Skip to main content
Log in

Mutation-absorption model of the enzyme

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gradual changes in function of proteins in response to single changes in primary structure are often observed to occur and are a necessary condition for evolution by variation and natural selection at the protein level. A probabilistic (entropy theory_ analysis of the effect of changes in primary structure on three-dimensional shape and function shows that such gradualism is based on the presence of a control system in the molecule involving a definite general form of structure-function degeneracy. The assumptions of the analysis are that primary structure determines tertiary structure (or a thermal distribution of tertiary configurations and allosteric forms), tertiary structure determines function (characterized by rate and other parameters), and that certain features of tertiary structure may be specialized for particular functions. The main conclusion is that embodied in the molecule is a subsystem which serves as a buffer, absorbing mutation or other forms of genetic variation and expressing these as graceful variations in features of the shape critical for function. This buffer system may be realized by numerical redundancy of amino acids or other mechanisms which increase the redundancy of weak interactions responsible for folding, utilization of amino acids having a greater number of analogs with redundant features, or local and global structural formats which allow for more effective utilization of redundancy. The mutation-absorption model has implications for the interpretation of structure-function relations in biology, the topology of the adaptive landscape, the interpretation of isoenzymes and allozymes, the relationship between selection and neutralism in evolution, and the relation between the complexity of and energy required by biological systems and the effectiveness of evolutionary optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Conrad, M. 1972a. “Information Processing in Molecular Systems.”Currents in Modern Biology (nowBioSystems),5, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1972b. “Statistical and Hierarchical Aspects of Biological Organization.” InTowards a Theoretical Biology, Ed. Waddington, C. H.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1977a. “Functional Significance of Biological Variability.”Bull. Math. Biol.,39, 139–156.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1977b. “Evolutionary Adaptability of Biological Macromolecules.”J. Molec. Evolution.,10, 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1977c. “Evolution of the Adaptive Landscape.” To appear inTheoretical Approaches to Complex Systems, Eds. R. Heim and G. Palm. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. L. and T. H. Jukes. 1969. “Non-Darwinian Evolution.”Science,164, 788–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1970. “Natural Selection and the Concept of a Protein Space.”Nature,225, 563–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perutz, M. F. 1962.Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashevsky, N. 1960.Mathematical Biophysics, 3rd Ed. 2. vols. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitt, I. 1974.Essential Immunology, 2nd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. 1973a. “On the Relation Between Structural and Functional Descriptions of Biological Systems.” InThe Physical Principles of Neuronal and Organismic Behavior, Eds. M. Conrad and M. Magar, London: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1973b. Discussion p. 232. InThe Physical Principles of Neuronal and Organismic Behavior, Eds. M. Conrad and M. Magar. London: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, M. G., A. Liljas, C. Branden and L. J. Banaszak. 1975. “Evolutionary and Structural Relationships among Dehydrogenases.” InThe Enzymes, 3rd ed. vol. 11, Ed. P. D. Boyer, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. and W. Weaver. 1949.Mathematical Theory of Communication Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D'Arcy Wentworth. 1917.On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, C. 1976. “Production of Yeast Alcohol Dehydrogenase Isoenzymes by Selection.”Nature,261, 26–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, P. M. 1973.Probability and Information Theory with Applications to Radar. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conrad, M. Mutation-absorption model of the enzyme. Bltn Mathcal Biology 41, 387–405 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460819

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460819

Keywords

Navigation