Skip to main content
Log in

Head-up tilt table test: how far and how long?

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Autonomic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is great variation between laboratories in the angle and duration of tilt used in the head-up tilt table test. We compared the hemodynamic response to three sequential randomized 20-min tilts of 60°, 80° and 90° in 20 normal subjects. We studied 66 patients to determine the duration of tilt needed to document three types of orthostatic intolerance. Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored non-invasively. Thirty-nine patients with orthostatic hypotension of diverse causes and 17 patients with orthostatic tachycardia plus were tilted to 90° for 10 min. Ten patients with vasovagal syncope were tilted to 90° for 30 min. A multivariate analysis of variance performed to assess the hemodynamic responses to 60°, 80° and 90° tilts did not show a statistically significant difference (F=0.459). Logistic regression analyses revealed that the duration of tilt required to document orthostatic hypotension was 5 min (73% cases correctly identified), orthostatic tachycardia plus 10 min (86.5% cases correctly identified) and neurally mediated syncope 10 min (86.5% cases correctly identified). Tilt duration is a more important variable than tilt angle and the duration of the tilt should depend on the suspected cause of orthostatic intolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bannister R, Ardill L, Fentem P. Defective autonomic control of blood vessels in idiopathic orthostatic hypotension.Brain 1967;90: 725–746.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Borst C, Wieling W, Van Brederode JFM, Hond A, de Rizk LG, Dunning AJ. Mechanisms of initial heart rate response to postural change.Am J Physiol 1982;243: H676-H681.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen CS, Taylor CL, Hall VE. A study of orthostatic insufficiency by the tiltboard method.Am J Physiol 1945;143: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kenny RA, Ingram A, Bayliss J, Sutton R. Head-up tilt: a useful test for investigating unexplained syncope.Lancet 1986;1: 1352–1354.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tuckman J, Shillingford J. Effect of different degrees of tilt on cardiac output, heart rate and blood pressure in normal man.Br Heart J 1966;28: 32–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiorica V, Kem DC. Plasma norepinephrine, blood pressure and heart rate response to graded change in body position.Aviat Space Environ Med 1985;56: 1166–1171.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jansen RWMM, Lenders JWM, Thien T, Hoefnagels WHL. The influence of age and blood pressure on the hemodynamic and humoral response to head-up tilt.J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37: 528–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Härmä MI, Länsimies E. Orthostatic tolerance at different times of the day in physically average and very fit dayworkers.Ann Clin Res 1985;17: 27–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzpatrick AP, Theodorakis G, Vardas P, Sutton R. Methodology of head-up tilt testing in patients with unexplained syncope.J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17: 125–130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Raviele A, Gasparini G, DiPede F, Delise P, Bonso A, Piccolo E. Usefulness of head-up tilt test in evaluating patients with syncope of unknown origin and negative electrophysiologic study.Am J Cardiol 1990;65: 1322–1327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sneddon JF, Counihan PJ, Bashir Y, Haywood GA, Ward DE, Camm J. Assessment of autonomic function in patients with neurally mediated syncope: augmented cardiopulmonary baroreceptor responses to graded orthostatic stress.J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21: 1193–1198.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Morillo CA, Klein GJ, Jones DL, Yee R. Time and frequency domain analyses of heart rate variability during orthostatic stress in patients with neurally mediated syncope.Am J Cardiol 1994;74: 1258–1262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Waxman MB, Yao L, Cameron DA, Wald RW, Roseman J. Isoproterenol induction of vasodepressor-type reaction in vasodepressor-prone persons.Am J Cardiol 1989;63: 58–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Graybiel A, McFarland RA. The use of the tilt table test in aviation medicine.J Aviation Med 1941;12: 194–211.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McIntosh SJ, Lawson J, Kenny RA. Intravenous cannulation alters the specificity of head-up tilt table testing for vasovagal syncope in elderly patients.Age and Ageing 1994;23: 317–319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shvartz E, Meyerstein N. Tilt tolerance of young men and young women.Aerospace Med 1970;41: 253–255.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sra JS, Jazayeri MR, Avitall Bet al. comparison of cardiac pacing with drug therapy in the treatment of neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope with bradycardia or asystole.N Engl J Med 1993;328: 1085–1090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Calkins H, Kadish A, Sousa J, Rosenheck S, Morody F. Comparison of responses to isoproterenol and epinephrine during head-up tilt in suspected vasodepressor syncope.Am J Cardiol 1991;67: 207–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. de Jong-de vos van Steenwijk CCE, Wieling W, Johannes JMet al. Incidence and hemodynamic characteristics of near-fainting in healthy 6 to 16 year old subjects.J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25: 1615–1621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spodick DH, Lance VQ. Comparative orthostatic responses: standing versus head-up tilt.Aviat Space Environ Med 1977;48: 432–433.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moya A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Sagrista-Sauleda Jet al. Limitations of head-up tilt test for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in patients with vasovagal syncope: results of a controlled study of Etilefrine versus placebo.J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25: 65–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grubb BP, Wolfe D, Temesy-Armos P, Hahn H, Elliott L. Reproducibility of head upright tilt table test results in patients with syncope.PACE 1992;15: 1477–1481.