Skip to main content
Log in

Assisted hatching does not enhance IVF success in good-prognosis patients

  • Clinical Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The role of assisted hatching in good-prognosis IVF patients was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study, which was followed by a retrospective observational series.

Methods: After assisted hatching was proved successful in a mouse embryo study, 20 good-prognosis IVF patients were randomly assigned to either assisted hatching (13) or no assisted hatching (7; the controls). Following this series, 27 good-prognosis IVF patients were retrospectively evaluated to determine the outcome with assisted hatching.

Results: In the prospective study, clinical pregnancies resulted from 3 (23%) of 13 patients in the hatching group, compared to 3 (43%) of 7 in the control group. Implantation rates were similar: 9.6% in the hatching group and 10.7% in the controls. In the retrospective series, the 11.1% implantation rate with assisted hatching was significantly less than the 42.9% implantation rate seen with traditional IVF.

Conclusions: Implantation and pregnancy rates are high in young women undergoing traditional IVF. Assisted hatching is not beneficial in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alikani M, Cohen J, Liccardi FL, Talansky BE: Micromanipulation. In Annual Progress in Reproductive Medicine, 1993, RH Asch, JWW Studd (eds). New York, Parthenon, 1993, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S: Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;49:112–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Veeck LL: Preembryo grading: In Atlas of the Human Oocyte and Early Conceptus. Baltimore, MD, Williams and Wilkins, 1991, Vol 2, pp 121–149

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tucker MJ, Ingargiola PE, Massey JB, Morton PC, Weimer KE, Wilker SR, Wright G: Assisted hatching with or without bovine oviductal epithelial cell co-culture for poor prognosis in vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1528–1531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Presented in part at the 50th Annual Clinical Meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, Seattle, Washington, October 7–12, 1995.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurst, B.S., Tucker, K.E., Awoniyi, C.A. et al. Assisted hatching does not enhance IVF success in good-prognosis patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 15, 62–64 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766826

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766826

KEY WORDS

Navigation