandson, J. A. Estes, T. P. Hughes, S. Kidwell, C. B. Lange, H. S. Lenihan, J. M. Pandolfi, C. H. Peterson, R. S. Steneck, M. J. Tegner, andR. R. Warner. 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems.Science 293:629–638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, B.-O. andK. Dahlberg. 1999. The environmental status of the Baltic Sea in the 1940s, today and in the future.Ambio 28:312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, N. A. 1990. Retrospective of the water quality issues of the upper Potomac estuary.Aquatic Science 3:11–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson J. O. andH. S. Greening. 2000. Seagrass restoration in Tampa Bay: A resource-based approach to estuarine management, p. 279–293.In S. Bortone (ed.). Seagrasses: Monitoring, Ecology, Physiology and Management CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justić, D., T. Legović, andL. Rottini-Sandrini 1987. Trends in oxygen content 1911–1984 and occurrence of benthic mortility in the northern Adriatic Sea.Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 25:435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justić, D., N. N. Rabalais, andR. E. Turner. 1996. Effects of climate change on hypoxia in coastal waters: A doubled CO2 scenario for the northern Gulf of Mexico.Limnology and Oceanography 41:992–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justić, D., N. N. Rabalais, R. E. Turner, andQ. Dortch. 1995. Changes in nutrient structure of river-dominated coastal waters: Stoichiometric nutrient balance and its consequences.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 40:339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, A. W., T. M. Cronin, S. E. Ishman, D. A. Willard, C. W. Holmes, M. Marot, andR. Kerhin. 2000. Historical trends in Chesapeake Bay dissolved oxygen based on benthic Foraminifera from sediment cores.Estuaries 23:488–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, III,R. R., P. A. Clark, W. K. Fehring, H. S. Greening, R. O. Johansson, andR. T. Paul. 1998. The rehabilitation of the Tampa Bay estuary, Florida, USA, as an example of successful integrated coastal management.Marine Pollution Bulletin 37:468–473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linker, L., C. Stigall, C. Chang, andA. Donigian, 1996. Aquatic accounting: Chesapeake Bay watershed model quantifies nutrient loads.Water Environment and Technology 8:48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long Island Sound Study. 1998. Phase III Actions for Hypoxia Management. EPA Long Island Sound Office. Stony Brook, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. C., A. Malej, L. W. Harding, Jr.,N. Smodlaka, andR. E. Turner (eds.) 1999. Ecosystems at the Land-Sea Margin: Drainage Basin to Coastal Sea. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComb, A. J. (ed.). 1995. Eutrophic Shallow Estuaries and Lagoons. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIsaac, G. F., M. B. David, G. Z. Gertner, andD. A. Goolsby. 2001. Nitrate flux in the Mississippi River.Nature 414:166–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mee, L. D. 2001. Eutrophication in the Black Sea and a basin-wide approach to its control, p. 71–91.In B. von Bodungen and R. K. Turner (eds.). Science and Integrated Coastal Management. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheli, F. 1998. Eutrophication, fisheries, and consumer-resource dynamics in marine pelagic ecosystemsScience 285: 1396–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. andJ. G. Gosselink 2000. Wetlands, 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J., J. W. Day, Jr.,J. W. Gilliam, P. M. Groffman, D. L. Hey, G. W. Randall, andN. Wang. 2001. Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin: Strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem.BioScience 51:373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najjar, R. G., H. A. Walker, P. J. Anderson, E. J. Barro, R. J. Bord, J. R. Gibso, V. S. Kennedy, C. G. Knight, J. P. Megonigal, R. E. O’Connor, C. D. Polsky, N. P. Psuty, B. A. Richards, L. G. Sorenson, E. M. Steele, andR. S. Swanson. 2000. The potential impacts of climate change on the mid-Atlantic coastal region.Climate Research 14:219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). 1999. New Strategies for America’s Watersheds. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Clean Coastal Waters: Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) 2001. Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. I. E., J. C. Cornwell, and M. S. Owens. 2002. Influence of simulated bivalve biodeposition and microphytobenthos on sediment nutrient dynamics: A laboratory study.Limnology and Oceanography 47.

  • Nixon, S. W. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns.Ophelia 41:199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W. 1997. Prehistoric nutrient inputs and productivity of Narragansett Bay.Estuaries 20:253–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J. andK. A. Moore. 1983. Chesapeake Bay: Unprecedented decline in submerged aquatic vegetation.Science 222: 51–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paerl, H. W., R. L. Dennis, andD. R. Whitall. 2002. Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen: Implications for nutrient overenrichment of coastal waters.Estuaries 25:677–693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. J., W. M. Wollheim, P. L. Mulholland, J. R. Webster, J. L. Meyer, J. L. Tank, E. M. Marti, W. B. Bowden, J. M. Valett, A. E. Hershey, W. H. McDowell, W. K. Dodds, S. K. Hamilton, S. Gregory, andD. D. Morall. 2001. Control of nitrogen export from watershed by headwater streams.Science 292:86–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais, N. N. 2002. Nitrogen in aquatic ecosystemsAmbio 31: 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais, N. N., R. E. Turner, D. Justić, Q. Dortch, W. J. Wiseman. Jr., and B. K. Sen Gupta. 1996. Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf,Estuaries 19:386–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais, N. N., R. E. Turner, andD. Scavia. 2002. Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and the Mississippi River.BioScience 52:129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R., R. Elmgren, S. Fleischer, P. Jonsson, G. Persson, andH. Dahlin. 1990. Marine eutrophication case studies in Sweden.Ambio 19:102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryther, J. H. andW. M. Dunstan 1971. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in the coastal marine environment.Science 171:1008–1012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, A. N. 2000. Agriculture and Phosphorus Management: The Chesapeake Bay. Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A., G. E. Schwarz, andR. B. Alexander. 1997. Regional interpretation of water quality monitoring data.Water Resources Research 33:2781–2798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, T. 2001., Oxygen-deficient waters along the Japanese coast and their effects upon the estuarine ecosystem.Journal of Environmental Quality 30:291–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., J. Fargione, B. Wolff, C. D’Antonio, A. Dobson, R. Howarth, D. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger, D. Simberloff, andD. Swackhamer. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change.Science 292:281–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1995. The Great Lakes: An Environmental Atlas and Resource Book. EPA-905-B-95-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2000. Deposition of air pollutants to the Great Waters: Third Report to Congress. EPA-453-R-00-005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., J. D. Aber, R. W. Howarth, G. E. Likens, P. A. Matson, D. W. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger, andD. G. Tilman. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences.Ecological Applications 7:737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaitsev, Y. P. 1999. Eutrophication of the Black Sea and its major consequences, p. 58–74.In L. D. Mee and G. Topping (eds.). Black Sea Pollution Assessment. Black Sea Environmental Series, Volume 10. UN Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, A. R. andE. A. Canuel. 2000. A geochemical record of eutrophication and anoxia in Chesapeake Bay sediments: Anthropogenic influence on organic matter composition.Marine Chemistry 69:117–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sources of Unpublished Materials

  • Galloway, J. N. Personal communication. Department of Environmental Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

  • Walters, C. 1997. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems.Conservation Ecology [online] 1: 1. http://www.consecol.org/voll/iss2/art 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald F. Boesch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boesch, D.F. Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems. Estuaries 25, 886–900 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804914

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804914

Keywords

Navigation