Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of strike voting behavior: The case of university faculty

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the impact of demographic characteristics, job variables, and attitudinal factors on the strike voting behavior of faculty members at a Canadian university. The results show that married faculty members and those from single-income households were more inclined to vote against the strike. Regarding the attitudinal factors, faculty members who were satisfied with existing research facilities and were loyal to the Faculty Association were likely to favor the strike, whereas faculty who were satisfied with working conditions and with the university administration were opposed to the strike. Beliefs about unions, however, did not appear to have an influence on voting behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alutto, Joseph A. and James A. Belasco. “Determinants of Attitudinal Militancy Among Nurses and Teachers.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 27 (January 1974): 216–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aussieker, Bill. “The Incidence and Impact of Faculty Union Strikes.”Labor Law Journal 26 (December 1977): 776–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begin, James P. “Grievance Mechanisms and Faculty Collegiality: The Rutgers Case.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 31 (April 1978): 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B. “Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly 19 (December 1974): 533–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, Shimon. “Determinants of Officers’ Militancy: The Case of the National Union of Teachers in Israel.”Relations Industrielles 34 (Spring 1979): 287–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnenwerth, G.V. and H.G. Cox. “Attitudinal Militancy Among Teachers.”Sociological Quarterly 19 (Summer 1978): 459–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, Todd. “Bargaining and the Determinants of Teacher Salaries.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 41 (January 1988): 263–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisele, Fred C. “Plant Size and Frequency of Strikes.”Labor Law Journal 21 (December 1970): 779–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito, Jack. “Political Instrumentality Perceptions and Desires for Union Representation.”Journal of Labor Research 8 (Summer 1987): 271–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florkowski, Gary and Michael Schuster. “Predicting the Decisions to Vote and Support Unions in Certification Elections: An Integrated Perspective.”Journal of Labor Research 8 (Spring 1987): 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, William S. and Michael H. Wince. “The Structure and Determinants of Occupational Militancy Among Public School Teachers.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 30 (October 1976): 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Michael E., John W. Philpot, Robert E. Burt, Cynthia A. Thompson, and William E. Spiller. “Commitment to the Union: Development of a Measure and an Examination of Its Correlates.”Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph 65 (August 1980): 479–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, Charles R. and Patricia M. Brown. “Teacher’s Attitudes Towards Unions, Working Conditions, and Strikes Following an Illegal Strike in the Southwest.”Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 11 (Summer 1982): 243–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huszczo, Gregory E. “Attitudinal and Behavioral Variables Related to Participation in Union Activities.”Journal of Labor Research 4 (Summer 1983): 289–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juravich, Tom and Peter R. Shergold. “The Impact of Unions on the Voting Behavior of their Members.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 41 (April 1988): 374–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Louarn, Jean-Yves. “Les professeurs d’universite et leur travail.”Relations Industrielles 37 (Summer 1982): 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, Dennis and Kenneth Strand. “The Determinants of Strike Activity.”Relations Industrielles 39 (Winter 1984): 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, James E. “Employee Characteristics and Representation Election Outcomes.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38 (April 1985): 365–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Robert A. “Interindustry Differences in Strike Activity.”Industrial Relations 18 (Winter 1979): 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, Steven L. “Sources of Attitudinal Union Militancy.”Relations Industrielles 40 (Springer 1985): 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, Robert S. and Daniel L. Rubinfeld.Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponak, Allen M. and Mark Thompson. “Faculty Attitudes and the Scope of Bargaining.”Industrial Relations 18 (Winter 1979): 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, Melvin W. and George R. Neumann. “Conflict and Contract: The Case of Strikes.”Journal of Political Economy 88 (October 1980): 867–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutt, Russell K. “Models of Militancy: Support for Strikes and Work Actions among Public Employees.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 35 (April 1982): 406–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, Donald P. and Lee Dyer. “Correlates of Faculty Salary Levels.”Industrial Relations 18 (Spring 1979): 210–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirom, A. “Union Militancy: Structural and Personal Determinants.”Industrial Relations 16 (Winter 1977): 152–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, John. “An Inter-Industry Analysis of Strike Frequency.”Economica 43 (November 1976): 349–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. Malcolm and John J. Lawler. “Union Campaign Activities and Voter Preferences.”Journal of Labor Research 7 (Winter 1986): 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webel, J.D. and S. Gould. “A Comparison of the Relationship of Commitment to Turnover in Recent Hires and Tenured Employees.”Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (November 1984): 687–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Hoyt N.Industrial Conflict: An Integrative Theory. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author thanks J. Dart, A. Dastmalchian, R. Long, D. Maki, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, I. Predictors of strike voting behavior: The case of university faculty. Journal of Labor Research 12, 123–134 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685377

Keywords

Navigation