Skip to main content
Log in

A multidimensional analysis of scientific dynamics. Part I. Case studies of mathematical logic in the 20th century

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sequences of empirical Lotka-like distributions of the publications of scientific areas are mapped into a multidimensional parameter space. On this basis a new definition of the notion of an epidemic phase of a discipline is introduced. A graphic representation of the parameter space along with results of an exponential regression analysis of the Lotka exponent yield an image of the inner state of a discipline and renders possible a prognosis. Examples, primarily from mathematical logic, are described in detail. The notion of a scientific elite is discussed and the hypotheses of Ortega, Merton, and Price are critically assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. A. Fairthorne, Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction,Journal of Documentation, 25 (1969), No. 4. Repr. in:T. Saracevic (Ed.),Introduction to Information Science, R. R. Bowker, New York, 1970, 521–534.

  2. J. R. Cole, S. Cole, The Ortega hypothesis,Science, 178 (1972) 368–375.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. K. Merton, Changing foci of interests in the sciences and technology. In:The Sociology of Science,R. K. Merton,N. W. Storer (Ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973, 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. J. de Solla Price,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Rescher,Scientific Progress. A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science, Blackwell, Oxford, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Cole,Making Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. H. Müller (Ed.), Ω-Bibliography of Mathematical Logic, Vols 1–6, Springer, Berlin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Wagner-Döbler, J. Berg,Mathematische Logik von 1847 bis zur Gegenwart, Eine bibliometrische Untersuchung, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Wagner-Döbler, J. Berg, Regularity and irregularity in the development of scientific disciplines: the case of mathematical logic,Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. J. Lotka, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity,Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16 (1926) 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Knopp,Theorie und Anwendung der unendlichen Reihen,4. Auflage, Springer, Berlin, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. L. Pao, Lotka's law: A testing procedure,Information Processing & Management, 21 (1985) 305–320.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. N. Petrov, G. M. Ulanov, S. V. Ul'yanov, E. M. Khazen,Informacionno-semantičeskie problemy v processakh upravleniya i organizacii, Isdat'elstvo “Nauka”, Moskva, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. L. Johnson, S. Kotz,Discrete Distributions, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. I. Yablonsky, On fundamental regularities of the distribution of scientific productivity,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. H. Fang, J. M. Fang, A modification of Lotka's function for scientific productivity,Information Management and Processing, 31 (1995) 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Price distribution, An exact formulation of Price's “Square Root Law”,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berg, J., Wagner-Döbler, R. A multidimensional analysis of scientific dynamics. Part I. Case studies of mathematical logic in the 20th century. Scientometrics 35, 321–346 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016904

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016904

Keywords

Navigation