Abstract
Studies of the unstable propagation and arrest of brittle fractures were conducted on four steels: plain carbon steel, 3 pct Si steel, A-517, and 4340. Unstable fractures were initiated in double-cantilever-beam test specimens by forcing a wedge between the two beams under compression. These fractures propagate at essentially constant wedge opening displacement and can be made to arrest within the confines of the specimen. The strain energy stored in the specimen at the onset of propagation was varied systematically by changing the root radius of the starting slot. The experiments show that Ka, the stress intensity at arrest, is not a materials constant but depends on the strain energy stored in the specimen. Values of άrcR, the average energy dissipation rate during propagation, calculated for the four steels, are in the range2 3- GIc ≲ άcrR ≲ G{Ic}. Detailed metallographic examinations show that brittle fractures appear highly segmented on interior sections, but that the individual segments are interconnected. This morphology is attributed to isolated, difficult-to-cleave regions, comparable in size to the grains, which are bypassed and remain unbroken at relatively large distances behind the crack front. Etching studies conducted on a silicon steel reveal that the plastic deformation attending crack propagation is largely confined to the plastic stretching of the ligaments behind the crack front. Increases in the size, number, and toughness of the ligaments with temperature coincide with the brittle-to-ductile transition. An analytical model consisting of an elastic crack with a regular array of tractions representing the ligaments supports the view that the ligaments are the principal source of brittle crack propagation resistance in the steels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. S. Pellini and P. P. Puzak: NRL Report 5920, U. S. Naval Research Laboratory, March 15,1963.
T. S. Robertson:J. Iron Steel lnst, 1953, vol. 175, p. 361.
Y. Akita and K. Ikeda: Transportation Tech. Research Inst., Report 56, Tokyo, December 1962.
M. Yoshiki, T. Kanazawa, and S. Machida:Proc. Seventh Japanese Cong. Test. Mater., 1964, p. 71.
A. A. Wells:Weld. Res., 1953, vol. 7, p. 34.
R. Weichen and K. Schonert:Int. J. of Frac. Mech., 1969, vol. 5, p. 353.
H. Itagaki, T. Kanazawa, and M. Yokhiki:Studies on the Brittle Fracture Problems in Japan, M. Yoshiki and T. Kanazawa, eds., Soc. of Naval Architects of Japan, 1967, vol. 13, p. 72.
R. G. Hoagland:Trans ASME, 1967, vol. 89, Series D, p. 525.
J. Eftis and J. M. Kraffit:Trans ASME, 1964, vol. 87, Series D, p. 257.
F. P. Videon, F. W. Barton, and W. J. Hall:SSC Report 147,1963.
K. B. Brobeig:Arkiv Fys., 1960, vol. 18, p. 159.
J. G. Williams, J. C. Radon, and C. E. Turner:Polymer Eng. Sci., 1968, vol. 5, p. 130.
A. R. Rosenfield and P. N. Mincer: to be published in theProc. of the Battelle-Institute Seminar on Molecular Order held in Seattle, Wash., October, 1970.
F. F. Videon, F. W. Barton, and W. J. Hall:Ship Structure Committee Report SSC-148,1963.
J. M. Krafft and A. M. Sullivan:Trans ASM, 1963, vol. 56, p. 160.
J. Dvorak:Fracture 1969, P. L. Pratt,et ai, eds., Chapman and Hall, London, 1969, p. 338.
P. B. Crosley and E. J. Ripling:Trans ASME, 1969, vol. 91, Series D, p. 525.
G. T. Hahn, W. S. Owen, B. L. Averbach, and M. Cohen:Weld. J., September, 1959, p. 367-S.
G. T. Hahn, B. L. Averbach, W. S. Owen, and M. Cohen:Fracture, Proc. Swampscott Conf., p. 91, John Wiley, New York, 1959.
G. T. Hahn, P. N. Mincer, and A. R. Rosenfield:Exp. Mech., 1971, vol. 11, p. 248.
J. J. Benbow and F. C. Roesler:Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 1957, vol. B70, p. 201.
W. F. Brown and J. E. Srawley:Plane Strain Crack Toughness Testing of High Strength Metallic Materials, Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Spec. Tech. Publ. 410, 1967.
D. P. Clausing:Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1969, vol. 5, p. 211.
T. R. Wilshaw, C. A. Rau, and A. S. Tetelman:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1968, vol. 1, p. 191.
A. K. Shoemaker and S. T. Rolfe:Trans. ASME, 1969, vol. 91, Series D. p. 512.
G. T. Hahn, M. Sarrate, and A. R. Rosenfleld:Plastic Zones in Fe-3 Si Steel Double-Cantilever-Beam Specimens, Int. J. Fract. Mech. (in press).
C. Atkinson and J. D. Eshelby:Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1968, vol. 4, p. 3.
J. I. Bluhm:Fracture, H. Liebowitz, ed., vol. 5, 1969, p. 1.
J. M. Krafft:Appl. Mater. Res., vol. 3, 1964, p. 88.
H. C. van Elst:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1964, vol. 230, p. 460.
M. F. Kanninen:Int. J. of Fract. Mech., (in press).
B. Gross and J. E. Srawley:NASA Tech. Note, TND-3295, February, 1966.
J. D. Eshelby:Inelastic Behavior of Solids, Kanninen, Adler, Rosenfield, Jaffee, eds., p. 77, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.
J. P. Berry:J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1960, vol. 8, p. 194.
N. I. Muskhelishvili:Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Noordhoff, Holland, 1953.
D. S. Dugdale:J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1960, vol. 8, p. 100.
P. C. Paris and G. C. Sih:Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Spec. Tech. Publ. 381, 1965, p. 30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoagland, R.G., Rosenfield, A.R. & Hahn, G.T. Mechanisms of fast fracture and arrest in steels. Metall Trans 3, 123–136 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02680591
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02680591