Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans in response to selection for competitive ability

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Equal numbers of the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans were allowed to compete in population cages. Two sets of 5 cages each-A & B-took 20 and 26 weeks respectively until D. simulans comprised less than 15% of the population for 2 successive generations.

  2. 2.

    At the beginning of each cage set, the fecundity of stock females of each species in the presence of con-& heterospecific females, con- and heterospecific larvae, distilled water and a water soluble extract from larvainfested media were determined. Fecundities of daughters of the last generation to be in competition were tested under the same conditions.

  3. 3.

    In all conditions, D. melanogaster stock females had a higher fecundity than D. simulans females at the beginning of each cage set. After competition, the fecundity of both species changes (generally increased) although that of D. simulans increased to a greater degree.

  4. 4.

    In test of the water-soluble extract of previously used media, females of both species showed decreased fecundity. This indicates that females can determine whether a food source has been used by larvae even when no larvae are immediately observable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolph, E.E.: Egg laying reactions in the Pomace fly, Drosophila. J. exp. Zool. 31, 327–341 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpatov, W.W.: Egg production in Drosophila melanogaster and some factors which influence it. J. exp. Zool. 63, 85–111 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrewartha, H.G., Birch, L.C.: The distribution and abundance of animals. Chicago Univ. Chicago Press (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F.: Reversal of dominance in competing species of Drosophila. Amer. Nat. 100, 81–83 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F.: Evolution of fitness. IV. Genetic evolution of interspecific competitive ability in Drosophila. Genetics 61, 737–747 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, LC: The genetic factor in population ecology. Amer. Nat. 90, 5–24 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, E.H., Turner, C.R.: 1972. Rapid evolution of competitive ability in larval mixtures of the housefly. Evolution 26, 161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Budnick, M., Brncic, D.: Effect of larval biotic residues on viability in four species of Drosophila. Evolution 29, 777–780 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapco, W.: The inheritance of fertility in Drosophila melanogaster. PhD. Thesis. University of Toronto. 81 pp (1967)

  • Chiang, H.C., Hodson, A.C.: An analytical study of population growth in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecol. Monogr. 20, 173–206 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, D.: Population processes in the vole and their relevance to general theory. Can. J. Zool. 38, 99–113 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawood, M.M., Strickberger, M.W.: The effect of larval interaction on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Effects of biotic residues. Genetics 63, 213–220 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P.S., Lerner, I.M.: Genetic variation and indeterminisms in interspecific competition. Amer. Nat. 96, 379–380 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: Fecundity of Drosophila pseudoobscura at different temperatures. J. exp. Zool. 71, 449–464 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, E.H., Pimentel, D.: Evolution of increased “female sex ratio” in the blowfly (Phoenicia sericata) under laboratory competition with the housefly (Musca domestica). Amer. Nat. 100, 235–244 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, H.D., Ford, E.B.: Fluctuation in numbers and its influence on variation in Melitaea aurinia Rott. (Lepidoptera) Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 78, 345–351 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J.: Variation in genetic response to interspecific competition in laboratory populations of Drosophila. Amer. Nat. 104, 239–252 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause, G.F.: The struggle for existence. Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibo, D.L.: Interspecific competition at low population densities. Ph.D Thesis. Riverside, California Univ. of California (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibo, D.L.: A stabilizing interaction between the founder effect and interdeme mixing in competing population of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Can. J. Zool. 50, 325–331 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyenot, E.: Études biologiques sur une mouche Drosophila ampelophila Löw. V. Nutrition des adultes et fécondité. C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris 74, 332–334 (1913)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S.: The relation between density regulation and natural selection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. (B) 145, 306–308 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, F.B., Ferris, F.R.: A quantitative study of fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. J. exp. Zool. 54, 485–506 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P.H.: Factors responsible for a change in competitive ability in Drosophila. Evolution 26, 513–522 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliss, N., Graubard, M.A.: The effect of temperature on oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Bull. 70, 385–391 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinross, J., Robertson, A.: Egg laying and survival rates in population cages of Drosophila melanogaster. Dros. Inf. Serv 45, 83 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I.M., Ho, F.K.: Genotype and competitive ability in Tribolium. Amer. Nat. 95, 329–343 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D.R.: Genetic ability and competitive performance in species of Drosophila. Genetics 61 (suppl. 2), 36–37 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A.J.: The growth of mixed populations: two species competing for a common food supply. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 22, 461–469 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickey, G.W., Carpenter, J., Crimley, R.W., Burdotte, W.: Experiments on culture media in regard to oviposition and mass production of Drosophila melanogaster. J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 49, 77–84 (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.S.: Larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Ecology 45, 132–148 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.M.: Competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. II. The improvement of competitive ability through selection. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 38, 813–817 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moree, R.: Data on relative fecundity involving the mutant “ebony” of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 47, 972 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moth, J.J., Barker, J.S.F.: Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Oecologica (Berl.) 23, 151–164 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T.: Studies in population physiology. VI. The effect of differentially conditioned flour upon the fecundity and fertility of Tribolium confusum Duval. J. exp. Zool. 73, 393–604 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T.: Experimental studies of insect populations. Amer. Nat. 71, 21–33 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T., Gregg, E.V., Lutherman, C.Z.: Studies in population physiology. X. Interspecific competition in population of granary beetles. Physiol. Zool. 14, 395–430 (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T., Leslie, P.H., Mertz, D.B.: Genetic strains and competition in populations of Tribolium. Physiol. Zool. 37, 97–162 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P.A.: The comparative evolutionary biology of the sibling species, Drosophia melanogaster and D. simulans. Quart. Rev. Biol. 50, 151–169 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, R.: The influence of density of population upon the egg production in D. melanogaster. J. exp. Zool. 63, 57–84 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D.: Population ecology and the genetic feedback mechanism. Proc. XI Int. Congr. Gen. 483–488 (1961)

  • Pimentel, D., Feinberg, E.H., Wood, P.W., Haynes, J.T.: Selection, spatial distribution and the coexistence of competing fly species. Amer. Nat. 99, 97–109 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F.W., Sang, J.H.: The ecological determinants of population growth in a Drosophila culture. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond (B) 132, 258–291 (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang, J.H.: The ecological determinants of population growth in a Drosophila culture. III. Larval and pupal survival Physiol. Zoo. 22, 183–202 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.: Biometry. W. Freeman and Co. San Francisco (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullyett, G.C.: Competition for food and allied phenomena in sheep-blowfly populations. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. (B) 234, 77–174 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Veillet, A. 1936. Influence de l'acide acetique sur la ponte de la Drosophila (Drosophila melanogaster Meig.). Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 61, 39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D.C.: Inheritance of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 9, 41–69 (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, W.: Individual differences as a factor in population dybamics: the development of the problem. Can. J. Zool. 35, 293–323 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, C.P.: Controlling factors in Drosophila population growth. Quart. Rev. Biol. 12, 348–351 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Erindale College, University of Toronto, L5L 1C6, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

    Ronald B. Aiken & David L. Gibo

Authors
  1. Ronald B. Aiken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David L. Gibo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiken, R.B., Gibo, D.L. Changes in fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans in response to selection for competitive ability. Oecologia 43, 63–77 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346673

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346673

Keywords

Search

Navigation