Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the ganglioside distributions of fat tissues in various animals by two-dimensional thin layer chromatography

  • Published:
Lipids

Abstract

The ganglioside distributions of various fat tissues from human, rabbit, rat, mouse, chicken and frog were compared with pig adipose gangliosides by two-dimensional thin layers chromatography. It was found that there is a remarkable species variation in ganglioside distribution, especially in the composition and relative concentration of complex gangliosides. Differing from pig adipose tissues, those of human, rabbit, rat, mouse, chicken, but not frog, contained GM3 as a most abundant ganglioside. The data for human, rabbit and chicken indicated a simple distribution of only NeuActype gangliosides, while those for rat and mouse indicated a rather complicated pattern containing both NeuAc- and NeuGc-type gangliosides. The ganglioside pattern of the frog fat body differed markedly from those of mammalian fat tissues because of the presence of three different, unsual monosialosylgangliosides as major components. In other respects, a substantial amount of disialosylgangliosides was commonly found in all animal fat tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohashi, M., and T. Yamakawa, J. Biochem. 81:1675 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohashi, M., and T. Yamakawa, J. Biochem. (In press).

  3. Sweeley, C.C., and B. Walker, Anal. Chem. 36:1461 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu, R.K., and R.W. Ledeen, J. Lipid Res. 11:506 (1970).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Svennerholm, L., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 24:604 (1957).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lassaga, F.E., I.A. Lassaga, and R. Caputto, J. Lipid Res. 13:810 (1972).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ledeen, R., K. Salsman, and M. Cabrera, Biochemistry 7:2287 (1968).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Puro, K., P. Maury, and J.K. Huttunen, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 187:230 (1969).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Svennerholm, L., Acta Chem. Scand., 17:860 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwiterovich, P.O., H.R. Sloan, and D.S. Fredrickson, J. Lipid Res. 11:322 (1970).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamakawa, T., R. Irie, and M. Iwanaga, J. Biochem. 48:490 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamakawa, T., in “Lipoide, 16th Mosbach Colloquim,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1966, p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sweeley, C.C., and G. Dawson, in “Red Cell Membrane, Structure and Function,” Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1969, p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ohashi, M., and T. Yamakawa, J. Lipid Res. 14:698 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuatrecasas, P., Biochemistry 12:3547 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuatrecasas, P., Biochemistry 12:3558 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanfer, J.N., T.P. Carter, and H.M. Katzen, J. Biol. Chem. 251:7610 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pacuszka, T., J. Moss, and P.H. Fishman, J. Biol. Chem. 253:5103 (1978).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Ohashi, M. A comparison of the ganglioside distributions of fat tissues in various animals by two-dimensional thin layer chromatography. Lipids 14, 52–57 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02533566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02533566

Keywords

Navigation