Skip to main content
Log in

Short- and long-term effects of environmental urea on fecundity inDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that exposure to urea-supplemented food inhibited fecundity inDrosophila females, and that this inhibition was not expressed when females were given a choice between regular and urea-supplemented food as an oviposition substrate. We assayed fecundity, on both regular food and urea-supplemented food, at 5, 15 and 25 days post eclosion on females from ten laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. The females assayed came from one of two treatments; they were maintained as adults on either regular or urea-supplemented food. We found that exposure to urea-supplemented food inhibited fecundity, relative to the levels exhibited on regular food, regardless of whether the urea was present in the assay medium, or in the medium on which the flies were maintained over the course of the experiment, thereby suggesting that urea has both a long-term (possibly physiological) as well as a short-term (possibly behavioural) inhibitory effect on fecundity ofDrosophila females. We also tested and ruled out the hypothesis that prior yeasting could ameliorate the inhibitory effect of urea in the assay medium on fecundity, as this was a possible explanation of why flies given a choice between regular and urea-supplemented food did not exhibit a preference for regular food in a previous study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken R B and Gibo D L 1979 Changes in fecundity ofDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans in response to selection for competitive ability;Oecologia 43 63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botella L M, Moya A, Gonzales A C and Mensua J L 1985 Larval stop, delayed development and survival in overcrowded cultures ofDrosophila melanogaster: effect of urea and uric acid;J. Insect Physiol. 31 179–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borash D J, Gibbs A G, Joshi A and L D Mueller 1998 A genetic polymorphism maintained by natural selection in a temporally varying environment;Am. Nat. 151 148–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Budnik M and Brncic D 1976 Effects of larval biotic residues on viability in four species ofDrosophila;Evolution 29 777–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang H C and Hodson A C 1950 An analytical study of population growth inDrosophila melanogaster, Ecol. Monogr. 20 173–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Solar E and Palomino H 1966 Choice of oviposition inDrosophila melanogaster;Am. Nat. 100 127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A1997 Laboratory studies of density-dependent selection: adaptations to crowding inDrosophila melanogaster;Curr. Sci. 72 555–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Knight C D and Mueller L D 1996a Genetics of larval urea tolerance inDrosophila melanogaster, Heredity 77 33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Shiotsugu J and Mueller L D 1996b Phenotypic enhancement of longevity by environmental urea inDrosophila melanogaster;Exp. Gerontol. 31 533–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Oshiro W A, Shiotsugu J and Mueller L D 1997 Within- and among-population variation in oviposition preference for urea-supplemented food inDrosophila melanogaster;J. Biosci. 22 325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L D 1988 Density-dependent population growth and natural selection in food-limited environments: theDrosophila model;Am. Nat. 132 786–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L D 1995 Adaptation and density-dependent natural selection; inGenetics of natural populations: the continuing importance’ of Tlzeodosius Dobzizansky (ed.) L Levine (New York: Columbia University Press) pp 101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L D, Gonzalez-Candelas F and Sweet V F 1991 Components of density-dependent population dynamics: models and tests withDrosophila;Am. Nat. 137 457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M R, Nusbaum T J and Chippindale A K 1996 Laboratory evolution: the experimental wonderland and the Cheshire Cat syndrome; inAdaptation (eds) M R Rose and G V Lauder (San Diego: Academic Press) pp 221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheeba V, Madhyastha N A A and Joshi A 1998 Oviposition preference for novel versus normal food resources in laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaster;J. Biosci. 23 93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiotsugu J, Leroi A M, Yashiro H, Rose M R and Mueller L D 1997 The symmetry of correlated responses in adaptive evolution: an experimental study usingDrosophila;Evolution 51 163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amitabh Joshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, A., Oshiro, W.A., Shiotsugu, J. et al. Short- and long-term effects of environmental urea on fecundity inDrosophila melanogaster . J. Biosci. 23, 279–283 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02720030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02720030

Keywords

Navigation