Abstract
The response of Inconel 718 nickel-base alloy to thermomechanical processing (TMP) utilizing a 510 Kbar planar shock wave was evaluated. The results were compared with those of conventional TMP by cold rolling to 19.1 pct reduction in thickness; this provided a generalized (or effective) strain equivalent to the transient shock strain. Instead of deformation in the solution treated condition, the inclusion of a predeformation, partial aging step in an optimized TMP schedule led to the greatest improvements in strength, stress-rupture life, and low-cycle fatigue life. The mechanical behavior was correlated with substructure and microstructure. Predeformation aging inhibits thermal recovery during final aging and produces a uniform dispersion of γ′’ precipitates. On a generalized (or effective) strain basis, conventional TMP by cold rolling produces higher strengths than shock TMP due to a higher dislocation density in the former. This suggests that maximum shear strain is a better basis of comparison. Since dislocation substructure is the primary contributor to property modification of Inconel 718 by TMP, the effective service temperature of thermomechanically processed material is limited to 1200°F (649°C), irrespective of the method of working.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. H. Couts, Jr. and J. E. Coyne:Proc. 2nd Conf. on Superalloys, Chapter K, Report No. MCIC-72-10, Metals and Ceramics Information Center, Batteile Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, 1972.
C. J. Slunde and A. M. Hall: NASA TMX-53443, Batteile Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, 1966.
B. H. Kear, J. M. Oblak, and W. A. Owczarski:J. Metals, 1972, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 25–32.
F. M. Richmond:J. Eng. Power, 1967, vol. 89, pp. 61–74.
R. S. Cremisio, H. M. Butler, and J. F. Radavich:J. Metals, 1969, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 55–61.
R. F. Decker:Steel-Strengthening Mechanisms, pp. 147-70, Climax Molydenum Co., 1969.
J. C. Uy, C. J. Nolan, and T. E. Davidson:Trans. ASM, 1967, vol. 60, pp. 693–98.
R. N. Orava:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1973, vol. 11, pp. 177–80.
R. N. Orava: Denver Research Institute, University of Denver, Final Report No. DRI 2638, Contract No. N62269-73-C-0376, U.S. Naval Air Systems Command, 1974.
M. A. Meyers: Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, 1974.
H. J. Wagner, R. S. Burns, T. E. Caroll, and R. C. Simon:Nickel-Base Alloys/ Alloy 718, Defense Metals Information Center, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, 1968.
M. Conserva, M. Buratti, E. Di Russo, and F. Gatto:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1973, vol. 11, pp. 103–12.
R. A. Heacox:Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. on Superalloys, Chapter P, Report No. MCIC-72-10, Metals and Ceramics Information Center, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, 1972.
A. Kaufman and S. Niedzwiedz:Proc. of the Conference on Quantitative Relation Between Properties and Microstructures, Israel University Press, 1969, pp. 139-44.
J. P. Stroup and R. A. Heacox:J. Metals, 1969, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 46–54.
D. R. Muzyka and G. N. Maniar:Metals Eng. Quart., 1969, November, pp. 23–36.
C. S. Smith:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1958, vol. 212, pp. 574–89.
L. M. Clarebrough, M. E. Hargreaves, and G. W. Est:Proc. Roy. Soc., London, 1955, vol. 232A, pp. 252–70.
R. W. K. Honeycombe:The Plastic Deformation of Metals, pp. 289–300, St. Martins Press, New York, 1968.
H. E. MCoy, Jr. and D. L. McElroy:Trans. ASM, 1968, vol. 61, pp. 730–41.
A. Christou and N. Brown:Phil. Mag., 1973, vol. 27, pp. 281–96.
R. L. Nolder and G. Thomas:Acta Met., 1964, vol. 12, pp. 227–40.
G. E. Dieter:Response of Metals to High Velocity Deformation, P. G Shewnon and V. F. Zackay, eds., pp. 409–45, Interscience, New York, 1961.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyers, M.A., Orava, R.N. Thermomechcmical processing of Inconel 718 by shock-wave deformation. Metall Trans A 7, 179–190 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02644455
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02644455