Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of extrusion strains produced by cosine and conical dies

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visioplastic analysis is used to compare strain fields produced in cylindrical aluminum billets extruded at elevated temperature through axially symmetric dies that have either a cosine or a conical profile. The visioplastic method consists of computing strain rates from changes experienced in a flow function as a billet passes through the extrusion die. The flow function is constructed using a grid that is stamped on an axial plane of the billet before extrusion. After the partially extruded billet is removed from the die numerical methods are used to determine the strain rates from the deformed grid. The state of strain over the extrusion region is computed using transformation and then integration of the strain rates. Results show that, unlike the conical die, the cosine die does not produce strains of reversed sign in the die entry region. The consequent benefits of using cosine dies for extrusion of powder metals are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Meta-Petri and J. Frisch, Metal Flow through Various Mathematically Contoured Extrusion Dies,First North American Metal Working Research Conf. Proc, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1977, p 99–104

  2. R. Srinivasan, J.S. Gunasekera, H.L. Gegel, and S.M. Doraivelu, Extrusion through Controlled Strain Rate Dies,J. Mater. Shaping Technol, Vol 8 (No. 2), 1990, p 133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J.S. Gunasekera, H.L. Gegel, J.C. Malas, S.M. Doraivelu, and D. Barker, CAD/CAM of Streamlined Dies,Proc. 9th Conf. Advances in the Production of Tubes, Bars and Shapes, American Society for Metals, 1985, p 13–21

  4. D. Shafry, J. Tirosh, and A. Ber, CAD-CAM of Three-Dimensional Dies for Optimized Extrusion,Manuf. Rev., Vol 2 (No. 1), 1989, p 60–65

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.H. Han, D.Y. Yang, and M. Kiuchi, A New Formulation for Three-Dimensional Extrusion and Its Application to Extrusion of Clover Sections,Int. J. Mech. Sci., Vol 28 (No. 4), 1986, p 201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D.Y. Yang, C.H. Han, and M.U. Kim, A Generalized Method for Analysis of Three-Dimensional Extrusion of Arbitrarily-Shaped Sections,Int. J. Mech. Sci., Vol 28 (No. 8), 1986, p 517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.C. Malas, J.T. Morgan, H.L. Gegel, J.S. Gunasekera, and S.M. Doraivelu, An Investigation on the Mathematical-Modeling Technique Used for Analyzing Industrial Metal-Working Processes,Proc. 11th NAMRC Conf, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1983, p 202–210

  8. D.G. Berghaus and H.B. Peacock, Deformation and Strain Analysis for High Extrusion Ratios and Elevated Temperatures,Exp. Mech., Vol 25 (No. 3), 1985, p 301–307; Vol 25 (No. 4), 1985, p 404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H.B. Peacock and D.G. Berghaus, Strain Fields for Aluminum at Different Tooling Temperatures and Extrusion Ratios,Proc. 9th Conf. Advances in the Production of Tubes, Bars and Shapes, American Society for Metals, 1985, p 1–12

  10. D.G. Berghaus, R.J. Primas, and H.B. Peacock, Strain Analysis for Extrusion of Powder Metals,Exp. Mech., Vol 28 (No. 9), 1988, p 232–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Laue and H. Stenger,Extrusion Processes, Machinery and Tooling, American Society for Metals, 1981, p 6–9

  12. TO. Woods, D.G. Berghaus, and H.B. Peacock, The Mechanical Behavior of Extruded Powder Aluminum Subjected to Biaxial Loadings at Elevated Temperature,Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Experimental Mechanics, Permanent Committee for Stress Analysis, 1990, p 582–590

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berghaus, D.G., McCue, J.M. & Peacock, H.B. Comparison of extrusion strains produced by cosine and conical dies. JMEP 4, 25–31 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02682701

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02682701

Keywords

Navigation