Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Democracy, Law, and Comparative Politics

  • Articles
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article offers a revision of democratic theory in light of the experience of recently democratized countries, located outside of the northwestern quadrant of the world. First, various definitions of democracy that claim to follow Schumpeter and are usually considered to be “minimalist” or “processualist” are critically examined. Building upon but clarifying these conceptual efforts, a realistic and restricted, but not minimalist, definition of a democratic regime is proposed. Thereafter, this article argues that democracy should be analyzed not only at the level of the political regime but also in relation to the state—especially the state qua legal system—and to certain aspects of the overall social context. The main underlying theme that runs through this article is the concept of agency, especially as it is expressed in the legal system of existing democracies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchourrón, Carlos and Eugenio Bulygin. 1971.Normative Systems. New York-Vienna: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altimir, Oscar. 1998. “Inequality, Employment, and Poverty in Latin America. An Overview” Pp. 3–35 inPoverty and Inequality in Latin America: Issues and New Challenges, eds. Víctor Tokman and Guillermo O'Donnell. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin. 1984.Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, David. 1993. “Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Democratization”. Pp. 56–87 inProspects for Democracy: North, South, West, and East, ed. David Held. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensel, Richard E. 1990.Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1877. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla ed. 1996. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy”.Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, David and Steven Levitsky. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research”.World Politics 49, 3: 430–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copi, Irving and Carl Cohen. 1998.Introduction to Logic. Upper Saddle River:, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1989.Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Matta, Roberto. 1987. “The Quest for Citizenship in a Relational Universe”. Pp. 307–335 inState and Society in Brazil. Continuity and Change, eds. John Wirth et al. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Partha. 1993.An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 1999.Developing democracy. Toward consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry, Juan J. Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset. 1990. “Introduction: Comparing Experiences with Democracy.” Pp. 1–38 inPolitics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy, eds. Larry Diamond, Juan J. Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990.To Craft Democracies. An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elklit, Jorgen and Palle Svenson. 1997. “What Makes Elections Free and Fair?”Journal of Democracy 8, 3 (July): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fábre, Cécile. 1998. “Constitutionalising Social Rights.”The Journal of Political Philosophy 6, 3: 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994a. “The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship”.World Politics 46, 2: 151–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Jonathan. 1994b. “Latin America's Emerging Local Politics.”Journal of Democracy 5, 2: 05–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Lon L. 1964.The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1987.Reconstruir la política. Transición y consolidación democrática en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Andante.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989.The Chilean Political Process. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, Alan. 1978.Reason and Morality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Robert J. 1983.Political Repression in 19th Century Europe. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Stephen M. 1996.American Constitutionalism. From Theory to Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1986. “Law as a Medium and as Institution”. Pp. 204–20 inDilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, ed. Gunther Teubner. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988.The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: Utah University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996.Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. H. 1991.The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A. 1961.The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Kim Quaile. 1994.Democracy in the Fifty States. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. 1991.The Rhetoric of Reaction Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Stephen and Cass R. Sunstein. 1999.The Cost of Rights: Why Liberty Depends on Taxes. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 1991.The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, Peter. 1985. “Maintaining the Rule of Law”.The Philosophical Quarterly 35, 141: 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, Hans. 1945.General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russell and Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V.O. 1949.Southern Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingeman, Hans-Dieter and Richard Hofferbert. 1998. “Remembering the Bad Old Days: Human Rights, Economic Conditions and Democratic Performance in Transitional Regimes”. Discussion Paper FS III 98-203. Berlin: Wissenschaftzentrum Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. 1998. “Democracy's Time Constraints”International Political Science Review 19, 1 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan and Alfred Stepan. 1996.Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas, 1998. “Quod Omnes Tangit: Remarks on Jurgen Habermas' Legal Theory”. Pp. 157–172 inHabermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchange, eds. M. Rosenfeld and Andrew Arato. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott. 1999.Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, Juan, Guillermo O'Donnell, and Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro eds. 1999.The Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves, Marcelo. 1994. “Entre subintegração e sobreintegração: A Cidadania inexistente”Dados 37, 2: 253–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973.Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism. Berkeley: Institute for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988.Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Argentina 1966–1973 in Comparative Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries”.World Development 21, 8: 1355–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996a. “Illusions about Consolidation”.Journal of Democracy 7, 2 (April): 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996b. “Illusions, and Conceptual Flaws”.Journal of Democracy 7, 4: 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. “Poverty and Inequality in Latin America: Some Political Reflections”. Pp. 49–71 inPoverty and Inequality in Latin America: Issues and New Challenges, eds. Víctor Tokman and Guillermo O'Donnell. Notre Dame:, Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999a. “Horizontal Accountability and New Polyarchies”. Pp. 29–52 inThe Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, eds. Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Mark Plattner. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999b. “Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America.” Pp. 303–337 inThe Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, eds. Juan Méndez Guillermo O'Donnell, and Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, Guillermo. Forthcoming. “Horizontal Accountability: The Legal Institutionalization of Political Mistrust”. InAccountability, Democratic Governance, and Political Institutions in Latin America, eds. Scott Mainwaring and Christopher Welna.

