Skip to main content
Log in

In search of the neurobiological underpinnings of the differential outcomes effect

  • Papers
  • Published:
Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Correlating unique rewards with to-be-remembered events (the Differential Outcomes Procedure [DOP]) enhances learning and memory performance in a range of species. Recently, we have demonstrated that the DOP can be used to reduce or eliminate the learning and memory impairments associated with animal models of amnesia and dementia. This powerful phenomenon, the Differential Outcomes Effect (DOE), has led to the question: How does such a simple manipulation exert such dramatic influence on learning and memory performance? A revised two-process account of the DOE states that using the DOP results in the activation of reward expectancies through Pavlovian mechanisms. The use of unique reward expectancies alters the nature of cognitive processing used to solve discrimination tasks. The change in cognitive processing is represented by utilization of a different memory system than that commonly used to acquire and remenber information when a Nondifferential Outcomes Procedure (NOP) is used. Using neurochemical manipulations, it has been demonstrated that different, potentially independent, brain systems modulate memory performance when subjects are trained with a NOP versus a DOP. This memory-based DOP/NOP distinction resembles other dissociative memory theories in which two psychological processes are purportedly served by distinct neurobiological mechanisms. In addition, such results have important ramifications for the treatment of memory disorders because they demonstrate that stimulus and behavioral manipulations, like drugs, can influence neurotransmitter functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, C.A., Green, J., Baldwin, J., & Johnson, W.E. (1987). Behavioral and neurophysiological examples of functional sparing in senescent rats.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 131–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzetti, R., Kirpan, M., Savage, L.M. (2001). The role of the GABA—A agonist muscimol on memory performance: Cognitive strategy determines the nature of the deficit. North East Under/graduate Research Organization for Neuroscience, Wellesley, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N.J. (1984). Preserved learning capacity in amnesia: evidence for multiple memory systems. In L.R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.),Neuropsychology of memory. (83–103). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N.J. & Squire, L.R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnestics: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that.Science, 210, 207–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B.J., Klewer, M., Jones, G.H., Stephens, D.N. (1993). Contrasting effects of the competitive NMDA antagonist CPP and the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK 801 on performance of an operant delayed matching to position task in rats.Psychopharmacology, 111, 465–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F.M., Morris, L.W., Morris, R.G., & Loewen, E.R. (1990). Relations between source amnesia and frontal lobe functioning in older adults.Psychology of Aging, 5, 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demarse, T.B. & Urcuioli, P.J. (1994). Enhancement of Matching Acquisition by differential comparisonoutcome associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, Animal Behavioral Processess, 19, 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, S. B. (1985). Comparative effects of cholinergic drugs and lesions of nucleus basalis or fimbra-fornix on delayed matching in rats.Psychopharmacology, 87, 357–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, S.B. (1993). Operant delayed matching and non-matching to position in rats. A. Sahgal (ed).Behavioral Neuroscience: A practical Approach. pp. 123–136. IRL Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, S.B., Evenden, J.L., & Iversen, S.D. (1988). Delay-dependent short-term memory deficits in aged rats.Psychopharmacology, 96, 174–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, S.B., Martel, F.L., & Iversen, S.D. (1990). Proactive interference effects on short-term memory in rats: II. Effects in young and aged rats.Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 666–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C.A., Jagielo, J.A., Zentall, T.R., & Hogan, D.E. (1982). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in delayed matching to sample by pigeons: Mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies.Journal of Experimental Psychology, Animal Behavioral Processes, 8, 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorchak, P.M., & Bolles, R.C., (1986). Differential outcomes effects using biological neutral outcomes.Journal of Experimentl Psychology, Animal Behavioral Processes, 12, 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. & Pelleymounter, M.A. (1988). Spatial, learning deficits in old rats: a model for memory decline in the aged.Neurobiology of Aging, 9, 549–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goeters, S., Blakely, E., & Poling, A. (1992). The differential outcomes effect.The Psychological Record, 42, 389–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochhalter, A.K., Sweeney, W.A., Savage, L.M., Bakke, B.L., & Overmier, J.B. (2001). Learning new faces and places: Addressing memory difficulties in Wernicke—Korsakoff patients through animal models. In Carroll, M.E., & Overmier, J.B. (Eds).Linking animal research to human psychological health. Washington, DC, APA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, W.K., Matheson, W.R., & Dodd, P.W. (1984). Outcome expectancies as mediators for discriminative responding.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 196–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, R.R., & Lishman, W.A. (1987). Selective memory, loss and global intellectual deficits in alcoholic Korsakoff's syndrome.Psychological Medicine, 17, 649–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, R.P., & Williams, J.M., (1995). Memory for magnitude of reinforcement: dissociation between the amygdala and hippocampus.Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 64, 237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby, D.L., Jones, D.N., & Higgins, G.A. (1995). Influence of prefeeding and scopolamine upon performan in a delayed matching-to-position task.Behavioural Brain Research, 67, 221–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J.M., Overmier, J.B., Konz, W.A., & Ronke, E. (1983). Pavlovian CS effects upon instrumental choice behavior are reinforcer specific.Learning and Motivation, 14, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlais, P.J. (1992). Role of diencephalic lesions and thiamine deficiency in Korsakoff's amnesia: Insights from animal models. In L.R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.),Neuropsychology of Memory (pp. 440–450). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlais, P.J., & Mair, R.G. (1990). Protective effects of the glutamate antagonist MK-801 on pyrithiamine-induced lesions and amino acid changes in rat brain.Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 1664–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langlais, P.J., & Savage, L.M. (1995). Thiamine deficiency in rats produces cognitive and memory deficits on spatial tasks which correlate with tissue loss in diencephalon, cortex and white matter.Behavioral Brain Research, 68, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlais, P.J., & Zhang, S.X. (1993). Extracellular, glutamate is increased in the thalamus during thiamine deficiency-induced lesions and is blocked by MK-801.Journal of Neurochemistry, 61, 2175–2182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langlais, P.J., Zhang, S.X., & Savage, L.M. (1996). Neuropathology of thiamine deficiency: An update on the comparative analysis of human disorders and experimental models.Metabolic Brain Disease, 11, 19–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linwick, D., Overmier, J. B., Peterson, G. B., & Mertens, M. (1988). The interactions of memories and expectancies as mediators of choice behavior.American Journal of, Psychology, 101, 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, R.G. (1994). On the role of thalamic pathology in diencephalic amnesia.Reviews in Neuroscience, 5, 105–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, R.G., Anderson, C.D., Langlais, P.J. & McEntee, W.J. (1985). Thiamine deficiency depletes cortical norepinephrine and impairs learning processes in the rat.Brain Research, 360, 273–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, R.G., Knoth, R.L., Rabchenuk, S.A., & Langlais, P.J. (1991a). Impairment of olfactory, auditory, and spatial serial reversal learning in rats recovered from pyrithiamine-induced thiamine deficiency.Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 360–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, R.G., Otto, T.A., Knoth, R.L., Rabchenuk, S.A., & Langlais, P.J. (1991b). An analysis of aversively conditioned learning and memory in rats recovered from pyrithiamine-liduced thiamine deficiency.Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 351–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M.P., Wenk, G.L., & Crawley, J.N. (1997). Analysis of galanin and the galanin antagonist M40 on delayed non-matching-to-position performance in rats lesioned with the cholinergic immunotoxin 192 IgG-saporin.Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 552–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R.J. & White, N.M. (1993). A triple dissociation of memory systems: hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum.Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 3–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch, M, & Winocur, G, (1995). Frontal lobes, memory, and agingAnnuals of the New York Academy of Science, 769, 119–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olton, D.S. (1984). Comparative analysis of episodic memory.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 250–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overmier, J.B., Savage, L.M. & Sweeney, W.A. (2000). Behavioral and Pharmacological, Analysis of Memory Offer New Options for Remediation. pp. 231–246. In M. Haug & R. Whalen (Eds.).Animal Models of Human Emotion and Cognition. APA publications: Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, M.G., & McGaugh, J.L. (1996). Inactivation of hippocampaus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially, affects expression of place and response learning.Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 65, 65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, O.A., & Nixon, S.J. (1993). Neurobehavioral sequelae of alcoholism.Neurologic Clinics 11, 205–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G.B. (1984). The differential outcomes procedure: A paradigm for studying how expectancies guide behavior. In H.L., Roitblat, T.G. Bever, & H.S. Terrace (eds).Animal Cognition, pp. 135–148. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G.B., & Traplod, M.A. (1980). Effects of altering outsome expectancies on pigeons' delayed conditional discrimination performance.Learning and Motivation, 11, 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G.B., Linwick, D., & Overmier, J.B. (1987). On the comparative efficacy of memories and expectancies as cues for choice behavior in pigeons.Learning and Motivation, 18, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo, M.J., Clissold, D.B. White, M.F., Ferkany, J.W. (1991). N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists and working memory performance: Comparison with the effects of scopolamine, propranolol, diazepam, and phenyliso-propyladenosine.Behavioral Neuroscience 105, 521–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, W.E., & Mizumori, S.J.Y. (1998). Characteristics of basolateral amygdala neuronal firing on a spatial memory task involving differential reward. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 554–570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G.S., Crooks, G.B. Shinkman, P.G., Gallagher, M. (1989). Behavioral effects of MK-801 mimics deficits associated with hippocampal damage.Psychobiology, 17, 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.K., & Mair, R.G. (1992). MK-801 prevents brain lesions and delayed-nonmatching-to-sample deficits produced by pyrithiamine-induced encephalopathy in rats.Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 623–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.K., & Crawley, J.N. (1993). Intraseptal galanin potentiates scopolamine impairment of delayed nonmatching to sample.Journal of Neuroscience 13, 5119–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.M. & Langlais, P.J. (1995). Differential Outcomes Attenuates Spatial Memory Impairments Seen in Pyrithiamine-induced Thiamine Deficient Rats.Psychobiology, 23, 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.M., & Parsons, J.P. (1997). The Effects of Delay-Interval, Inter-trial-Interval, Amnestic Drugs, and Differential Outcomes on Matching-to-Position in Rats.Psychobiology.

