Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in the environments of graduate students and faculty

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers some important psychological aspects of the academic experience for male and female graduate faculty members and students. Drawing on data collected in a recent national study of doctoral program quality, information pertaining to the graduate department's environment for learning, the extent of faculty members' concern for students, graduate student assistantship experiences, and faculty members' satisfactions and views about various departmental practices and policies are examined. Gender differences in both student and faculty member perceptions of their environments were found to be generally slight and to vary by discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N. E. Women students. In J. Katz and R. Hartnett (Eds.),Scholars in the Making: the Development of Graduate and Professional Students. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H. S.The woman doctorate in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. E., & Astin, H. A. Sex differences in the academic reward system.Science 1975,188 796–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J.Academic women. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A.Women, men, and the doctorate. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. J.The assessment of quality in Ph.D. programs: a preliminary report on judgments by graduate deans. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. J., Hartnett, R. T., & Baird, L. L.Assessing dimensions of quality in doctoral education. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R.Fair science: Women in the scientific community. New York: Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, R. B. Women faculty: Development, promotion, and pay. Princeton, N.J.:Findings, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1979.

  • Gappa, J. M., & Uehling, B. S.Women in academe: steps to greater equality. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P. Are women prejudiced against men?Trans-Action 1968,5 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, E. I., & Holmstrom, R. W. The plight of the women doctoral student.American Educational Research Journal 1974,11 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornig, L.Climbing the academic ladder: doctoral women scientists in academe. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G., Rosenfeld, R., & Spilerman, S. Geographic constraints on women's careers in academia.Science 1979,205 1125–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. S., & Calderwood, A.Academic women on the move. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, C. S.Female and male. Dubuque, Iowa: Brown, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartnett, R.T. Sex differences in the environments of graduate students and faculty. Res High Educ 14, 211–227 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983390

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983390

Keywords

Navigation