Skip to main content
Log in

Streptomycine et lysozyme

  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Résumé

Les microorganismes sensibles au lysozyme ne subissent pas l'agglutination par la streptomycine. Inversement, la streptomycine empêche la clarification des suspensions microbiennes par le lysozyme. Cet effet est attribuable à la prévention de la dissolution des noyaux.

Les mutants résistants à la streptomycine restent sensibles au lysozyme et se comportent, en présence de streptomycine plus lysozyme, comme les souches-mères.

Abstract

Lysozyme-sensitive microorganisms are not subject to streptomycin-agglutination. Conversely, streptomycin inhibits the clarification of bacterial suspensions by lysozyme. This effect is mainly due to a prevention of nuclear dissolution.

Streptomycin-resistant mutants remain lysozyme-sensitive and behave towards streptomycin plus lysozyme as do parent-cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. E. H. Boasson, J. Immunol.34, 281, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Caselli, Boll. Soc. ital. Biol. sperim.23, 1176, 1947.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. S. Cohen, J. Biol. Chem.168, 511, 1947.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Cutinelli etN. La Manna, Riv. Ist. sierot. ital.25, 1, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. A. Epstein etE. Chain, Brit. J. exp. Path.21, 339, 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Fleming, Proc. Roy. Soc. B.93, 306, 1922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Gros, M. Macheboeuf, P. Lacaille etB. Rybak, C. R. Acad. Sci.228, 720, 1949; Ann. Inst. Pasteur77, 246, 1949.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Hallauer, Zentralhl. f. Bakt.114, 519, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Linz, Ann. Inst. Pasteur76, 250, 1949.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Linz etE. Lecocq, C. R. Soc. Biol.144, 305, 1950.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Meyer etE. Hahnel, J. Biol. Chem.163, 723, 1946.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Meyer, J.W. Palmer, R. Thompson etD. Khorazo, J. Biol. Chem.113, 479 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Petronelli, Boll. Ist. sierot. Milan.29, 252, 1950.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Pirie, Brit. J. exp. Path.21, 125, 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Rybak etF. Gros, Experientia4, 396, 1948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Rybak, F. Grumbach etF. Gros, Ann. Inst. Pasteur77, 237, 1949.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Welsch, C. R. Soc. Biol.143, 1141, 1282, 1401, 1603, 1949;144, 432, 732, 981, 1142, 1950; Bull. Acad. Roy. Méd. Belg.15, 454, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Welsch, C. R. Soc. Biol.145, 778, 1951.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welsch, M. Streptomycine et lysozyme. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 18, 23–30 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538587

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538587

Navigation