Abstract
Gradual changes in function of proteins in response to single changes in primary structure are often observed to occur and are a necessary condition for evolution by variation and natural selection at the protein level. A probabilistic (entropy theory_ analysis of the effect of changes in primary structure on three-dimensional shape and function shows that such gradualism is based on the presence of a control system in the molecule involving a definite general form of structure-function degeneracy. The assumptions of the analysis are that primary structure determines tertiary structure (or a thermal distribution of tertiary configurations and allosteric forms), tertiary structure determines function (characterized by rate and other parameters), and that certain features of tertiary structure may be specialized for particular functions. The main conclusion is that embodied in the molecule is a subsystem which serves as a buffer, absorbing mutation or other forms of genetic variation and expressing these as graceful variations in features of the shape critical for function. This buffer system may be realized by numerical redundancy of amino acids or other mechanisms which increase the redundancy of weak interactions responsible for folding, utilization of amino acids having a greater number of analogs with redundant features, or local and global structural formats which allow for more effective utilization of redundancy. The mutation-absorption model has implications for the interpretation of structure-function relations in biology, the topology of the adaptive landscape, the interpretation of isoenzymes and allozymes, the relationship between selection and neutralism in evolution, and the relation between the complexity of and energy required by biological systems and the effectiveness of evolutionary optimization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Conrad, M. 1972a. “Information Processing in Molecular Systems.”Currents in Modern Biology (nowBioSystems),5, 1–14.
—. 1972b. “Statistical and Hierarchical Aspects of Biological Organization.” InTowards a Theoretical Biology, Ed. Waddington, C. H.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
— 1977a. “Functional Significance of Biological Variability.”Bull. Math. Biol.,39, 139–156.
— 1977b. “Evolutionary Adaptability of Biological Macromolecules.”J. Molec. Evolution.,10, 87–91.
— 1977c. “Evolution of the Adaptive Landscape.” To appear inTheoretical Approaches to Complex Systems, Eds. R. Heim and G. Palm. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
King, J. L. and T. H. Jukes. 1969. “Non-Darwinian Evolution.”Science,164, 788–798.
Maynard Smith, J. 1970. “Natural Selection and the Concept of a Protein Space.”Nature,225, 563–564.
Perutz, M. F. 1962.Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company.
Rashevsky, N. 1960.Mathematical Biophysics, 3rd Ed. 2. vols. New York: Dover.
Roitt, I. 1974.Essential Immunology, 2nd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Rosen, R. 1973a. “On the Relation Between Structural and Functional Descriptions of Biological Systems.” InThe Physical Principles of Neuronal and Organismic Behavior, Eds. M. Conrad and M. Magar, London: Gordon and Breach.
— 1973b. Discussion p. 232. InThe Physical Principles of Neuronal and Organismic Behavior, Eds. M. Conrad and M. Magar. London: Gordon and Breach.
Rossman, M. G., A. Liljas, C. Branden and L. J. Banaszak. 1975. “Evolutionary and Structural Relationships among Dehydrogenases.” InThe Enzymes, 3rd ed. vol. 11, Ed. P. D. Boyer, New York: Academic Press.
Shannon, C. and W. Weaver. 1949.Mathematical Theory of Communication Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Thompson, D'Arcy Wentworth. 1917.On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wills, C. 1976. “Production of Yeast Alcohol Dehydrogenase Isoenzymes by Selection.”Nature,261, 26–29.
Woodward, P. M. 1973.Probability and Information Theory with Applications to Radar. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conrad, M. Mutation-absorption model of the enzyme. Bltn Mathcal Biology 41, 387–405 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460819
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460819