Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of the underground parts ofGentiana species by HPLC with diode-array and mass spectrometric detection

  • Originals
  • Column Liquid Chromatography
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of this work was to compare the chemical composition of the underground parts (roots and rhizomes) ofGentiana cruciata L.,Gentiana pneumonanthe L., andGentiana asclepiadea L.— the three gentians native to Hungary—with that of the widely used stomachicGentiana lutea L., to determine which of the three Hungarian species could be used as a substitute forGentiana lutea in pharmaceutical preparations. The four gentians were compared by means of RPHPLC with diode-array detection (DAD) and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometric detection (ESI-MSD). The quantities of the lead compounds, the secoiridoid-glycosides, in 220 samples of the underground parts of gentians originating from several locations in Hungary, were determined by a more economical RPHPLC-DAD method. The occurrence of the characteristic compounds investigated—bitter principles and xanthones—in the underground parts of the speciesGentiana asclepiadea L. suggest it might be a potential replacement forGentiana lutea L. in pharmaceutical products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hegnauer, R., Ed.,Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen, Birkhäuser, Basel,1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hansel, R.; Rimpler, H.; Keller, K.; Schneider, G.,Hagers Handbuch, der Pharmazeutischen Praxis, Springer, Berlin,1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kondo, Y.; Takano, F.; Hojo, H.Planta Med. 1994,60, 414–416.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hostettmann, K.; Wagner, H.Phytochemistry 1977,16, 821–829.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Niessen, W.M.A.; van der Greef, J.Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Principles and Applications, Marcel Dekker, New York,1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whitehouse, R.C.; Dreyer, R.N.; Yamashita, M.; Fenn, J.B.Anal. Chem. 1985,57, 675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolfender, J.-L.; Rodriguez, S.; Hostettmann, K.Chromatographia 2001,54, 274–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chevalley, I.; Marston, A.; Hostettmann K.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,794, 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sticher, O.; Meier, B.Planta Med. 1980,40, 55–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Takino, Y.; Koshioka, M.; Kawaguchi, M.; Miyahara, T.; Tanizawa, H.; Ishii, Y.; Higashino, M.; Hayashi, T.Planta Med. 1980,38, 344–350.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Keller, F.J. Plant Phys. 1986,122, 473–476.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schaufelberger, D.; Hostettmann, K.J. Chromatogr. 1985,346, 396–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szucs, Z., Dános, B. & Nyiredy, S. Comparative analysis of the underground parts ofGentiana species by HPLC with diode-array and mass spectrometric detection. Chromatographia 56, S19–S23 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02494108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02494108

Key Words

Navigation