Skip to main content
Log in

Soap-based detergent formulations: XVIII. Effect of structure variations on surface-active properties of sulfur containing amphoteric surfactants

  • Iechnical
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society

Abstract

Quaternary ammonium amphoteric surfactants have been found in the past to be excellent lime soap dispersing agents and detergents but exhibit unusual solubility behavior. In search of a relationship between chemical structure and surface-active properties, compounds having the following general formula were synthesized: ZN+(CH3)2(CH2)nX, where Z is C12H25-, C14H29-, C16H33-, or C15H31CONHC3H6-, n is 2, 3, or 4 and X is SO3- or OSO3-. Tertiary amines were converted to sulfobetaines (X=SO3-) by reaction with (a) butanesultone (n=4), (b) propanesultone (n=3), or (c) sodium 2-bromoethanesulfonate (n=2). An alternate synthesis for the sulfoethylbetaines (n=2) involved the reaction of the tertiary amines with ethylene bromide, followed by treatment with sodium sulfite. All sulfated quaternary ammonium compounds (X=OSO3-) were synthesized by treatment of the tertiary amine with the appropriate chloroalcohol, followed by sulfation with chlorosulfonic acid. The sulfated quaternary ammonium amphoterics are stable to acid hydrolysis, and alkaline stability improves with increasing bridge chain length. Sulfoethyl amphoterics are less water soluble than sulfobutyl, which in turn are less soluble than sulfopropyl derivatives of the same alkyl chain length. For the most part, the sulfated amphoterics are insoluble but are solubilized by soap. The lime soap dispersing properties improve as the carbon chain bridge length increases for both the sulfates and sulfonates. Formulations of tallow soap, amphoteric surfactant, and sodium silicates gave good detergency in most cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parris, N., J.K. Weil, and W.M. Linfield, JAOCS 50:509 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parris, N., J.K. Weil, and W.M. Linfield, Ibid. 53:60 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnhurst, J.D., J. Org. Chem. 26:4520 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Snoddy, A.O., in “Organic Syntheses Collective Volume,” Vol IV, Edited by Norman Rabjohn, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1963, p. 529.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helberger, J.H., and H. Lantermann, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 586:158 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Staff, D., and R.M. Hixon, in “Organic Syntheses Collective Volume,” Vol II, Edited by A.H. Blatt, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1943, p. 571.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weil, J.K., A.J. Stirton, and E.A. Barr, JAOCS 43:157 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weil, J.K., N. Parris, and A.J. Stirton, Ibid. 47:91 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Démarcq, M., and D. Dervichian, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 12:939 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borghetty, H.C., and C.A. Bergman, JAOCS 27:88 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hikota, T., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 43:2236 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Parris, N., Weil, J.K. & Linfield, W.M. Soap-based detergent formulations: XVIII. Effect of structure variations on surface-active properties of sulfur containing amphoteric surfactants. J Am Oil Chem Soc 53, 97–100 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02635957

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02635957

Keywords

Navigation