Skip to main content
Log in

Two neutrinos or one?

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

Summary

We discuss the value, in the light of recent «two-neutrino» experiments (1), of giving meaning to the neutrino charge or lepton number independent of helicity;i.e., of giving up the two-component neutrino theory and reverting to a single four-component neutrino whose left- and right-helicity states are coupled to e and μ+, respectively. It is shown that, in fact,only by such experiments, involving muonsand electrons or their neutrinos, can a nontrivial meaning be given to lepton conservation. This Dirac neutrino theory is compared with the conventional theory of two two-component neutrinos from the conceptual and experimental points of view. Some remarks are made about the possibility of explaining the μ—e mass difference.

Riassunto

Alla luce dei recenti esperimenti sui due neutrini (1), si discute l’opportunità, di dar significato alla carica od al numero leptonico del neutrino indipendentemente dall’elicità; cioè, di abbandonare la teoria del neutrino a due componenti e di tornare al neutrino singolo con quattro componenti i cui stati con elicità sinistra e destra sono accoppiati rispettivamente all’e ed al μ+. Si dimostra che, in effetti, solo conquesti esperimenti, che coinvolgono muonied elettroni od i loro neutrini, si può attribuire un significato non banale alla conservazione leptonica. Si paragona questa teoria del neutrino di Dirac con la teoria convenzionale dei due neutrini con due componenti dai punti di vista concettuale e sperimentale. Si fanno alcune osservazioni sulla possibilità di spiegare la differenza di massa μ—e.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Danby, J.-M. Gaillard, K. Goulianos, L. M. Lederman, N. Mistry, M. Schwartz andJ. Steinberger:Phys. Rev. Lett.,9, 36 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. D. Lee andC. N. Yang:Phys. Rev. 105, 1671 (1957);L. Landau:Nucl. Phys.,3, 127 (1957);A. Salam:Nuovo Cimento,5, 299 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bartlett, S. Devons andA. Sachs:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 120 (1962);S. Frankel, J. Halpern, L. Holloway, W. Wales, M. Yearian, O. Chamberlain, A. Lemonick andF. M. Pipkin:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 123 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Pauli:Nuovo Cimento,6, 204 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Davis andD. S. Harmer:Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.,4, 217 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reviewed inH. Primakoff andS. P. Rosen:Rep. Progr. Phys.,23, 121 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Reines, C. L. Cowan jr.,F. B. Harrison, A. D. Maguire andH. W. Kruse:Phys. Rev.,117, 159 (1960).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. E. J. Konopinski:Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci.,9, 99 (1959)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. E. J. Konopinski andH. Mahmoud:Phys. Rev.,92, 1045 (1953).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Schwinger:Ann. Phys. (New York),2, 207 (1957);B. F. Touschek:Nuovo Cimento,5, 754, 1281 (1957);H. Umezawa andA. Visconti:Nucl. Phys.,4, 224 (1957);Y. Katayama:Progr. Theor. Phys.,17, 510 (1957);I. Kawakami:Progr. Theor. Phys.,19, 459 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. O. A. Zaimidoroga, M. M. Kulyurin, B. Pontecorvo, R. M. Sulyaev, A. I. Filippov, V. M. Tsupko-Sitnikov andYu. A. Shcherbakov:Žurn. Ėksp. Teor. Fiz.,41, 1804 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. H. Barkas, W. Birnbaum andF. M. Smith:Phys. Rev.,101, 778 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. A. Bludman:Phys. Rev.,124, 947 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Feinberg, F. Gürsey andA. Pais:Phys. Rev. Lett.,7, 429 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. A. McLennan jr.:Phys. Rev.,106, 821 (1957);K. M. Case:Phys. Rev.,107, 307 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. K. M. Case: loc. cit. ref. (17) ;S. A. Bludman:Phys. Rev.,107, 1163 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Okun, at the1962 International Conference on High-Energy Physics at CERN Geneva, 1962).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission.

This paper was written while the author was a guest of the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif., whose hospitality he gratefully acknowledges.

Traduzione a cura della Redazione.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bludman, S.A. Two neutrinos or one?. Nuovo Cim 27, 751–760 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784579

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784579

Navigation