Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in fatty acid content and seed weight in some lauric acid richCuphea species

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

Significant genetic variation for lauric acid (12∶0) and capric acid (10∶0) composition and seed weight was measured within lauric acid-rich, self-pollinating germplasm accessions ofCuphea wrightii, C. tolucana, andC. lutea. Means and ranges of individual plant progenies for 12∶0 content ofC. wrightii accessions was 60.5±.63% (49.8±65.8%), 10∶0 content was 23.7±.54% (18.6±33.0%), and 1000-seed weight was 1.50±.03 g (1.20–2.47 g). Progenies of single plant selections carried to the S2 generation exhibited reduced variability within selections, but significant variation among selections for 12∶0, 10∶0 and 1000-seed weight. Variation among single plant selections ofC. tolucana was less than that ofC. wrightii and attributed to a restricted germplasm base. Means and ranges for 12∶0 content were 61.6±.47% (59.2–69.9%), 10∶0 was 22.3±.62% (11.7–25.3%), and 1000-seed weight was 1.40±.05 g (0.90–1.69 g).Cuphea lutea has a significantly different 12∶0−10∶0 profile than the other lauric acid-rich species. Means and ranges for 12∶0 were 36.8±.14% (33.7–40.8%), 10∶0 was 21.8±.08% (16.4–23.9%), 1000-seed weight was 2.26±.02 g (1.82–272 g). The 1000-seed weight was highly positively correlated with 8∶0, 10∶0, 18∶1 and 18∶2 contents and highly negatively correlated with 12∶0, 14∶0 and 16∶0 in bothC. wrightii andC. tolucana. No such relationship was found forC. lutea. A highly significant negative correlation was also measured for 12∶0 and 10∶0 contents inC. wrightii andC. tolucana.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arkcoll D.,Econ. Bot. 42:195 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arndt, S.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62:6 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson, A.E. and R. Kleiman,65:139 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Babayan, V.K.,58:49A (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Babayan, V.K.,Lipids 22:417 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bach, A.C. and V.K. Babayan,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 36:950 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson, A.E.,HortScience 19:352 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graham, S.A.,Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 28:139 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, R.W., F.R. Earle, I.A. Wolff and Q. Jones,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 41:279 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Graham, S.A., F. Hirsinger and G. Röbbelen,Am. J. Bot. 68:908 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolf, R.B., S.A. Graham and R. Kleiman,J. Oil Chem. Soc. 60:27 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graham, S.A. and R. Kleiman,62:81 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirsinger, F. and P.F. Knowles,Econ. Bot. 38:439 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hirsinger, F.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62:76 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, A.E., Dierig, D.A., Knapp, S.J. et al. Variation in fatty acid content and seed weight in some lauric acid richCuphea species. J Am Oil Chem Soc 67, 611–617 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540409

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540409

Key Words

Navigation