Solubility relationships of aluminum and iron minerals associated with acid mine drainage

Abstract

The ability to properly manage the oxidation of pyritic minerals and associated acid mine drainage is dependent upon understanding the chemistry of the disposal environment. One accepted disposal method is placing pyritic-containing materials in the groundwater environment. The objective of this study was to examine solubility relationships of Al and Fe minerals associated with pyritic waste disposed in a low leaching aerobic saturated environment. Two eastern oil shales were used in this oxidizing equilibration study, a New Albany Shale (unweathered, 4.6 percent pyrite), and a Chattanooga Shale (weathered, 1.5 percent pyrite). Oil shale samples were equilibrated with distilled-deionized water from 1 to 180 d with a 1∶1 solid-to-solution ratio. The suspensions were filtered and the clear filtrates were analyzed for total cations and anions. Ion activities were calculated from total concentrations. Below pH 6.0, depending upon SO ²⁻₄ activity, Al³⁺ solubility was controlled by AlOHSO₄ (solid phase) for both shales. Initially, Al³⁺ solubility for the New Albany Shale showed equilibrium with amorphous Al(OH)₃. The pH decreased with time, and Al³⁺ solubility approached equilibrium with AlOHSO_4(s). Below pH 6.0, Fe³⁺ solubility appeared to be regulated by a basic iron sulfate solid phase with the stoichiometric composition of FeOHSO_4(s). The results of this study indicate that below pH 6.0, Al³⁺ solubilities, are limited by basic Al and Fe sulfate solid phases (AlOHSO_4(s) and FeHSO_4(s)). The results from this study further indicate that the acidity in oil shale waters is produced from the hydrolysis of Al³⁺ and Fe³⁺ activities in solution. These results indicate a fundamental change in the stoichiometric equations used to predict acidity from iron sulfide oxidation. The results of this study also indicate that water quality predictions associated with acid mine drainage can be based on fundamental thermodynamic relationships. As a result, waste management decisions can be based on waste-specific/site-specific test methods.