Skip to main content
Log in

Time dependencies of Bradford distributions: Structures of journal output in 20th-century logic and 19th-century mathematics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time dependencies of Bradford distributions are investigated for 19th-century mathematics and for 20th-century logic. To facilitate comparisons, for the representation of empirical Bradford distributions “Pareto's law” and Lorenz diagrams are used. It is shown that the character of a Bradford distribution (including the “core zone” and the “Groos droop”) depends on the stage in the development of a scientific field and that it varies with the time-span considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. S. Naranan, Bradford's law of bibliography of science: an interpretation,Nature, 227 (1990) 631–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Naranan, “Power law” version of Bradford's law: statistical tests and methods of estimation,Scientometrics, 17 (1989) 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. For an overview of similar indicators see,L. Egghe, R. Rousseau,Introduction to Informetrics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Q. L. Burrell, The Bradford distribution and the Gini index,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Ijiri, H. A. Simon, Interpretations of departures from the Pareto curve firm-size distributions,Journal of Political Economy, 82 (1974) 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Ouliý-Vukoviy, Journal productivity distribution: Quantitative study of dynamic behavior,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (1992) 412–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Oluiý-Vukoviý, Impact of productivity increase on the distribution patterns of journals,Scientometrics, 17 (1989) 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. R. Coleman, Disciplinary variables that affect the shape of Bradford's bibliograph,Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 59–81. The results of Oluiý-Vukoviý and Coleman cannot be compared directly, however, because the former considered the output of authors defined by nationality whereas the latter considered scientific areas without such limitations.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. H. Müller (Ed.), Ω-Bibliography of Mathematical Logic, Vols. 1–6, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Wagner-Döbler, J. Berg,Mathematische Logik von 1847 bis zur Gegenwart, Eine bibliometrische Untersuchung, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Chen, F. F. Leimkuhler, Bradford's law: an index approach,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Contrary toK. C. Garg, P. Sharma, L. Sharma, Bradford's law in relation to the evolution of a field, A case study of solar power research,Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Wagner-Döbler, J. Berg, Nineteenth-century mathematics in the mirror of its literature, A quantitative approach,Historia Mathematica, 23 (1996) 288–318. Also the two other published indexes of theCatalogue (Physics, Mechanics) are currently prepared.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. See Ref. 1 andKarmeshu, N. C. Lind, V. Cano, Rationales for Bradford's law,Scientometrics, 6 (1984) 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. F. F. Leimkuhler, The Bradford distribution,Journal of Documentation, 23 (1967) 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf.S. R. Coleman, (Ref. 8). Apart from that,Coleman found no correlation between the number of years covered by bibliographies (of different subjects) and the form of the Bradford graph. This is contra-intuitive and contradicts the empirical results reported here and elsewhere. In addition, Coleman's Bradford graphs do not render standardized comparisons.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Goffman, K. S. Warren,Scientific Information Systems and the Principle of Selectivity, Praeger, New York 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  18. With the theorem of equation (12) inBurrell (Ref. 4,, p. 189) it is possible to compute the Gini index from an empirical distribution of the Pareto form. However, the calculation uses the average number of articles per journal; Table 1 shows, however, that the same average can lead to quite different Pareto distributions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Berg, R. Wagner-Döbler, A multidimensional analysis of scientific dynamics, Part 1, Case studies of mathematical logic in the 20th century,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Egghe, Application of the theory of Bradford's law to the calculation of Leimkuhler's law and to the completion of bibliographies,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (1990) 469–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, Reflections on a deflection: A note on different causes of the Groos droop,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Eto, Rising tail in Bradford distributions: its interpretation and application,Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cf.Wagner-Döbler, Two components of a causal explanation of Bradford's law,Journal of Information Science, 22 (1996) 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner-Döbler, R. Time dependencies of Bradford distributions: Structures of journal output in 20th-century logic and 19th-century mathematics. Scientometrics 39, 231–252 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458528

Keywords

Navigation