Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of process variables, degree of ethoxylation and alcohol structure on relative ethoxylation rate constants

  • Surfactants & Detergents
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

Supercritical fluid chromatographic determinations of ethylene oxide distributions in ethoxylated alcohols with subsequent computer calculations of relative propagation to initiation ethoxylation rate constants for each ethoxylated oligomer have been carried out for normal octanol under varying reaction conditions. A number of other alcohols were also ethoxylated under essentially constant conditions. In the normal octanol studies, within an approximately fifteen-fold change in absolute ethoxylation rates due to variations in temperature, pressure, and potassium hydroxide catalyst concentration, the data indicate that such changes do not affect ethylene oxide distributions. Suggestions by earlier workers of changes in relative ethoxylation rate constants with the average degree of ethoxylation were verified. Chain length for normal alcohol feeds does not affect distributions in the C-8 to C-13 range, but branching at the carbon α to the hydroxyl carbon increases the relative propagation to initiation rate constants, and a secondary alcohol exhibits an even higher ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Cross, ed., “Nonionic Surfactants Chemical Analysis,” Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geissler, P. R.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 66:685 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Natta, G. and E. Mantica,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74:3152 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Farkas, L., J. Morgos, P. Sallay, I. Rusznak, B. Bartha and G. Veress,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 58:650 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, A.E., P.R. Geissler and L.D. Talley,67:123 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tischbirek, G.,3rd Proc. Intern. Congr. Surface Activity, Vol. 1, Cologne, 1960, p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patat, F., E. Cremer and O. Bobleter,J. Polymer Science 12:489 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patat, F., E. Cremer and O. Bobleter,Monatsch. Chem 83:322 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gee, G., W.C.E. Higginson and G.T. MerrallJ. Chem. Society 1345 (1959).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Geissler, P.R., Johnson, A.E. Effect of process variables, degree of ethoxylation and alcohol structure on relative ethoxylation rate constants. J Am Oil Chem Soc 67, 541–546 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540763

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540763

Key Words

Navigation