Abstract
The thermal diffusivity of various types of aluminum has been measured, using a completely noncontact experimental configuration based on infrared photothermal radiometry. Photothermal response transients, conventional frequency scans, and pulse duration- or repetition rate-scanned rate windows have been investigated. It has been shown that the conventional frequency scan is not suitable for measurements of aluminum with a short thermal transport time such as foils, due to an extremely degraded signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Also, it has been found that the conventional frequency scan method is less sensitive to the actual value of thermal diffusivity than the rate-window scan. The rate-window method, furthermore, gives superior SNR especially for thin metals and yields excellent agreement between the theory and the data. An advantage of the pulse duration-scanned rate window mode is that it does not require knowledge of the instrumental transfer function as an input. The transient response gives the worst SNR but is best for the physical interpretation of the photothermal signals. In addition, it has been shown that the infrared photothermal radiometric transmission mode is less sensitive to surface roughness than the reflection mode and, therefore, is preferable for thermal diffusivity measurements of aluminum and of good thermal conductors, in general.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Munidasa, T.-C. Ma, A. Mandelis, S. K. Brown, and L. Mannik,Mat. Sci. Eng. A159:111 (1992).
E. V. Kudryivtsev,Unsteady State Heat Transfer (Hiffe Book, London, 1966), p. 94.
H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger,Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed., (Oxford University. Oxford, 1959).
W. P. Leung and A. C. Tam,J. Appl. Phys. 56:153 (1984).
Z.-H. Chen and A. Mandelis,Phys. Rer. B 46:13526 (1992).
A. Mandelis and Z.-H. Chen,Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63:2977 (1992).
A. Mandelis,Rer. Sci. Instrum. 65:3309 (1994).
P. E. Nordal and S. O. Kanstad,Phys. Scripta 20:659 (1979).
R. E. Imhof, B. Zhang, and D. J. S. Birch, inProgress in Photothermal and Photoacoustic Science and Technology, Vol. II, A. Mandelis, ed., (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1994). Chap. 7.
Supplied by ALCAN, Kingston, ON.
F. Kreith,Principles of Heat Transfer (IEP-A Dun-Donnelley, New York, 1976).
E. R. G. Eckert and R. M. Drake,Analysis of Heat and Mass Transfer (McGraw Hill, New York, 1972).
D. J. Crowther and J. Padet,Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 34:3075 (1991).
A. Mandelis,J. Appl. Phys. 78:647 (1995).
P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach,Methods of Theoretical Physics (McGraw Hill, New York, 1953), p. 864.
W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery,Numerical Methods in C. 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992), pp. 354–366.
L. Qian and P. Li,Appl. Opt. 29:4241 (1990).
M. Munidasa and A. Mandelis,Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65:2344 (1994).
R. S. Quimby and W. M. Yen,Appl. Phys. Lett. 35:43 (1979).
W. D. Lawson and J. W. Sabey, inResearch Techniques in NDT, R. S. Sharpe, ed. Academic, London, 1970, Chap. 4.
M. G. Dreyfus,Appl. Opt. 2:1113 (1963).
D. L. Balageas, J. C. Krapez, and P. Cielo,J. Appl. Phys. 59:348 (1986).
Y. S. Touloukian, R. W. Powell, C. Y. Ho, and M. C. Nicolaou,Thermophysical Properties of Matter, Vol. 10 (IFI Plenum, New York, 1973).
X. Zhang and C. Grigoropoulos,Rer. Sci. Instrum. 66:1115 (1995).
A. Rosencwaig and A. Gersho,J. Appl. Phys. 47:64 (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacCormack, E., Mandelis, A., Munidasa, M. et al. Measurements of the thermal diffusivity of aluminum using frequency-scanned, transient, and rate window photothermal radiometry. Theory and experiment. Int J Thermophys 18, 221–250 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02575209
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02575209