  • O'Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986.Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus. 1991. “Capitalism by Democratic Design? Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe”.Social Research 58, 4: 865–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro, Manuel Castells, and Lauren Benton eds. 1989.The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro and Richard Schauffler. 1993. “The Informal Economy in Latin America”. Pp. 3–40 inWork Without Protections: Case Studies of the Informal Sector in Developing Countries. Bureau of International Labor Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro. 1994. “When More Can Be Less: Labor Standards, Development, and the Informal Economy”. Pp. 113–129 inContrapunto: The Informal Sector Debate in Latin America, ed. Cathy Rakowsky. Albany: New York State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, Ulrich. 1996. “The Political Meaning of Constitutionalism”. Pp. 11–27 inConstitutionalism, Democracy, and Sovereignty: American and European Perspectives, ed. Richard Bellamy. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prezworski, Adam. 1991.Democracy and the Market. Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prezworski, Adam. 1998. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” Symposium on Rethinking Democracy for a New Century, Yale University.

  • Przeworski, Adam, Michael Alvarez, José A. Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 1996. “What Makes Democracies Endure?”Journal of Democracy 7, 1: 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakowski, Cathy ed. 1994Contrapunto: The Informal Sector in Latin America. Albany: New York State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1997. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”.The University of Chicago Law Review 64, 3: 765–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz, Joseph. 1986.The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994.Ethics in the Public Domain. Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William. 1982.Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1992.Le sacre du citoyen: Histoire du suffrage universel en France. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, David and Richard Snyder. 2001. “The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective”.British Journal of Political Science vol. 31.

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1987.The Theory of Democracy Revisited. I. The Contemporary Debate: The Theory of Democracy Revisited. II. The Classical Issues. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1995. “How Far Can Free Govemment Travel?”Journal of Democracy 6, 3: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, Frederic. 1998.Democracy in Translation. Understanding Politics in an Unfamiliar Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe. 1994. “Dangers and Dilemmas of Democracy”,Journal of Democracy 5, 2: 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph. 1975 [1942].Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1992.Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. “Capability and Well-Being”. Pp. 30–53 inThe Quality of Life, eds. Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Ian. 1996.Democracy's Place. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, Judith N. 1989. “The Liberalism of Fear.” Pp. 21–38 inLiberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Nancy L. Rosenblum Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin. 1984. “The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives”. Pp. 193–211 inPhilosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy eds. Richard Rorty et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1993. “What's Wrong with Negative Liberty”. InThe Idea of Freedom, ed. Alan Ryan. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, Rosemary. 1998.Progress, Poverty and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the Twentieth Century. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokman, Víctor. 1992.Beyond, Regulation. The Informal Economy in Latin America. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. “Informalidad y pobreza Progreso social y modernización productiva”.El Trimestre económico 61: 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J. Samuel. 1992. “Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings: Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions”. Pp. 57–104 inIssues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, eds. Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O'Donnell, and J. Samuel Vaenzuela. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veja. 1997. “Medo do sertão”. (September 10): 70–72.

  • Weber, Max. 1968.Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. 2 vols Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry. 1997 “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law”.American Political Science Review 91, 2: 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, Christian and Ronald Inglehart. 1999. “Analyzing Democratic Change and Stability: A Human Development Theory of Democracy”. Wissenschaftzentrum Berlin and University of Michigan.

Download references

Authors
  1. Guillermo A. O’Donnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I dedicate this article to my daughter Julia, for the metonymy and much love

Guillermo O'Donnell is the Helen Kellogg Professor of Government at the University of Notre Dame. He has written many books and articles on authoritarianism, political transitions, democratization, and democratic theory. His latest book,Counterpoints, was published in 1998 by the University of Notre Dame Press. O'Donnell is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

I presented previous versions of this paper and received useful comments at seminars held in April and May 1999 at the University of North Carolina; Cornell University; Berlin's Wissenschaftszentrum; the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, August 1999; and in September 1999 at the Kellogg Institute. I also appreciate the comments and criticisms received from Michael Brie, Maxwell Cameron, Jorgen Elklit, Robert Fishman, Ernesto Garzón Valdés, Jonathan Hartlyn, Osvaldo Iazzetta, Gabriela Ippolito-O'Donnell, Iván Jaksić, Oscar Landi, Hans-Joachim Lauth, Steven Levitsky, Juan Linz, Scott Mainwaring, Juan M. Abal Medina, Martha Merritt, Peter Moody, Gerardo Munck, Luis Pásara, Timothy Power, Adam Przeworski, Héctor Schamis, Sidney Tarrow. Charles Tilly, Ashutosh Varshney, and Ruth Zimmerling. I am particularly grateful for the careful revision and editing undertaken by Gerardo Munck and Ruth Collier for the present issue ofSCID.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Donnell, G.A. Democracy, Law, and Comparative Politics. St Comp Int Dev 36, 7–36 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687583

Keywords

Search

Navigation