Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical and manometric evaluation of continence after the Bacon two-stage pull-through procedure

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Twenty-eight patients who underwent the Bacon pull-through operation were evaluated for continence by clinical and radiologic means. Six patients were available for anal manometry. Eighty-three percent of those patients followed for function did not have the sensation to defecate spontaneously. They had normal functioning of the external sphincter, failure of reflex inhibition of the internal sphincter, and decreased rectal compliance secondary to fibrosis of the presacral space. These factors created a distal high-pressure zone which, when combined with sensory loss due to transection of the levators, rendered the patient continent but without the ability to defecate spontaneously unless an enema was administered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bacon HE. Evolution of sphincter muscle preservation and reestablishment of continuity in the operative treatment of rectal and sigmoidal cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1945;82:113–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schuster MM. Diagnostic value of anal sphincter pressure measurements. Hosp Pract 1973;8:115–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bacon HE. An 18-year experience with the pull-through operation for cancer with elimination of an abdominal colostomy. From: Symposium on Carcinoma of the Rectum, Anglo-American Conference on Proctology. Proc R Soc Med 1959;52(suppl):33–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bacon HE. Cancer of the rectum: pull-through operation. Penn Med J 1963;66:33–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iwai N, Hashimoto K, Yamane T, et al. Physiologic status of the anorectum following sphincter-saving resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:652–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pescatori M, Parks AG. The sphincteric and sensory components of preserved continence after ileoanal reservoir. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984;158:517–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortesini C. Anorectal reflex following sphincter-saving operations. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:320–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett RC, Buls J, Kennedy JT, Hughes ESR. The physiologic status of the anorectum after pull-through operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973;136:907–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kratzer GL, Matta M. Review of the pull-through operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:120–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant from the Dorothy Rider Pool Health Care Trust.

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, L., Khubchandani, I.T., Sheets, J.A. et al. Clinical and manometric evaluation of continence after the Bacon two-stage pull-through procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 28, 232–234 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554039

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554039

Key words

Navigation