Skip to main content
Log in

Active region magnetic fields

  • Published:
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tilt angles of sunspot groups are defined, using the Mount Wilson data set. It is shown that groups with tilt angles greater than or less than the average value (≈ 5 deg) show different latitude dependences. This effect is also seen in synoptic magnetic field data defining plages. The fraction of the total sunspot group area that is found in the leading spots is discussed as a parameter that can be useful in studying the dynamics of sunspot groups. This parameter is larger for low tilt angles, and small for extreme tilt angles in either direction. The daily variations of sunspot group tilt angles are discussed. The result that sunspot tilt angles tend to rotate toward the average value is reviewed. It is suggested that at some depth, perhaps 50 Mm, there is a flow relative to the surface that results from a rotation rate faster than the surface rate by about 60 m/sec and a meridional drift that is slower than the surface rate by about 5 m/sec. This results in a slanted relative flow at that depth that is in the direction of the average tilt angle and may be responsible for the tendency for sunspot groups (and plages) to rotate their magnetic axes in the direction of the average tilt angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu, S., Antia, H. M., Tripathy, S. C. 1999,Astrophys. J.,512, 458–470.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. G. 2000,Solar Phys.,191, 47–70.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca, E. E., Gilman, P. A. 1986,Geophys. Astrophy. Fluid Dynamics.,37, 85–127.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D’ Silva, S., Howard, R. F. 1993,Solar Phys.,159, 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Fisher, G. H., DeLuca, E. E. 1993,Astrophys. J.;405, 390–401.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, P. M., Duvall, Jr., T. L., Scherrer, P. H., Bogart, R. S. 1997,Nature,390, 53–54.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, G. E., Ellennan, F., Nicholson, S. B., Joy, A. H. 1919,Astrophys. J.,49, 153–178.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F. 1989,Solar Phys.,123, 271–284.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F. 1996,Solar Phys.,167, 95–113.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F., Gilman, P. A., Gilman, P. I. 1984,Astrophys. J.,283, 373–384.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. F., Sivaraman, K. R., Gupta, S. S. 2000,Solar Physics (submitted).

  • Parker, E. N. 1955,Astrophys. J.,121, 491–507.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R. 1980, in ‘CoolStars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, ’ Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Report No. 389, (ed.) A. K. Dupree, pp 79–96.

  • Schmidt, H. U. 1968, in ‘Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions, ’ IAU Symposium No. 35, (ed.) K. O. Kiepenheuer, (Reidel: Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N. R., Jr. 1989,Solar Phys.,124, 81–100.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, R.F. Active region magnetic fields. J Astrophys Astron 21, 119–125 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02702376

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02702376

Key words

Navigation