Skip to main content
Log in

Immunoassay for native enzyme quantification in biological samples

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to detect low levels of enzyme activity, specifically glucose oxidase, in biological samples, an immunoenzymatic assay was developed since currently available methods could not be used because of either their lack of sensitivity or the conditions prevailing in our samples: turbidity of the medium, presence of redox systems other than glucose oxidase, and high concentration of proteins.

The principle of the method is to coat a polystyrene surface with a fragment Fc-specific anti-IgG, then with an antibody directed against the looked-for enzyme, which is simultaneously the antigen and the enzyme activity required for immunoenzymatic detection. We applied this concept to biological samples after glucose oxidase administration to mice. This method achieves specificity and sensitivity (20 ng/mL or 1 ng) with samples of biological origin. No marker is needed since the antigen itself possesses an enzyme activity. This method, which requires a small sample volume (50 ΜL, 20 ΜL, if necessary), can be extended easily to the many enzymes currently used as markers. It could also be applied to the native enzymes of medical interest for which antibodies and a colorimetric reaction are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IgG:

immunoglobulin

anti-Fc IgG:

rabbit antimouse fragment Fc-specific IgG

PBS:

phosphate buffered saline

PBS-Tween:

Tween 20 0.1% dissolved in PBS

OPD:

o-phenylenediamine

ABTS:

2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt

References

  1. Brady, R. (1983),Pharmacol. Ther. 19, 327–336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Monsigny, M., Roche, A.-C., and Bailly, P. (1984),Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 121, 579–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Langer, R. (1990),Science 249, 1527–1533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vladimirsky, M. A. and Ladigina, G. A. (1982),Biomedicine 36, 375–377.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. J. M., Lokerse, A. F., Roerdink, F. H., Regts, D., and Michel, M. F. (1985),J. Infect. Dis. 151, 917–924.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aubree-Lecat, A., Hervagault, C., Delacour, A., Beaude, P., Bourdillon, C., and Remy, M.-H. (1989),Anal. Biochem. 178, 427–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Verhaar, A. L. T. and De Wilt, H. G. J. (1969),J. Chromatogr. 41, 168–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fedorov, A. A. and Pavlinova, A. V. (1972),Zh. Anal. Khim. 27, 202–204.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lecoq, D. (1972), Influence de la structure sur le comportement cinétique de systemes multienzymatiques séquentiels. PhD. Thesis, University of Rouen, France.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Bellefontaine, C., Josse, F., Domurado, M. et al. Immunoassay for native enzyme quantification in biological samples. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 48, 117–123 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02796166

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02796166

Index Entries

Navigation