Skip to main content
Log in

Sources of variation in moral judgment: Toward a model of real-life morality

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the extent to which the models of moral judgment advanced by Kohlberg (1984) and by Gilligan (1982, 1988) are able to account for real-life moral judgment, we investigated the relation of sex and type of moral dilemma to moral stage and moral orientation. Eighty young adult men and women made moral judgments about two hypothetical Kohlberg dilemmas, two real-life antisocial dilemmas, and two real-life prosocial dilemmas. We failed to find any sex differences in moral judgment. Moral stage and moral orientation varied across the three types of dilemma. Kohlberg's dilemmas pulled for justice-oriented Stage 4 moral judgments, real-life prosocial dilemmas pulled for care-oriented Stage 3 moral judgments, and real-life antisocial dilemmas pulled for justice-oriented Stage 2 moral judgments. The content of moral judgments was related to their structure. There was a positive relation between stage of moral judgment on Kohlberg dilemmas and on real-life dilemmas. The implications of these findings for a new, more interactional, model of real-life moral judgment are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armon, C. (1995). Moral judgment and self-reported moral events in adulthood.Journal of Adult Development, 1, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartek, S., Krebs, D. L., & Taylor, M. (1993). Coping, defending, and the relations between moral judgment and moral behavior in prostitutes and other female juvenile delinquents.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale, J. I. M., & Krebs, D. L. (1992). Situational variation in moral judgment: In a stage or on a stage?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale, J. I. M., & Krebs, D. L. (1995). Variations in moral judgment as a function of type of dilemma and moral choice.Journal of Personality, 63, 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987).The measurement of moral judgment. (Vol. 1). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, K., & Krebs, D. L. (1990). From the scene to the crime: The effect of alcohol and social context on moral judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 242–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donenberg, G., & Hoffman, L. (1988). Gender differences in moral development.Sex Roles, 18, 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (1986).Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991).Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M., & Lowery, C. (1986) Gender differences in moral reasoning: A comparison of the use of justice and care orientations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 777–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C., Clark, P. M., Joseph, J. A., Green, J. L., Goodrick, T. S., & Makowski, D. G. (1986). Relations between moral judgment, moral courage and field independence.Child Development, 57, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1988). Adolescent development reconsidered. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, & J. M. Taylor (Eds.),Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women's thinking to psychological theory and education (pp. vii-xxxix). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., & Belenky, M. F. (1980). A naturalistic study of abortion decisions. In R. L. Selman & R. Yando (Eds.),New directions for child development: Clinical-developmental psychology (no. 7, pp. 69–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, J., & Scharf, P. (1980).Toward a just correctional system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Emler, N. (1995). Personality and moral development. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.),Moral Development: An introduction (pp. 209–227). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984).Essays on moral development (Vol. 2): The psychology of moral development. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Candec, D. (1984). The relation of moral judgment to moral action.

  • Kohlberg, L. (Ed.),Essays on moral development, Vol. II: The Psychology of moral development (pp. 498–581). San Fran: Harper & Row.

  • Krebs, D. L., & Denton, K. (in press). On the relation between moral judgment and moral behavior. In D. Garz. F. Oser, & W. Althof (Eds.),The context of morality. Frankfurt, Germany: M. Suhrlcamp.

  • Krebs, D. L., Denton, K., Vermeulen, S. C., Carpendale, J. I., & Bush, A. (1991). The structural flexibility of moral judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1012–1023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. L., Denton, K., & Wark, G. (1997). The forms and functions of real-life moral decision-making.Journal of Moral Education, 20, 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. L., & Miller, D. (1985). Altruism and aggression. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 1–71). Random House.

  • Krebs, D. L., Vermeulen, S. C., Carpendale, J. I., & Denton K. (1991). Structural and situational influences on moral judgment: The interaction between stage and dilemma. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.),Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research, and application (pp. 139–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erllbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. L., Vermeulen, S. C., Denton, K. L., & Carpendale, J. I. (1994). Gender and perspective differences in moral judgment and moral orientation.Journal of Moral Education, 23, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, P. G., & Krebs, D. L. (1997).Judging yourself as you judge others: Perspective-taking, moral development, and exculpation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Levine, C. G. (1979). Stage acquisition and stage use: An appraisal of stage displacement explanations of variation in moral reasoning.Human Development, 22, 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality.Harvard Educational Review, 53, 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, G. (1984). Two moralities? A critical dimension of an ethic of care and responsibility versus an ethic of rights and justice. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.),Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 348–361). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M., Golding, G., Hunter, W., & Sampson, R. (1988). Sex differences in adult moral orientations.Journal of Personality, 56, 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. W., Golding, G., & Kerig, P. (1987). Lifespan differences in adult thinking about hypothetical and personal moral issues: Reflection or regression?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10(3), 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. F. (1983). Morality. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markam (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 556–629). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M., Hanley, D., & Albert, M. (1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning.Sex Roles, 15, 645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzstein, H. D. (1994). The relation between moral judgment and behavior: A social-cognitive and decision-making analysis.Human Development, 37, 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J. (1982). The sequentiality of Kohlberg's stages of moral development.Child Development, 53, 1330–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J., de Vries, B., & Trevethan, S. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations.Child Development, 58, 842–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wark, G. R., & Krebs, D. L. (1996). Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgment.Developmental Psychology, 32, 220–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wark, G.R., Krebs, D.L. Sources of variation in moral judgment: Toward a model of real-life morality. J Adult Dev 4, 163–178 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02510595

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02510595

Key Words

Navigation