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen MY, Goldenberg IF, Milsteinet al. Cardiac electrophysiologic and hemodynamic correlates of neurally mediated syncope.Am J Cardiol 1989;63: 66–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Milstein S, Buetikofer J, Dunnigan A, Benditt DG, Gornick C, Reyes WJ. usefulness of Disopyramide for prevention of upright tilt-induced hypotension-bradycardia.Am J Cardiol 1990;65: 1339–1344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Low PA, Opfer-Gehrking TL, McPhee BRet al. Prospective evaluation of clinical characteristics of orthostatic hypotension.Mayo Clin Proc 1995;70: 617–622.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pongiglione G, Fish FA, Strasburger JF, Benson W. Heart rate and blood pressure response to upright tilt in young patients with unexplained syncope.J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16: 165–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pruvot E, Vesin JM, Schlaepfer J, Fromer M, Kappenberger M. Autonomic imbalance assessed by heart rate variability analysis in vasovagal syncope.PACE 1994;17: 2201–2206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenthal T, Birch M, Osikowska B, Sever PS. Changes in plasma noradrenaline concentration following sympathetic stimulation by gradual tilting.Cardiovasc Res 1978;12: 144–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Segal N, Dougherty R, Sackner MA. Effects of tilting on pulmonary capillary blood flow in normal man.J Appl Physiol 1973;35: 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mano T, Iwase S, Watanabe T, Saito M. Age-dependency of sympathetic nerve response to gravity in humans.The Physiologist 1991;34: S121-S124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Benditt DG, Remole S, Bailin S, Dunnigan A, Asso A, Milstein S. Tilt table testing for evaluation of neurally mediated (cardioneurogenic) syncope: rationale and proposed protocols.PACE 1991;14: 1528–1537.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Khurana RK. Orthostatic intolerance and orthostatic tachycardia: a heterogeneous disorder.Clin Autonom Res 1995;5: 12–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mader SL, Palmer RM, Rubenstein LZ. Effect of timing and number of baseline blood pressure determinations on postural blood pressure response.J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37: 444–446.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Novusis M.Discriminant Analysis. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fitzpatrick A, Sutton R. Tilting towards a diagnosis in recurrent unexplained syncope.Lancet 1989;i: 658–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Natale A, Akhtar M, Jazayeri Met al. Provocation of hypotension during head-up tilt testing in subjects with no history of syncope or presyncope.Circulation 1995;92: 54–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Montano N, Ruscona TG, Porta A, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Malliani A. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt.Circulation 1994;90: 1826–1831.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith JJ, Hughes CV, Ptacin MD, Barney JA, Tristani FE, Ebert TJ. The effect of age on hemodynamic response to graded postural stress in normal men.J Gerontol 1987;42: 406–411.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Matalon SV, Farhi LE. Cardiopulmonary readjustments in passive tilt.J Appl Physiol: Respirat Environ Exercise Physiol 1979;47(3): 503–507.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gauer OH, Thron HL. Postural changes in the circulation. In: Hamilton WF, Dow P, eds.Handbook of Physiology. Section 2. Circulation, Vol. III, Baltimore: Waverly Press, 1965; 2409–2437.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wieling W, Wesseling KH. Importance of reflexes in the circulatory adjustments to postural changes. In: Hainsworth R, Mark AL, eds.Cardiovascular Reflex Control in Health and Disease, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co. Ltd, 1993; 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fouad MF, Sitthisook S, Vanerio Get al. Sensitivity and specificity of the tilt table test in young patients with unexplained syncope.PACE 1993;16: 394–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wahbha MMAE, Morley CA, Al-Shamma YMH, Hainsworth R. Cardiovascular reflex responses in patients with unexplained syncope.Clin Sci 1989;77: 547–553.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Streeten DH, Anderson Jr GH. Delayed orthostatic intolerance.Arch Int Med 1992;152: 1066–1072.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Stevens PM. Cardiovascular dynamics during orthostasis and the influence of intravascular instrumentation.Am J Cardiol 1966;17: 211–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. ten Harkel ADJ, van Leishout JJ, van Leishout EJ, Wieling W. Assessment of cardiovascular reflexes: influence of posture and period of preceding rest.J Appl Physiol 1990;68: 147–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sprangers RLH, Veerman DP, Karemaker JM, Wieling W. Initial circulatory responses to changes in posture: influence of the angle and speed of tilt.Clin Physiol 1991;11: 211–220.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Murray RH, Bowers JA, Goltra ER. Comparison of footboard and saddle supports for orthostatic stress on a tilt table.J Appl Physiol 1966;21: 1409–1411.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kapoor WN, Smith MA, Miller NL. Upright tilt testing in evaluating syncope: a comprehensive literature review.Am J Med 1994;97: 78–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wallin BG, Sundolf G. Sympathetic outflow to muscles during vasovagal syncope.J Autonom Nerv Syst 1982;6: 287–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. ten Harkel ADJ, van Leishout JJ, Karemaker JM, Wieling W. Differences in circulatory control in normal subjects who faint and who do not faint during orthostatic stress.Clin Autonom Res 1993;3: 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khurana, R.K., Nicholas, E.M. Head-up tilt table test: how far and how long?. Clinical Autonomic Research 6, 335–341 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556304

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556304

Keywords

Navigation