Skip to main content
Log in

An embryological contribution to systematics of the Chrysobalanaceae I. Tribe Chrysobalaneae

  • Published:
The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present the first results concerning the embryology of Chrysobalanaceae. In it, we document developmental features of anthers, ovules, seeds and gametophytes ofChrysobalanus andLicania (tribe Chrysobalaneae). Based on our results with these two genera, Chrysobalanaceae have a distinctive combination of embryological features. They differ from Rosaceae (in which Chrysobalanaceae were once placed as a tribe or subfamily) in having a tenuinucellate ovule, a small nucellus with the tissue soon disintegrating, and an endothelium. None of our embryological of Rosales, or with other groups such as Fabaceae or Myrtales, which have also been suggested as relatives. We propose, based upon the evidence from embryology, vegetative features, and reproductive morphology, that Chrysobalanaceae might best be placed in the order Theales, probably near the family Theaceae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bala-Bawa, S. 1970. Theaceae.In: B.R. Seshachar, ed., Proceedings of the Symposium on Comparative Embryology of Angiosperms, held in 1967 in Dehli. Bull. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.41: 75–77.

  • Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The Seeds of Dicotyledons. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nord. J. Bot.3: 119–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R. and R.F. Thorne. 1984. The order Myrtales: circumscription, variation, and relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: (in press).

  • Davis, G.L. 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickison, W.C. 1981. The evolutionary relationships of the Leguminosae.In: R.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven, ed., Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 1, p. 35–54. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dnyansagar, V.R. 1970. Leguminosae.In: B.R. Seshachar, ed., Proceedings of the Symposium on Comparative Embryology of angiosperms, held in 1967 in Dehli. Bull. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.41: 93–103.

  • Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. Angiosperms. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, C. 1888. Über die Gattung der Chrysobalanaceen. Verh. Zool-Bot. Ges. Wien38: 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller, M.A. 1961. Die Phylogenetische Stellung vonSuriana maritima L. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.81: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H. 1923. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Linaceae (DC. 1819). Dumort. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.39: 1–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauman, L. 1951. Contribution a l'etude des Chrysobalanoides africaines Bull. Jard. Bot. Etat21: 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1973. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Vol. 6. Birkhäser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, H.O. 1915. Über den Bau des Gynöceums beiParinarium. Ark. Bot.14: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalee, C.R. andL. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of Dicotyledons. 2 vols. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayana, L.L. 1975. A contribution to the floral anatomy and embryology of Ochnaceae. J. Jap. Bot.50: 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netolitzky, F. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermen Samen. Linsbauer Handb. Pfl. Anat. vol. 10. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G.T. 1972. Chrysobalanaceae. Flora Neotropica Monogr. No. 9. Hafner Publs. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,D.J. Rogers andF. White. 1969. A taximetric study of an angiosperm family: generic delimitation in the Chrysobalanaceae. New Phytol.68: 1203–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M. 1956. Floral morphology and embryology ofTrapa bispinosa, with a discussion on the systematic position of the genus. Phytomorphology6: 312–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R. 1982. Descriptors used to indicate abundance and frequency in ecology and systematics. Taxon31: 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andM.D. Turner. 1977. Contrad 70, an effective softener of herbarium material for anatomical study. Taxon26: 551–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A.L. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev.46: 225–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R.F. 1983. Proposed new realignments in angiosperms. Nord. J. Bot.3: 85–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobe, H. andP.H. Raven. 1983a. An embryological analysis of the Myrtales: its definition and characteristics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.70: 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • . 1983b. The embryology ofAxinandra zeylanica (Crypteroniaceae) and the relationships of the genus. Bot. Gaz.144: 426–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, J.G. 1970. The Structure and Utilization of Oil Seeds. Chapman & Hall Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J.E. 1902. A morphological study of flower and embryo ofSpiraea. Bot. Gaz.33: 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, R. 1933. Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik, 4 ed. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tobe, H., Raven, P.H. An embryological contribution to systematics of the Chrysobalanaceae I. Tribe Chrysobalaneae. Bot Mag Tokyo 97, 397–411 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488671

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488671

Key words

Navigation