Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the ditallowdimethylammonium chloride interaction with cellulose

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

From a theoretical standpoint, the driving force for the deposition of ditallowdimethylammonium chloride (“DTDMAC” or “quat”) onto cotton must be distinguished from the nature of its interaction with cellulose. We found that the driving force is purely hydrophobic. Due to its strong hydrophobicity, DTDMAC is expelled out of the aqueous rinse bath and deposits onto available surfaces. Besides its tendency not to leave the cotton surface and return to solution (hydrophobic effect), it binds to cellulose by weak London dispersion forces. A strong Coulombic interaction occurs only when a negative charge is present. Consequently, the strong affinity of DTDMAC for cellulose mainly results from the large specific surface area of the fiber; negative charges play a secondary role. Much experimental evidence supports the hydrophobic nature of DTDMAC adsorption onto cellulose. DTDMAC deposits onto charge-free surfaces; its deposition is mainly governed by the available surface area, not by the surface nature. The hydrophobic nature of the interaction of DTDMAC with cotton may be displayed and distinguished from electrostatic binding. Structural effects demonstrate the correlation between hydrophobicity, deposition and the softening power of quaternaries. This model proposes a single mechanism to account for the deposition of DTDMAC onto cotton and synthetics. It is consistent with experimental facts that remain unexplained by the electrostatic model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armak Chemicals Product Bulletin/3.3 (Akzo Chemie), Amersfoort.

  2. Berenbold, H.,Tenside Surf. Det. 27:34 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bräuer, K., H. Fehr and R. Puchta, Ibid.:281 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bräuer, K., H. Nüsslein and R. Puchta,Seifen-Öle-Fette-Wachse 111:337 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gillis, A.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 64:887 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Milwidsky, B.,HAPPI 9:40 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Puchta, R.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61:367 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramsbotham, J.,Fabric Conditioners, International Flavor and Fragrance-Hilversum, 1989, pp. 2–4, 23, 63.

  9. Ramsbotham, J.,Ibid., p. 12.

  10. Rosen, M.J.,Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, 2nd edn., J. Wiley, New York, 1989, p. 19, 378.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sobisch, T.,Tenside Surf. Det. 29:3 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evans, W.P.,Chem. Ind. July:893 (1969).

  13. Müller, H., and E. Krempl,Fette Seifen Anstrichm. 65:532 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sexsmith, F.H., and H.J. White, Jr.,J. Colloid Sci. 14:598 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Suzawa, T., and M. Yuzawa,Yukagaku 15:20 (1966);Chem. Abs. 64:12864b (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Senden, K.G., and J. Koning,Fette Seifen Anstrichm. 70:36 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weatherburn, B.,Textile Res. J. 22:797 (1952).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beal, C.M., L.A. Olson and M. Wentz,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 67:689 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Egan, R.R., Ibid.:118 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Franks, F., inChemistry and Technology of Water-Soluble Polymers, edited by C.A. Finch, Plenum Press, New York, 1983, p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jencks, W.P.,Catalysis in Chemistry and Enzymology, McGraw Hill, New York, 1969, pp. 418–428.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kauzmann, W.,Advances in Protein Chem. 14:37 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tanford, C.,The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes, J. Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1980, pp. 2–4, 24–26, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Auerbach, M.E.,Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 15:49 (1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Auerbach, M.E., Ibid.:739 (1944).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw, D.J.,Introduction to Colloid and Surface Chemistry, 3rd edn., Butterworths, 1983, p. 149.

  27. Laughlin, R.G., inCationic Surfactants—Surfactant Series, Vol. 37, edited by D.N. Rubingh, and P.M. Holland, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1991, p. 464.

    Google Scholar 

  28. White, H.J., Jr., in Ibid., Vol. 4, 1970, p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stackelberg, M., W. Kling, W. Benzel and F. Wilke,Kolloid Z. 135:67 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hughes, G.K., and S.D. Koch,Soap Cosmet. Chem. Spec. Dec:109 (1965).

  31. Paulus, W., and O. Pauli,Textilveredlung 6:217 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bücking, H.W., K. Lötzch, and G. Tüber,Tenside Deterg. 16:2 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Linfield, W.M., J.C. Sherrill, G.A. Davis and R.M. Raschke,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 35:590 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Crutzen, A.M. Study of the ditallowdimethylammonium chloride interaction with cellulose. J Am Oil Chem Soc 72, 137–143 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02635791

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02635791

Key words

Navigation