Skip to main content
Log in

Union campaign activities and voter preferences

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of campaign activity on voting preferences in union representation elections is investigated using a panel study approach. The context of this study is a four-year, multicampus, university system, in which two faculty unions competed vigorously for representation rights for several years. We propose a multivariate model of individual voting intentions which, we argue, depend on the precampaign expected consequences of collective bargaining, recent changes in institutional conditions, various normative and value constraints, and union campaign activity. Both self-reports of exposure to campaign activity and exogenous measures of campus-specific organizing efforts are used in the analysis. The use of exogenous indicators of campaign activity, which we argue is more appropriate, suggests that campaign activity exerts no appreciable effect on the manner in which individuals vote in such elections. Policy implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, Takeshi. “Qualitative Response Models: A Survey.”Journal of Economic Literature 19 (December 1981): 1483–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Richard. “Union Organizing and the Allocation of Union Resources.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 34 (October 1980): 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, Jeanne. “Behavioral Research on Unions and Union Management Systems.” In Barry Staw and Larry L. Cummings, eds.,Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1980, pp. 177–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • __ and Tove H. Hammer. “Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations.” In Thomas Kochan, Daniel Mitchell, and Lee Dyer, eds.,Industrial Relations Research in the 1970’s: Review and Appraisal. Madison, Wis.: IRRA, 1982, pp. 221–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotslaw, Irving. “Attitude of Retail Workers Toward Union Organization.”Labor Law Journal 18 (March 1967): 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Case R., Jack M. McLeod, William D. Luetscher, and Gina Garramone. “Mass Communication and Voter Volatility.”Public Opinion Quarterly 45 (Spring 1981): 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffe, Steven H. and Sun Yuel Choe. “Time of Decision and Media Use During the Ford-Carter Campaign.”Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (Spring 1980): 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, William. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Union Certification Elections.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (April 1983): 402–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, James and Marian Extejt. “New Strategies in Union Organizing.”Journal of Labor Research 4 (Winter 1983): 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, William J. “Party Effort and Its Impact on the Vote.”American Political Science Review 65 (May 1971): 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, William T. “The Effect of Company Campaigns on Certification Elections:Law and Realty Once Again.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (July 1983): 560–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, Edward C. “Media Use and Electoral Choice.”Public Opinion Quarterly 35 (Winter 1971–72): 544–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eames, Patricia. “An Analysis of the Union Voting Study from a Trade Unionist’s Point of View.”Stanford Law Review 28 (February 1976): 1181–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, Ralph and Benjamin Hawkins. “Do Union Organizing Activities Affect Decertification?”Journal of Labor Research 3 (Spring 1982): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito, Jack and Charles R. Greer. “Determinants of U.S. Unionism: Past Research and Future Needs.”Industrial Relations 21 (Winter 1982): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Robert. “The Behavioral Foundations of Union Election Regulation.”Stanford Law Review 28 (February 1976): 1195–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. “Individual Mobility and Union Voice in the Labor Market.”American Economic Review 66 (May 1976): 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff.What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getman, Julius, Stephen Goldberg, and Jeanne Brett.Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality. New York: Basic Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, Herbert and Marcus Sandver. “Predicting the Outcome of Union Certification Elections: A Review of the Literature.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (July 1983): 537–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelweit, Hilde T., Patrick Humphreys, Marianne Joeger, and Michael Katz.How Voters Decide. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C.The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little Brown, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsh, Bernard.Diary of a Strike. 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas.Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Everett Carll and Seymour M. Lipset.Professors, Unions and American Higher Education. Berkeley: Carnegie Commission of Higher Education, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, John J. “The Impact of Management Consultants on the Outcome of Certification Elections.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38 (October 1984): 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • __ and J. Malcolm Walker. “Representation Elections in Higher Education: Occurrence and Outcomes.”Journal of Labor Research 5 (Winter 1984): 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, Gregory B. and Philip E. Converse. “A Dynamic Simultaneous Equations Model of Electoral Choice.”American Political Science Review 73 (March 1979): 1055–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, James E. “Employee Characteristics and Representation Election Outcomes.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Forthcoming, 1985.

  • McCombs, Maxwell E. “Mass Communication in Political Campaigns.” In F. Gerald Kline and Phillip J. Tichenor, eds.,Current Perspectives in Mass Communication Research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1972, pp. 169–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H. and Michael MacKuen. “Learning About the Candidates.”Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (Fall 1979): 326–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John R. Patrocik.The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, Gerald and Jeffrey Pfeffer. “A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design.”Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (June 1978): 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeber, Ronald and William Cooke. “The Decline in Union Success in NLRB Representation Elections.”Industrial Relations 22 (Winter 1983): 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, Frank J.Party Politics in America. Boston: Little, Brown, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, George. “Factors in the Unionization of a Utility Company: A Case Study.”Human Organization 12 (Fall 1953): 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voos, Paula. “Union Organizing: Costs and Benefits.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (July 1983): 576–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. Malcolm. “Transition to Bargaining in a Multicampus System.”Industrial Relations 13 (February 1974): 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • __ and John J. Lawler. “Dual Unions and Political Processes in Organizations.”Industrial Relations 18 (Winter 1979): 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, Stephen J.The Road to the White House. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for comments on an earlier version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, J.M., Lawler, J.J. Union campaign activities and voter preferences. Journal of Labor Research 7, 19–40 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685298

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685298

Keywords

Navigation