Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Institutional factors in time to the doctorate

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to delineate departmental differences in the length of time that doctoral students take to receive their degrees and the institutional characteristics linked with it. Variables describing graduate departments in three disciplines (chemistry, English, and psychology) and their parent universities were obtained from available records. In analyses of departments in each discipline, a relatively small set of institutional variables correlated with average time to the doctorate for the department, after controlling for characteristics of students in the department, and these relationships differed from discipline to discipline. The clearest and most extensive findings emerged for psychology: the institutional variables identified primarily concerned faculty accessibility (student/faculty ratio and department size)—a longer time to the doctorate for departments with many students per faculty member or many students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association (1973).Graduate Study in Psychology for 1974–5. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (1977).Graduate Study in Psychology for 1978–1979. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (1981).Graduate Study in Psychology: 1982–1983. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (1986).Graduate Study in Psychology and Associated Fields—1986. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1962). An empirical characterization of higher educational institutions.Journal of Educational Psychology 53: 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1968). Undergraduate achievement and institutional “excellence”.Science 161: 661–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., and Henson, J. W. (1977). New measures of college selectivity.Research in Higher Education 6: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, L. L. (1990). Disciplines and doctorates: The relationships between program characteristics and the duration of doctoral study.Research in Higher Education 31: 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. (1960).Graduate Education in the United State. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, H. M., and Ferber, M. A. (1983). Men and women graduate students—Who succeeds and why?Journal of Higher Education 54: 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., and Rudenstine, N. L. (1992).In Pursuit of the Doctorate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breneman, D. W. (1975).Graduate School Adjustments to the “New Depression” in Higher Education (Technical Report 3). Washington, DC: National Board on Graduate Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyles, S. G. (1984).Fall Enrollment in Colleges and Universities, 1992. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education (1976).A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education (rev ed.). Berkeley, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartter, A. M. (1966).An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1970).The College Environment Revisited: Current Descriptions and a Comparison of Three Methods of Assessment (CEEB Research and Development Report 70-71; ETS Research Report 70-44). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. G. (1979). Pricing policy and the college choice process.Research in Higher Education 10: 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. J., Hartnett, R. T., and Baird, L. L. (1976).Assessing Dimensions of Quality in Doctoral Education: A Technical Report of a National Study in Three Fields. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, L., Trismen, D., and Miller, R. (eds.) (1977).Graduate Record Examinations Technical Manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, S. L., and Thurgood, D. H. (1989).Summary Report 1987—Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service (1988).A Summary of Data Collected from Graduate Record Examinations Test Takers During 1986–1987 (Data Summary Report 12). Princeton, NJ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. D. (1974).Escape from the Doll’s House—Women in Graduate and Professional School Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, C. H. (1986). Ph.D. recipients—Where do they go to college?.Change 18 (6): 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girves, J. E., and Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress.Journal of Higher Education 59: 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Record Examinations Board and Council of Graduate Schools in the United States (1972).Graduate Programs and Admissions Manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Record Examinations Board and Council of Graduate Schools in the State (1975).Graduate Programs and Admissions Manual—1975–76. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Record Examinations Board and Council of Graduate Schools in the United States (1979).Graduate Programs and Admissions Manual—1979–1981. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Record Examinations Board and Council of Graduate Schools in the United States (1983).Directory of Graduate Programs: 1984 & 1985. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Record Examinations Board and Council of Graduate Schools in the United States (1987).Directory of Graduate Programs: 1988 & 1989. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, R. T. (1981). Sex differences in the environments of graduate students and faculty.Research in Higher Education 14: 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, R. J., and Willingham, W. W. (1980). The criterion problem: What measure of success in graduate education?Applied Psychological Measurement 4: 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, B. J. (1987). A report on the 1986 survey of English doctoral programs in writing and literature. In A. Lunsford, H. Moglen, and J. S. Slavin (eds.),Future of Doctoral Studies in English, pp. 121–176. New York: Modern Language Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, B. J., and Young, A. (1986). Report on the 1983–84 survey of the English sample.ADE Bulletin 84: 40–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., and Coggeshall, P. E. (eds.) (1982).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korb, R., Schantz, N., and Zimbler, L. (1989).Student Financing of Graduate and Professional Education—A Report of the 1987 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, J. D. (1968). Attrition among Ph.D. candidates: An analysis of a cohort of recent Woodrow Wilson Fellows.Journal of Human Resources 3: 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (1988).E. D. TABS: Postsecondary Fall Enrollment, 1986. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1978).Expenditures for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges—Fiscal Year 1977 (NSF 78-311). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1982).Academic Science R&D Funds—Fiscal Year 1980 (NSF 82-300). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1985).Academic Science/Engineering: R&D Funds—Fiscal Year 1983 (NSF 85-308). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (1989).Academic Science/Engineering: R&D Funds—Fiscal Year 1987 (NSF 89-311). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student-facully informal contact and college outcomes.Review of Educational Research 50: 545–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, A. J. (1978).Fall Enrollment in Higher Education, 1978. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepin, A. J. (1979).Fall Enrollment in Higher Education, 1978. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pion, G. M., Bramblett, J. P., Jr., and Wicherski, M. (1986).Graduate Departments of Psychology, 1985–86: Report of the Annual APA/COGDOP Department Survey. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pion, G. M., Bramblett, J. P., Jr., and Wicherski, M. (1987).Graduate Departments of Psychology, 1986–87: Report of the Annual APA/COGDOP Departmental Survey. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solmon, L. C. (1976).Male and Female Graduate Students—The Question of Equal Opportunity. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, L. J. (1993).Institutional Factors in Time to the Doctorate. ETS Research Report 93–16. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A., Gottlieb, D., and Pease, J. (1964).Attrition of Graduate Students at the Ph. D. Level in the Traditional Arts and Sciences (Publication No. 8). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Office of Research Development and the Graduate School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H., Coyle, S., and Bae, Y. (1990).On Time to the Doctorate—A Study of the Increased Time to Complete Doctorates in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, G. H. (1971).Fall Enrollment in Higher Education: 1970, Supplementary Information, Institutional Data. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, G. H. (1975).Fall Enrollment in Higher Education, 1974. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing, Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, W. W. (1974). Predicting success in graduate education.Science 183: 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. M. (1965).Of Time and the Doctorate—Report of an Inquiry into the Duration of Doctoral Study (SREB Research Monograph 9). Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Testing Service, 08541, Princeton, NJ

    Lawrence J. Stricker

Authors
  1. Lawrence J. Stricker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stricker, L.J. Institutional factors in time to the doctorate. Res High Educ 35, 569–587 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02497088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02497088

Keywords

Search

Navigation