Skip to main content
Log in

Theory of biological similarities, nondimensional parameters and invariant numbers

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In previous papers (1955–1957) a theory of biological similarity was established, assuming that the limits are the mechanical and the electrodynamical similarity criteria. The range of this theory lies between the coefficient of the time exponent (γ) for mechanical (0.5γ) and electrodynamical (1.0γ) similarities, being the mode 0.93γ. Moreover, for certain functions this restricted theoretical range should be extended to the hydrodynamical similarity criterion (2γ), so that the dimensionless numbers commonly used in Physics (Reynolds, Froude, Weber, etc.) can be included within the total range (0.5–2γ) of biological similarities. From dimensional analysis of physiological, functions it was possible to obtain, by means of dimensional and solution matrices, a group of “nondimensional numbers” by applying Buckingham's Pi-theorem. Nevertheless, only if a single similarity criterion was applied, the residual weight exponent was exactly zero; in all other instances the weight exponent was not zero, due to the existence of a range for biological similarities and to the statistical meaning of exponent (b) of the allometric equations. From the similarity criteria “invariant numbers” can be obtained, by means of which it is possible to establish correlations between numerous morphological and physiological characteristics of a particular system (circulation, respiration, metabolism, etc.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Bertalanffy, L. von. 1951.Theoretische Biologie. Bd. II.Stoffwechsel und Wachstum. Bern: Francke Verlag, 240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G. 1960.Hydrodynamics. A study in Logic, Fact and Similitude. Second Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. W. 1922.Dimensional Analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G. 1638. (cited in Thompson, D'Arcy W., 1952.),On Growth and Form. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, B. and E. Guerra. 1955. “Biological similarities.”Acta physiol. latinoamer.,5, 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. “Theory of biological similarity applied to some data of Comparative Physiology.”Acta physiol. latinoamer.,7, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoesslin, H. von. 1888. “Über die Ursache der scheinbaren Abhängigkeit des Umsatzes von der Grösse der Körperoberfläche”Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol., 329–379.

  • Hoesslin, H. von. 1927. “Über die Umstände die die Höhe des Grundumsatzes bestimmen.”Z. f. Biol.,86, 569–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsen, D. C. 1960.Units, Dimensions, and Dimensionless Numbers New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, M. 1961.The Fire of Life An Introduction to Animal Energetics. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R. and G. Teissier. 1927. “Théorie de la similitude biologique.”Ann. de Physiol.,3, 212–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhaar, H. L. 1951.Dimensional Analysis and the, Theory of Models. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. 1735.Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Cantabrigiae, Lib. Sec., Sec. VII., Propositio 32, 294.

  • Rashevsky, N. 1960.Mathematical Biophysics. Third Edition (Vol.I andII). New York: Dover.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sedov, L. I. 1959.Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechnaics (translated from the Russian). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, W. R. 1961. “Dimensional analysis in mathematical Biology: I. General discussion.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,23, 355–376.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1962a. “Similarity and dimensional methods in Biology.”Science,137, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1962b. “Dimensional analysis in mathematical Biology: II.”,Bull. Math. Biophysics,24, 81–108.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1963. “Similarity Analysis of Physiological Systems.”Persp. Biol. Med.,6, 291–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. W. 1952.On Growth and Form. Second Edition, reprinted (Vol.I andII). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Günther, B., de la Barra, B.L. Theory of biological similarities, nondimensional parameters and invariant numbers. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 28, 91–102 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476392

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02476392

Keywords

Navigation