Abstract
The crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) of small surface fatigue cracks (lengths of the grain size) in Al 2219-T851 depends upon the location of a crack relative to the grain boundaries. Both CTOD and crack tip closure stress are greatest when the crack tip is a large distance from the next grain boundary in the direction of crack propagation. Contrary to behavioral trends predicted by continuum fracture mechanics, crack length has no detectable effect on the contribution of plastic deformation to CTOD. It is apparent from these observations that the region of significant plastic deformation is confined by the grain boundaries, resulting in a plastic zone size that is insensitive to crack length and to external load.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a:
-
Crack depth
- c :
-
Half crack length measured perpendicular to the stress axis
- CTOD:
-
Crack tip opening displacement measured at maximum cyclic tensile stress
- CTOD:
-
Average of the CTOD values of the two crack tips at the surface
- CTOD e :
-
Elastic component of CTOD
- CTOD p :
-
Plastic component of CTOD
- R p :
-
Plastic zone radius
- z0 :
-
Distance of crack tip to grain boundary, measured perpendicular to the stress axis
- α:
-
Material parameter relating closure stress to crack size and location
- δ:
-
Crack opening displacement at any location along crack, measured parallel to the stress axis
- δ(σ) :
-
Crack opening displacement at crack center for surface stress, σ
- ε:
-
Strain in the plastic zone
- σ :
-
Surface stress
- σ cc :
-
Crack tip closure stress
- σcc :
-
Average of σcc for two surface tips of a microcrack
- σmax :
-
Maximum tensile surface stress
- σyieid :
-
Macroscopic surface stress at 0.2 pct yield
- CTOD/δ(σmax):
-
Ratio of crack tip opening displacement to opening at crack center both measured for σ = σmax. Used as an indirect measure of plastic zone size and of crack tip closure stress
- CTOD/δ(σmax):
-
Average of CTOD/δ(σmax) for the two surface crack tips
- z0/2c:
-
Ratio of distance of crack tip to grain boundary to microcrack length. Used to estimate crack closure stress from microscopic parameters
References
J. Lankford and D. L. Davidson:Int. J. Fract., 1978, vol. 14, pp. R87–89.
W. L. Morris:Met. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, pp. 5–11.
C. Y. Kung and M. E. Fine:Met. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, pp. 603–10.
C. G. Bowles and J. Schijve:Int.J. Fract., 1973, vol. 9, pp. 171–79.
W. L. Morris:Met. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 1345–48.
W. Elber: ASTM STP 486, p. 230, Am. Soc. Test, and Mat., Philadelphia, PA, 1971.
W. L. Morris and O. Buck:Met. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 597–601.
C. K. Clark and G. C. Cassait:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1977, vol. 9, pp. 675–88.
J. R. Rice: ASTM STP 415, Am. Soc. Test and Mat., pp. 247–309, 1967.
W. L. Morris:Met. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 1087–93.
A. E. Green and I. N. Sneddon:Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc, 1950, vol. 46, pp. 159–64.
N. J. I. Actams:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1972, vol. 4, pp. 543–54.
O. Buck, J. D. Frandsen, C. L. Ho, and H. L. Marcus:The Microstructure and Design of Alloys Vol. 1, p. 462, The Institute of Metals and Iron and Steel Institute, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morris, W.L. The noncontinuum crack tip deformation behavior of surface microcracks. Metall Trans A 11, 1117–1123 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02668135
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02668135