Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Anorectal function was evaluated in eight patients who had low anterior resection of the rectum with a low anastomotic line, using an EEA stapler, with determination of function based on periodic manometric studies and clinical symptoms. Immediately following surgery all patients suffered from frequent bowel actions and soiling. These symptoms improved with time and most patients could enjoy almost normal daily life by the sixth postoperative month. One month after surgery, anal canal resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure were significantly reduced and rectoanal inhibitory reflex was absent; neither showed a distinct tendency to improve thereafter. Rectal sensation and reservoir capacity, which also were seriously impaired, recovered satisfactorily by the time of the six-month examination. This suggests that an improvement of clinical symptoms following this operation is dependent upon the recovery of reservoir capacity and sensation of the neorectum, and that this operative procedure is a functionally acceptable option for low rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lane RH, Parks AG. Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1977;64:596–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keighley MR, Matheson D. Functional results of rectal excision and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1980;67:757–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Wadsworth J, Parks AG. Total excision or restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Br J Surg 1979;66:625–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudd WH. The transanal anastomosis: a sphincter-saving operation with improved continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:102–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parks AG, Percy JP. Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982;69:301–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Enker WE, Stearns MW Jr, Janov AJ. Peranal coloanal anastomosis following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:576–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fain SN, Patin CS, Morgenstern L. Use of a mechanical suturing apparatus in low colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1975;110:1079–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vezeridis M, Evans JT, Mittelman A, Ledesma EJ. EEA stapler in low anterior anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:364–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leff EI, Hoexter B, Labow SB, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP. The EEA stapler in low colorectal anastomoses: initial experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:704–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennet RC, Buls J, Kennedy JT, Hughes ES. The physiologic status of the anorectum after pull-through operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973;136:907–13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iwai N, Hashimoto K, Yamane T, et al. Physiologic status of the anorectum following sphincter-saving resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:652–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosen L, Khubchandani IT, Sheets JA, Stasik JJ, Riether RD. Clinical and manometric evaluation of continence after the Bacon two-stage pull-through procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:232–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iwai N, Hashimoto K, Kaneda H, Kojima O, Nishioka B, Majimi S. Anal sphincter function and rectal reservoir after sphincter saving operations for carcinoma of the rectum. Jpn J Surg 1983;13:420–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki H, Matsumoto K, Amano S, Fujioka M, Honzumi M. Anorectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resection. Br J Surg 1980;67:655–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams NS Durdey P, Johnston D. The outcome following sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:595–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cortesini C, Pucciani F, Carassale GL, Paparozzi C. Anorectal physiology after anterior resection and pull-through operation. Eur Surg Res 1983;15:176–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Read MG, Read NW. Role of anorectal sensation in preserving continence. Gut 1982;23:345–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hurst PA, Prout WG, Kelly JM, Bannister JJ, Walker RT. Local recurrence after low anterior resection using the staple gun. Br J Surg 1982;69:275–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer. II. The rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 1984;71:17–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Nakahara, S., Itoh, H., Mibu, R. et al. Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 31, 762–766 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02560101

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02560101

Key words

Navigation