Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research, academic rank, and compensation of women and men faculty in academic general internal medicine

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the status of men and women faculty in academic general internal medicine, including their professional training, faculty responsibilities, research performance, academic rank, and compensation, to determine whether systematic differences exist by gender.

Design/setting:The authors analyzed responses to a 55-part questionnaire sent to all full-time general internal medicine faculty at the major teaching hospitals in the United States. Unadjusted means were generated for men versus women faculty in demographics, training background, hours of work, professional time allocations, institutional support, professional self-assessment, research performance, academic rank, and compensation. Means were recalculated after adjusting for other variables using multivariate methods.

Results:The authors found no significant difference in the frequency of fellowship training between men and women faculty. Women and men perform similar professional activities, but even after multivariate adjustment, women devote less time to research and perceive less research skill and institutional support for their research, but have similar numbers of grants, abstracts, and publications in refereed journals and have similar academic ranks. Women faculty, however, receive lower compensation than do men faculty, even after adjustment.

Conclusion:While the characteristics of men and women faculty are quite similar, including those defining their academic productivity, important differences exist in research time, perceived institutional support, and compensation. These differences cannot be explained by such obvious factors as age differentials, academic rank, or hours of work per week.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bickel J. Women in medical education: a status report. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1579–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Promotion and tenure of women and minorities on medical school facilities. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:63–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dial TH, Bickel J, Lewicki AM. Sex differences in rank attainment among radiology and internal medicine faculty. Acad Med. 1989;64:198–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson MP. The status of women in medicine: background data. J Am Med Wom Assoc. 1981;36:62–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cole JR. Fair science: women in the scientific community. New York: Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wallis LA, Gilder H. Thaler H. Advancement of men and women in medical academics: a pilot study. JAMA. 1981;246:2350–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heins M. Update: women in medicine. J Am Med Wom Assoc. 1985;40:43–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman RH, Pozen JT, Rosencrans AL, Eisenberg JM, Gertman PM. General internal medicine units in academic medical centers: their emergence and functions. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:233–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenberg JM. Cultivating a new field: development of a research program in general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1(J/A suppl):S8-S18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beaty HM, Babbott D, Higgins EJ, Jolly P, Leven GS. Research activities of faculty in academic departments of medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:90–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorber J, Ecker, M. Career development of female and male physicians. J Med Educ. 1983;58:447–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergquist SR, Duchae BW, Schaim VA, Zastron JF, Barr VL, Borowrecki T. Perceptions of freshman medical students of gender differences in medical specialty choice. J Med Educ. 1985;60:39–83.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Calkins EV, Willoughby TL, Arnold LM. Gender and psychosocial factors associated with specialty choice. J Am Med Wom Assoc. 1987;42:170–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zimny GH, Shelton BR. Sex differences in medical specialty preferences. J Med Educ. 1982;57:403–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Babbott D, Baldwin DC, Jolly P, Williams DJ. The stability of early specialty preferences among US medical school graduates in 1983. JAMA. 1988;259:1970–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuckerman H. Persistence and change in careers of men and women scientists and engineers: a review of current research. In: Div LS (ed). Women: their underrepresentation and career differentials in science and engineering: proceedings of a conference. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cole JR, Zuckerman H. Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Sci Am. 1987;256:119–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Graves PL, Thomas CB. Correlates of midlife career achievement among women physicians. JAMA. 1985;254:781–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Levinson W, Tolle SW, Lewis C. Women in academic medicine combining career and family. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1511–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Working women in New England, 1988. News, United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. USDL-134. June 15, 1989.

  21. Bobula JD. Work patterns, practice characteristics and incomes of male and female physicians. J Med Educ. 1980;55:826–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bowman M, Gross ML. Overview of research on women in medicine—issues for public policy makers. Publ Health Rep. 1986;101:513–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Sections of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital, USA

    Robert H. Friedman MD, Mark A. Moskowitz MD & Lewis E. Kazis ScD

  2. Boston City Hospital, Boston University School of Medicine, USA

    Harrison G. Weed MD

  3. the General Medicine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

    Phyllis Carr MD

Authors
  1. Phyllis Carr MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert H. Friedman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark A. Moskowitz MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lewis E. Kazis ScD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Harrison G. Weed MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carr, P., Friedman, R.H., Moskowitz, M.A. et al. Research, academic rank, and compensation of women and men faculty in academic general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med 7, 418–423 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599159

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599159

Key words

Search

Navigation