Abstract
Reflections on mathematics-based actions and practices bring an ethical dimension to the notion of reflection, and this is the aspect I consider and develop in this essay.
I elaborate on the notion of reflection by addressing eight different issues. (1)The necessity of reflection emerges from the observation that mathematics-based actions do not have any intrinsic link to progress by virtue of being mathematics-based. Such actions can be as complex and as questionable as any other actions. (2) Although reflections, from this perspective, are believed to be necessary, one could cite afunctionality of non-reflection. For example, non-reflection enables the school mathematics tradition to continue to ensure that the future labour force has particular competencies in the right measures to match the social order for which they are destined. (3) Reflections often presupposespecificity, as they include general as well as specific reconsiderations with respect to some knowledge, actions and practices. (4) I usecollectivity of reflections to refer to the observation that ethical considerations can be facilitated through interaction and communication. Often this presupposes that challenging questions be formulated in order to open up the ethical dimension with respect to mathematics in action. (5) Reflections presuppose directedness and involvement, and this brings me to analyse theintentionality of reflections. (6) Reflections can address very many different issues, which leads me to recognise thediversity of reflections. (7) It is easy to ignore or to obstruct reflections, and when reflections emerge, they can easily be eliminated from an educational context. We should never ignore thefragility of reflections. (8) This brings me to recognise theuncertainty of reflection. Reflections cannot rely on any solid foundation. Still, I find that reflections are necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alro, H. & Skovsmose, O. (2002).Dialogie and Learning in Mathematics Education: Intention, Reflection, Critique. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Arendt, H. (1977).Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Books. (First published 1963).
Beck, U. (1992).risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE Publications.
Beck, U. (1999).World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Foucault, M. (1989).The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge. (First French edition 1969).
Foucault, M. (1994).The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books. (First French edition 1966).
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994).The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Publications.
Skovsmose, O. (1994).Towards a Philosophy of Critical Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Skovsmose, O. (2001). Landscapes of Investigation.Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 33(4), 123–132.
Skovsmose, O. & Yasukawa, K., (2004). Formatting Power of ‘Mathematics in a Package’: A Challenge for Social Theorising?Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal. (http://www.ex.ac.uk/∼PErnest/pome18/contents.htm)
Skovsmose, O. (2005a). Foregrounds and Politics of Learning Obstactles.For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 4–10.
Skovsmose, O. (2005b).Travelling Through Education: Uncertainty, Mathematics, Responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skovsmose, O. Reflections as a challenge. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 38, 323–332 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652792
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652792