Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variation and repeatability of courtship song characters among wild-caught and laboratory-rearedDrosophila montana andD. littoralis males (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

InDrosophila montana andD. littoralis (species of theD. virilis group), females use male courtship song in their mate choice in wild preferring males which produce short and dense sound pulses (Aspi and Hoikkala, 1995). In the present study these song characters were found to be repeatable among overwintered males. Male progenies of wild-caught flies reared in the laboratory, and inD. montana also the males collected in wild before overwintering, exhibited very little variation between males in these characters. Contrary to pulse characters, pulse train characters measured forD. montana song varied significantly between laboratory-reared males. Our findings suggest that inD. montana andD. littoralis song characters playing a part in sexual selection in the wild are more condition dependent than song characters which are not the direct targets of female choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, M. (1986). Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: Sexual selection based on viability differences.Evolution 40: 804–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspi, J., and Hoikkala, A. (1993). Laboratory and natural heritabilities of male courtship song characters inDrosophila montana andD. littoralis.Heredity 70: 400–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aspi, J., and Hoikkala, A. (1995). Male mating success and survival in the field with respect to size and courtship song characters inDrosophila littoralis andD. montana (Diptera: Drosophilidae).J. Insect Behav. 8: 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. A. (1984).A Manual of Quantitative Genetics, Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boake, R. B. (1989). Repeatability: Its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior.Evolut. Ecol. 3: 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R., and Hewitt, G. M. (1986). Heritability estimates for characters under sexual selection in grasshopper,Chorthippus brunneus.Anim. Behav. 34: 1256–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. C., and Moore, A. (1995). Variation and repeatability of male agonistic his characters and their relationship to social rank inGromphadorhina portentosa.Anim. Behav. 50: 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1981).Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd ed., Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1958).The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd ed., Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, H. C. (1991). Female mate choice in treefrogs: Static and dynamic acoustic criteria.Anim. Behav. 42: 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa, Y., Pomiankovski, A., and See, N. (1991). The evolution of costly mate preference. II. The “handicap principle.”Evolution 45: 1431–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A. C., and Jaenike, J. (1992). Determinants of mating success in wildDrosophila testacea.Anim. Behav. 44: 168–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessells, C. M., and Boag, P. T. (1987). Unrepeatable repeatables: A common mistake.Auk 104: 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumme, J. (1978). Phenology and photoperiodic diapause in northern populations ofDrosophila. In Dingle, H. (ed.),Evolution of Insect Migration and Diapause, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A., and Ricker, J. P. (1992). Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of threeDrosophila species.Heredity 69: 122–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., Hoffman, A. A., and Jones, J. S. (1987). Male size and mating success inDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila pseudoobscura under field conditions.Anim. Behav. 35: 468–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankovski, A., Iwasa, Y., and See, N. (1991). The evolution of costly mate preference. I. Fisher and biased mutation.Evolution 45: 1422–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, J. A., and Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Evening bat isolation calls provide evidence for heritable signatures.Anim. Behav. 46: 847–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. E., and Kekic, V. (1988). Sexual selection in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 42: 197–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1977). The cost of honesty: Further remarks on the handicap principle.J. Theor. Biol. 67: 603–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Oulu, 90571, Oulu, Finland

    Anneli Hoikkala & Eija Isoherranen

Authors
  1. Anneli Hoikkala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eija Isoherranen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoikkala, A., Isoherranen, E. Variation and repeatability of courtship song characters among wild-caught and laboratory-rearedDrosophila montana andD. littoralis males (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Insect Behav 10, 193–202 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765552

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765552

Key Words

Search

Navigation