  • Savage, L.M., Pitkin, S., & Knitowski, K. (1999). Rats exposed to pyrithiamine-induced thiamine deficiency are more sensitive to the amnestic effects of scopolamine and MK-801: Examination of working memory, response selection, and reinforcement continegencies.Behavioural Brain Research, 104, 13–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.M., Pitkin, S., & Careri, J. (1999). Memory enhancement in aged-rats: The differential outcomes effect.Developmental Psychobiology, 35, 318–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D.L. (1985). Multiple forms of memory in humans and animals In N. Weinberger, G. Lynch, 7 J. McGaugh (Eds.),Memory systems of the brain. Animals and human cognitive processes. (351–379). New York Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D.L. (1994) Priming and multiple memory systems: perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. In D.L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.)Memory Systems 1994. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Pp 233–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherburne, L.M. & Zentall, T.R. (1998). Superior Differential-Outcomes Performance in Pigeons is Obtained by Eliminating Differential Response-Outcome Associations.Animal Learning & Behavior.26, 378–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steckler, T., Keith, A.B., Wiley, R.G., & Sahgal, A. (1995). Cholinergic lesions by 192 IgG-saporin and shortterm, recognition memory: Role of the septohippocampal projection.Neuroscience, 66, 101–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L.R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: a synsthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L.R. & Zola-Morgan, S. (1988). Memory: Brain systems and behavior.Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 170–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trapold, M.A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon, different positive reinforcing events discriminably different?Learning and Motivation, 1,129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trapold, M.A. & Overmier, J.B. (1972) The second learning process in instrumental learning. In A.H. Black and W.F. Prokasy (Ed.)Classical Conditioning II: Current Theory and Research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crafts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P.J. (1990). Differential outcomes and many-to-one matching: Effects of correlation with correct choice.Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 410–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P.J., & DeMarse, T. (1996). Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior.22, 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P.J., & Zentall, T.R. (1990). On the role of trial outcomes in delayed discriminations.Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiskrantz, L (1987). Neuroanatomy of memory and amnesia: a case for multiple memory systems.Human Neurobiology, 6, 93–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa M. Savage Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savage, L.M. In search of the neurobiological underpinnings of the differential outcomes effect. Integr. psych. behav. 36, 182–195 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734092

Keywords

Navigation