Abstract
Time dependencies of Bradford distributions are investigated for 19th-century mathematics and for 20th-century logic. To facilitate comparisons, for the representation of empirical Bradford distributions “Pareto's law” and Lorenz diagrams are used. It is shown that the character of a Bradford distribution (including the “core zone” and the “Groos droop”) depends on the stage in the development of a scientific field and that it varies with the time-span considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes and references
S. Naranan, Bradford's law of bibliography of science: an interpretation,Nature, 227 (1990) 631–632.
S. Naranan, “Power law” version of Bradford's law: statistical tests and methods of estimation,Scientometrics, 17 (1989) 211–226.
For an overview of similar indicators see,L. Egghe, R. Rousseau,Introduction to Informetrics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.
Q. L. Burrell, The Bradford distribution and the Gini index,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 181–194.
Y. Ijiri, H. A. Simon, Interpretations of departures from the Pareto curve firm-size distributions,Journal of Political Economy, 82 (1974) 315–331.
V. Ouliý-Vukoviy, Journal productivity distribution: Quantitative study of dynamic behavior,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (1992) 412–421.
V. Oluiý-Vukoviý, Impact of productivity increase on the distribution patterns of journals,Scientometrics, 17 (1989) 97–109.
S. R. Coleman, Disciplinary variables that affect the shape of Bradford's bibliograph,Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 59–81. The results of Oluiý-Vukoviý and Coleman cannot be compared directly, however, because the former considered the output of authors defined by nationality whereas the latter considered scientific areas without such limitations.
G. H. Müller (Ed.), Ω-Bibliography of Mathematical Logic, Vols. 1–6, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1987.
R. Wagner-Döbler, J. Berg,Mathematische Logik von 1847 bis zur Gegenwart, Eine bibliometrische Untersuchung, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York 1993.
Y. Chen, F. F. Leimkuhler, Bradford's law: an index approach,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 183–198.
Contrary toK. C. Garg, P. Sharma, L. Sharma, Bradford's law in relation to the evolution of a field, A case study of solar power research,Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 145–156.
R. Wagner-Döbler, J. Berg, Nineteenth-century mathematics in the mirror of its literature, A quantitative approach,Historia Mathematica, 23 (1996) 288–318. Also the two other published indexes of theCatalogue (Physics, Mechanics) are currently prepared.
See Ref. 1 andKarmeshu, N. C. Lind, V. Cano, Rationales for Bradford's law,Scientometrics, 6 (1984) 233–241.
F. F. Leimkuhler, The Bradford distribution,Journal of Documentation, 23 (1967) 197–207.
Cf.S. R. Coleman, (Ref. 8). Apart from that,Coleman found no correlation between the number of years covered by bibliographies (of different subjects) and the form of the Bradford graph. This is contra-intuitive and contradicts the empirical results reported here and elsewhere. In addition, Coleman's Bradford graphs do not render standardized comparisons.
W. Goffman, K. S. Warren,Scientific Information Systems and the Principle of Selectivity, Praeger, New York 1980.
With the theorem of equation (12) inBurrell (Ref. 4,, p. 189) it is possible to compute the Gini index from an empirical distribution of the Pareto form. However, the calculation uses the average number of articles per journal; Table 1 shows, however, that the same average can lead to quite different Pareto distributions.
J. Berg, R. Wagner-Döbler, A multidimensional analysis of scientific dynamics, Part 1, Case studies of mathematical logic in the 20th century,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 321–346.
L. Egghe, Application of the theory of Bradford's law to the calculation of Leimkuhler's law and to the completion of bibliographies,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (1990) 469–492.
L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, Reflections on a deflection: A note on different causes of the Groos droop,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 493–511.
H. Eto, Rising tail in Bradford distributions: its interpretation and application,Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 271–287.
Cf.Wagner-Döbler, Two components of a causal explanation of Bradford's law,Journal of Information Science, 22 (1996) 125–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner-Döbler, R. Time dependencies of Bradford distributions: Structures of journal output in 20th-century logic and 19th-century mathematics. Scientometrics 39, 231–252 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458528
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458528